Cargando…

Cardiac Activation Maps Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Between Data-Driven and Physics-Based Methods

One of the essential diagnostic tools of cardiac arrhythmia is activation mapping. Noninvasive current mapping procedures include electrocardiographic imaging. It allows reconstructing heart surface potentials from measured body surface potentials. Then, activation maps are generated using the heart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karoui, Amel, Bendahmane, Mostafa, Zemzemi, Nejib
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.686136
_version_ 1783750398032478208
author Karoui, Amel
Bendahmane, Mostafa
Zemzemi, Nejib
author_facet Karoui, Amel
Bendahmane, Mostafa
Zemzemi, Nejib
author_sort Karoui, Amel
collection PubMed
description One of the essential diagnostic tools of cardiac arrhythmia is activation mapping. Noninvasive current mapping procedures include electrocardiographic imaging. It allows reconstructing heart surface potentials from measured body surface potentials. Then, activation maps are generated using the heart surface potentials. Recently, a study suggests to deploy artificial neural networks to estimate activation maps directly from body surface potential measurements. Here we carry out a comparative study between the data-driven approach DirectMap and noninvasive classic technique based on reconstructed heart surface potentials using both Finite element method combined with L1-norm regularization (FEM-L1) and the spatial adaptation of Time-delay neural networks (SATDNN-AT). In this work, we assess the performance of the three approaches using a synthetic single paced-rhythm dataset generated on the atria surface. The results show that data-driven approach DirectMap quantitatively outperforms the two other methods. In fact, we observe an absolute activation time error and a correlation coefficient, respectively, equal to 7.20 ms, 93.2% using DirectMap, 14.60 ms, 76.2% using FEM-L1 and 13.58 ms, 79.6% using SATDNN-AT. In addition, results show that data-driven approaches (DirectMap and SATDNN-AT) are strongly robust against additive gaussian noise compared to FEM-L1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8428526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84285262021-09-10 Cardiac Activation Maps Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Between Data-Driven and Physics-Based Methods Karoui, Amel Bendahmane, Mostafa Zemzemi, Nejib Front Physiol Physiology One of the essential diagnostic tools of cardiac arrhythmia is activation mapping. Noninvasive current mapping procedures include electrocardiographic imaging. It allows reconstructing heart surface potentials from measured body surface potentials. Then, activation maps are generated using the heart surface potentials. Recently, a study suggests to deploy artificial neural networks to estimate activation maps directly from body surface potential measurements. Here we carry out a comparative study between the data-driven approach DirectMap and noninvasive classic technique based on reconstructed heart surface potentials using both Finite element method combined with L1-norm regularization (FEM-L1) and the spatial adaptation of Time-delay neural networks (SATDNN-AT). In this work, we assess the performance of the three approaches using a synthetic single paced-rhythm dataset generated on the atria surface. The results show that data-driven approach DirectMap quantitatively outperforms the two other methods. In fact, we observe an absolute activation time error and a correlation coefficient, respectively, equal to 7.20 ms, 93.2% using DirectMap, 14.60 ms, 76.2% using FEM-L1 and 13.58 ms, 79.6% using SATDNN-AT. In addition, results show that data-driven approaches (DirectMap and SATDNN-AT) are strongly robust against additive gaussian noise compared to FEM-L1. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8428526/ /pubmed/34512373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.686136 Text en Copyright © 2021 Karoui, Bendahmane and Zemzemi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Karoui, Amel
Bendahmane, Mostafa
Zemzemi, Nejib
Cardiac Activation Maps Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Between Data-Driven and Physics-Based Methods
title Cardiac Activation Maps Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Between Data-Driven and Physics-Based Methods
title_full Cardiac Activation Maps Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Between Data-Driven and Physics-Based Methods
title_fullStr Cardiac Activation Maps Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Between Data-Driven and Physics-Based Methods
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac Activation Maps Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Between Data-Driven and Physics-Based Methods
title_short Cardiac Activation Maps Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Between Data-Driven and Physics-Based Methods
title_sort cardiac activation maps reconstruction: a comparative study between data-driven and physics-based methods
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.686136
work_keys_str_mv AT karouiamel cardiacactivationmapsreconstructionacomparativestudybetweendatadrivenandphysicsbasedmethods
AT bendahmanemostafa cardiacactivationmapsreconstructionacomparativestudybetweendatadrivenandphysicsbasedmethods
AT zemzeminejib cardiacactivationmapsreconstructionacomparativestudybetweendatadrivenandphysicsbasedmethods