Cargando…

Identifying the potential of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration with life cycle models

An investigation into the causes of species decline should include examination of habitats important for multiple life stages. Integrating habitat impacts across life stages with life-cycle models (LCMs) can reveal habitat impairments inhibiting recovery and help guide restoration efforts. As part o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jorgensen, Jeffrey C., Nicol, Colin, Fogel, Caleb, Beechie, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34499669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256792
_version_ 1783750420017971200
author Jorgensen, Jeffrey C.
Nicol, Colin
Fogel, Caleb
Beechie, Timothy J.
author_facet Jorgensen, Jeffrey C.
Nicol, Colin
Fogel, Caleb
Beechie, Timothy J.
author_sort Jorgensen, Jeffrey C.
collection PubMed
description An investigation into the causes of species decline should include examination of habitats important for multiple life stages. Integrating habitat impacts across life stages with life-cycle models (LCMs) can reveal habitat impairments inhibiting recovery and help guide restoration efforts. As part of the final elements of the Habitat Restoration Planning model (HARP; Beechie et al. this volume), we developed LCMs for four populations of three species of anadromous salmonids (Oncorhynchus kisutch, O. tshawytscha, and O. mykiss), and ran diagnostic scenarios to examine effects of barrier removal, fine sediment reduction, wood augmentation, riparian shade, restoration of the main channel and bank conditions, beaver pond restoration, and floodplain reconnection. In the wood scenario, spawner abundance for all populations increased moderately (29–48%). In the shade scenario, spring-run Chinook salmon abundance increased the most (48%) and fall-run Chinook salmon and steelhead were much less responsive. Coho responded strongly to the beaver pond and floodplain scenarios (76% and 54%, respectively). The fine sediment scenario most benefitted fall- and spring-run Chinook salmon (32–63%), whereas steelhead and coho were less responsive (11–21% increase). More observations are needed to understand high fine sediment and its impacts. Our LCMs were region-specific, identifying places where habitat actions had the highest potential effects. For example, the increase in spring-run Chinook salmon in the wood scenario was driven by the Cascade Mountains Ecological Region. And, although the overall response of coho salmon was small in the barrier removal scenario (6% increase at the scale of the entire basin), barrier removals had important sub-regional impacts. The HARP analysis revealed basin-wide and regional population-specific potential benefits by action types, and this habitat-based approach could be used to develop restoration strategies and guide population rebuilding. An important next step will be to ground-truth our findings with robust empirically-based estimates of life stage-specific survivals and abundances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8428657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84286572021-09-10 Identifying the potential of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration with life cycle models Jorgensen, Jeffrey C. Nicol, Colin Fogel, Caleb Beechie, Timothy J. PLoS One Research Article An investigation into the causes of species decline should include examination of habitats important for multiple life stages. Integrating habitat impacts across life stages with life-cycle models (LCMs) can reveal habitat impairments inhibiting recovery and help guide restoration efforts. As part of the final elements of the Habitat Restoration Planning model (HARP; Beechie et al. this volume), we developed LCMs for four populations of three species of anadromous salmonids (Oncorhynchus kisutch, O. tshawytscha, and O. mykiss), and ran diagnostic scenarios to examine effects of barrier removal, fine sediment reduction, wood augmentation, riparian shade, restoration of the main channel and bank conditions, beaver pond restoration, and floodplain reconnection. In the wood scenario, spawner abundance for all populations increased moderately (29–48%). In the shade scenario, spring-run Chinook salmon abundance increased the most (48%) and fall-run Chinook salmon and steelhead were much less responsive. Coho responded strongly to the beaver pond and floodplain scenarios (76% and 54%, respectively). The fine sediment scenario most benefitted fall- and spring-run Chinook salmon (32–63%), whereas steelhead and coho were less responsive (11–21% increase). More observations are needed to understand high fine sediment and its impacts. Our LCMs were region-specific, identifying places where habitat actions had the highest potential effects. For example, the increase in spring-run Chinook salmon in the wood scenario was driven by the Cascade Mountains Ecological Region. And, although the overall response of coho salmon was small in the barrier removal scenario (6% increase at the scale of the entire basin), barrier removals had important sub-regional impacts. The HARP analysis revealed basin-wide and regional population-specific potential benefits by action types, and this habitat-based approach could be used to develop restoration strategies and guide population rebuilding. An important next step will be to ground-truth our findings with robust empirically-based estimates of life stage-specific survivals and abundances. Public Library of Science 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8428657/ /pubmed/34499669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256792 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jorgensen, Jeffrey C.
Nicol, Colin
Fogel, Caleb
Beechie, Timothy J.
Identifying the potential of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration with life cycle models
title Identifying the potential of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration with life cycle models
title_full Identifying the potential of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration with life cycle models
title_fullStr Identifying the potential of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration with life cycle models
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the potential of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration with life cycle models
title_short Identifying the potential of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration with life cycle models
title_sort identifying the potential of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration with life cycle models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34499669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256792
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgensenjeffreyc identifyingthepotentialofanadromoussalmonidhabitatrestorationwithlifecyclemodels
AT nicolcolin identifyingthepotentialofanadromoussalmonidhabitatrestorationwithlifecyclemodels
AT fogelcaleb identifyingthepotentialofanadromoussalmonidhabitatrestorationwithlifecyclemodels
AT beechietimothyj identifyingthepotentialofanadromoussalmonidhabitatrestorationwithlifecyclemodels