Cargando…

Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant immediately after birth is recommended regardless of delivery method; however, it is less common after cesarean delivery. We aimed to describe and compare women’s experiences of cesarean birth with and without skin-to-skin contact at an urba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Machold, Clea A., O’Rinn, Susan E., McKellin, William H., Ballantyne, Gillian, Barrett, Jon F.R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Joule Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34465580
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200079
_version_ 1783750461674749952
author Machold, Clea A.
O’Rinn, Susan E.
McKellin, William H.
Ballantyne, Gillian
Barrett, Jon F.R.
author_facet Machold, Clea A.
O’Rinn, Susan E.
McKellin, William H.
Ballantyne, Gillian
Barrett, Jon F.R.
author_sort Machold, Clea A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant immediately after birth is recommended regardless of delivery method; however, it is less common after cesarean delivery. We aimed to describe and compare women’s experiences of cesarean birth with and without skin-to-skin contact at an urban tertiary care hospital. METHODS: In this hermeneutic phenomenologic study, we used semistructured telephone interviews from 2015 to 2018 to interview a convenience sample of women who delivered at term by scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth at an urban tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Women were invited to participate if they had had a previous planned or unplanned cesarean birth and a scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth between 2013 and 2017. Participants were excluded if they had antenatally diagnosed conditions, they delivered before 37 weeks, they had general anesthesia, their condition was unstable at the time of surgery, a skin-to-skin cesarean birth was not possible or they declined skin-to-skin cesarean birth. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed by means of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ten women were interviewed 1–19 months postpartum. Four central themes emerged: support for skin-to-skin cesarean birth (women feeling supported by their families and health care providers); control (participants experiencing greater control during their skin-to-skin cesarean birth); connection with the infant, which enabled women to be active participants in their delivery, enhanced bonding and intimacy, facilitated breastfeeding and bolstered confidence during early parenthood; and logistic considerations, with participants recognizing that skin-to-skin cesarean birth required additional resources. INTERPRETATION: These findings refine what is known about skin-to-skin cesarean birth and provide a critical perspective, that of mothers. They support the transformation of traditional operating room dynamics to a more patient-centred environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8428890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher CMA Joule Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84288902021-09-10 Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study Machold, Clea A. O’Rinn, Susan E. McKellin, William H. Ballantyne, Gillian Barrett, Jon F.R. CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: Skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant immediately after birth is recommended regardless of delivery method; however, it is less common after cesarean delivery. We aimed to describe and compare women’s experiences of cesarean birth with and without skin-to-skin contact at an urban tertiary care hospital. METHODS: In this hermeneutic phenomenologic study, we used semistructured telephone interviews from 2015 to 2018 to interview a convenience sample of women who delivered at term by scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth at an urban tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Women were invited to participate if they had had a previous planned or unplanned cesarean birth and a scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth between 2013 and 2017. Participants were excluded if they had antenatally diagnosed conditions, they delivered before 37 weeks, they had general anesthesia, their condition was unstable at the time of surgery, a skin-to-skin cesarean birth was not possible or they declined skin-to-skin cesarean birth. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed by means of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ten women were interviewed 1–19 months postpartum. Four central themes emerged: support for skin-to-skin cesarean birth (women feeling supported by their families and health care providers); control (participants experiencing greater control during their skin-to-skin cesarean birth); connection with the infant, which enabled women to be active participants in their delivery, enhanced bonding and intimacy, facilitated breastfeeding and bolstered confidence during early parenthood; and logistic considerations, with participants recognizing that skin-to-skin cesarean birth required additional resources. INTERPRETATION: These findings refine what is known about skin-to-skin cesarean birth and provide a critical perspective, that of mothers. They support the transformation of traditional operating room dynamics to a more patient-centred environment. CMA Joule Inc. 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8428890/ /pubmed/34465580 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200079 Text en © 2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Machold, Clea A.
O’Rinn, Susan E.
McKellin, William H.
Ballantyne, Gillian
Barrett, Jon F.R.
Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study
title Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study
title_full Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study
title_short Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study
title_sort women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34465580
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200079
work_keys_str_mv AT macholdcleaa womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy
AT orinnsusane womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy
AT mckellinwilliamh womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy
AT ballantynegillian womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy
AT barrettjonfr womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy