Cargando…
Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant immediately after birth is recommended regardless of delivery method; however, it is less common after cesarean delivery. We aimed to describe and compare women’s experiences of cesarean birth with and without skin-to-skin contact at an urba...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Joule Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34465580 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200079 |
_version_ | 1783750461674749952 |
---|---|
author | Machold, Clea A. O’Rinn, Susan E. McKellin, William H. Ballantyne, Gillian Barrett, Jon F.R. |
author_facet | Machold, Clea A. O’Rinn, Susan E. McKellin, William H. Ballantyne, Gillian Barrett, Jon F.R. |
author_sort | Machold, Clea A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant immediately after birth is recommended regardless of delivery method; however, it is less common after cesarean delivery. We aimed to describe and compare women’s experiences of cesarean birth with and without skin-to-skin contact at an urban tertiary care hospital. METHODS: In this hermeneutic phenomenologic study, we used semistructured telephone interviews from 2015 to 2018 to interview a convenience sample of women who delivered at term by scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth at an urban tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Women were invited to participate if they had had a previous planned or unplanned cesarean birth and a scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth between 2013 and 2017. Participants were excluded if they had antenatally diagnosed conditions, they delivered before 37 weeks, they had general anesthesia, their condition was unstable at the time of surgery, a skin-to-skin cesarean birth was not possible or they declined skin-to-skin cesarean birth. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed by means of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ten women were interviewed 1–19 months postpartum. Four central themes emerged: support for skin-to-skin cesarean birth (women feeling supported by their families and health care providers); control (participants experiencing greater control during their skin-to-skin cesarean birth); connection with the infant, which enabled women to be active participants in their delivery, enhanced bonding and intimacy, facilitated breastfeeding and bolstered confidence during early parenthood; and logistic considerations, with participants recognizing that skin-to-skin cesarean birth required additional resources. INTERPRETATION: These findings refine what is known about skin-to-skin cesarean birth and provide a critical perspective, that of mothers. They support the transformation of traditional operating room dynamics to a more patient-centred environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8428890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | CMA Joule Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84288902021-09-10 Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study Machold, Clea A. O’Rinn, Susan E. McKellin, William H. Ballantyne, Gillian Barrett, Jon F.R. CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: Skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant immediately after birth is recommended regardless of delivery method; however, it is less common after cesarean delivery. We aimed to describe and compare women’s experiences of cesarean birth with and without skin-to-skin contact at an urban tertiary care hospital. METHODS: In this hermeneutic phenomenologic study, we used semistructured telephone interviews from 2015 to 2018 to interview a convenience sample of women who delivered at term by scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth at an urban tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Women were invited to participate if they had had a previous planned or unplanned cesarean birth and a scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth between 2013 and 2017. Participants were excluded if they had antenatally diagnosed conditions, they delivered before 37 weeks, they had general anesthesia, their condition was unstable at the time of surgery, a skin-to-skin cesarean birth was not possible or they declined skin-to-skin cesarean birth. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed by means of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ten women were interviewed 1–19 months postpartum. Four central themes emerged: support for skin-to-skin cesarean birth (women feeling supported by their families and health care providers); control (participants experiencing greater control during their skin-to-skin cesarean birth); connection with the infant, which enabled women to be active participants in their delivery, enhanced bonding and intimacy, facilitated breastfeeding and bolstered confidence during early parenthood; and logistic considerations, with participants recognizing that skin-to-skin cesarean birth required additional resources. INTERPRETATION: These findings refine what is known about skin-to-skin cesarean birth and provide a critical perspective, that of mothers. They support the transformation of traditional operating room dynamics to a more patient-centred environment. CMA Joule Inc. 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8428890/ /pubmed/34465580 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200079 Text en © 2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Machold, Clea A. O’Rinn, Susan E. McKellin, William H. Ballantyne, Gillian Barrett, Jon F.R. Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study |
title | Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study |
title_full | Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study |
title_short | Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study |
title_sort | women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34465580 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macholdcleaa womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy AT orinnsusane womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy AT mckellinwilliamh womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy AT ballantynegillian womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy AT barrettjonfr womensexperiencesofskintoskincesareanbirthcomparedtostandardcesareanbirthaqualitativestudy |