Cargando…

The low acute effectiveness of a high-power short duration radiofrequency current application technique in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Application of high power radiofrequency (RF) energy for a short duration (HPSD) to isolate pulmonary vein (PV) is an emerging technique. But power and duration settings are very different across different centers. Moreover, despite encouraging preclinical and clinical data, studies meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ücer, Ekrem, Jungbauer, Carsten, Hauck, Christian, Kaufmann, Manuel, Poschenreider, Florian, Maier, Lars, Fredersdorf, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32207843
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0033
_version_ 1783750470096912384
author Ücer, Ekrem
Jungbauer, Carsten
Hauck, Christian
Kaufmann, Manuel
Poschenreider, Florian
Maier, Lars
Fredersdorf, Sabine
author_facet Ücer, Ekrem
Jungbauer, Carsten
Hauck, Christian
Kaufmann, Manuel
Poschenreider, Florian
Maier, Lars
Fredersdorf, Sabine
author_sort Ücer, Ekrem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Application of high power radiofrequency (RF) energy for a short duration (HPSD) to isolate pulmonary vein (PV) is an emerging technique. But power and duration settings are very different across different centers. Moreover, despite encouraging preclinical and clinical data, studies measuring acute effectiveness of various HPSD settings are limited. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) were treated with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using HPSD. PVI was performed with a contact force catheter (Thermocool SF Smart-Touch) and Carto 3 System. The following parameters were used: energy output 50 W, target temperature 43°C, irrigation 15 mL/min, targeted contact force of > 10 g. RF energy was applied for 6–10 s. Required minimal interlesion distance was 4 mm. Twenty minutes after each successful PVI adenosine provocation test (APT) was performed by administrating 18 mg adenosine to unmask dormant PV conduction. RESULTS: All PVs (100 PVs) were successfully isolated. RF lesions needed per patient were 131 ± 41, the average duration for each RF application was 8.1 ± 1.7 s. Procedure time was 138 ± 21 min and average of total RF energy duration was 16.3 ± 5.2 min and average amount of RF energy was 48209 ± 12808 W. APT application time after PVI was 31.1 ± 8.3 min for the left sided PVs and 22.2 ± 4.6 min (p = 0.005) for the right sided PVs. APT was transiently positive in 18 PVs (18%) in 8 (32%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary vein isolation with high power for 6–10 s is feasible and shortens the procedure and ablation duration. However, acute effectiveness of the HPSD seems to be lower than expected. Further studies combining other ablation parameters are needed to improve this promising technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8428945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84289452021-09-10 The low acute effectiveness of a high-power short duration radiofrequency current application technique in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation Ücer, Ekrem Jungbauer, Carsten Hauck, Christian Kaufmann, Manuel Poschenreider, Florian Maier, Lars Fredersdorf, Sabine Cardiol J Interventional Cardiology BACKGROUND: Application of high power radiofrequency (RF) energy for a short duration (HPSD) to isolate pulmonary vein (PV) is an emerging technique. But power and duration settings are very different across different centers. Moreover, despite encouraging preclinical and clinical data, studies measuring acute effectiveness of various HPSD settings are limited. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) were treated with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using HPSD. PVI was performed with a contact force catheter (Thermocool SF Smart-Touch) and Carto 3 System. The following parameters were used: energy output 50 W, target temperature 43°C, irrigation 15 mL/min, targeted contact force of > 10 g. RF energy was applied for 6–10 s. Required minimal interlesion distance was 4 mm. Twenty minutes after each successful PVI adenosine provocation test (APT) was performed by administrating 18 mg adenosine to unmask dormant PV conduction. RESULTS: All PVs (100 PVs) were successfully isolated. RF lesions needed per patient were 131 ± 41, the average duration for each RF application was 8.1 ± 1.7 s. Procedure time was 138 ± 21 min and average of total RF energy duration was 16.3 ± 5.2 min and average amount of RF energy was 48209 ± 12808 W. APT application time after PVI was 31.1 ± 8.3 min for the left sided PVs and 22.2 ± 4.6 min (p = 0.005) for the right sided PVs. APT was transiently positive in 18 PVs (18%) in 8 (32%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary vein isolation with high power for 6–10 s is feasible and shortens the procedure and ablation duration. However, acute effectiveness of the HPSD seems to be lower than expected. Further studies combining other ablation parameters are needed to improve this promising technique. Via Medica 2020-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8428945/ /pubmed/32207843 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0033 Text en Copyright © 2021 Via Medica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.
spellingShingle Interventional Cardiology
Ücer, Ekrem
Jungbauer, Carsten
Hauck, Christian
Kaufmann, Manuel
Poschenreider, Florian
Maier, Lars
Fredersdorf, Sabine
The low acute effectiveness of a high-power short duration radiofrequency current application technique in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
title The low acute effectiveness of a high-power short duration radiofrequency current application technique in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_full The low acute effectiveness of a high-power short duration radiofrequency current application technique in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr The low acute effectiveness of a high-power short duration radiofrequency current application technique in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed The low acute effectiveness of a high-power short duration radiofrequency current application technique in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_short The low acute effectiveness of a high-power short duration radiofrequency current application technique in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_sort low acute effectiveness of a high-power short duration radiofrequency current application technique in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
topic Interventional Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32207843
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0033
work_keys_str_mv AT ucerekrem thelowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT jungbauercarsten thelowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT hauckchristian thelowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT kaufmannmanuel thelowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT poschenreiderflorian thelowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT maierlars thelowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT fredersdorfsabine thelowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT ucerekrem lowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT jungbauercarsten lowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT hauckchristian lowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT kaufmannmanuel lowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT poschenreiderflorian lowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT maierlars lowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT fredersdorfsabine lowacuteeffectivenessofahighpowershortdurationradiofrequencycurrentapplicationtechniqueinpulmonaryveinisolationforatrialfibrillation