Cargando…
Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services
PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that the distinctive relational qualities of peer support—compared to clinical-patient relationships—can be eroded in regulated healthcare environments. Measurement of fidelity in trials of peer support is lacking. This paper reports the development and testing of a fideli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4 |
_version_ | 1783750499458088960 |
---|---|
author | Gillard, S. Banach, N. Barlow, E. Byrne, J. Foster, R. Goldsmith, L. Marks, J. McWilliam, C. Morshead, R. Stepanian, K. Turner, R. Verey, A. White, S. |
author_facet | Gillard, S. Banach, N. Barlow, E. Byrne, J. Foster, R. Goldsmith, L. Marks, J. McWilliam, C. Morshead, R. Stepanian, K. Turner, R. Verey, A. White, S. |
author_sort | Gillard, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that the distinctive relational qualities of peer support—compared to clinical-patient relationships—can be eroded in regulated healthcare environments. Measurement of fidelity in trials of peer support is lacking. This paper reports the development and testing of a fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services, designed to assess fidelity to principles that characterise the distinctiveness of peer support. METHODS: A draft index was developed using expert panels of service user researchers and people doing peer support, informed by an evidence-based, peer support principles framework. Two rounds of testing took place in 24 mental health services providing peer support in a range of settings. Fidelity was assessed through interviews with peer workers, their supervisors and people receiving peer support. Responses were tested for spread and internal consistency, independently double rated for inter-rater reliability, with feedback from interviewees and service user researchers used to refine the index. RESULTS: A fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services was produced with good psychometric properties. Fidelity is assessed in four principle-based domains; building trusting relationships based on shared lived experience; reciprocity and mutuality; leadership, choice and control; building strengths and making connections to community. CONCLUSIONS: The index offers potential to improve the evidence base for peer support in mental health services, enabling future trials to assess fidelity of interventions to peer support principles, and service providers a means of ensuring that peer support retains its distinctive qualities as it is introduced into mental health services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8429155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84291552021-09-29 Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services Gillard, S. Banach, N. Barlow, E. Byrne, J. Foster, R. Goldsmith, L. Marks, J. McWilliam, C. Morshead, R. Stepanian, K. Turner, R. Verey, A. White, S. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Original Paper PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that the distinctive relational qualities of peer support—compared to clinical-patient relationships—can be eroded in regulated healthcare environments. Measurement of fidelity in trials of peer support is lacking. This paper reports the development and testing of a fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services, designed to assess fidelity to principles that characterise the distinctiveness of peer support. METHODS: A draft index was developed using expert panels of service user researchers and people doing peer support, informed by an evidence-based, peer support principles framework. Two rounds of testing took place in 24 mental health services providing peer support in a range of settings. Fidelity was assessed through interviews with peer workers, their supervisors and people receiving peer support. Responses were tested for spread and internal consistency, independently double rated for inter-rater reliability, with feedback from interviewees and service user researchers used to refine the index. RESULTS: A fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services was produced with good psychometric properties. Fidelity is assessed in four principle-based domains; building trusting relationships based on shared lived experience; reciprocity and mutuality; leadership, choice and control; building strengths and making connections to community. CONCLUSIONS: The index offers potential to improve the evidence base for peer support in mental health services, enabling future trials to assess fidelity of interventions to peer support principles, and service providers a means of ensuring that peer support retains its distinctive qualities as it is introduced into mental health services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8429155/ /pubmed/33606048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gillard, S. Banach, N. Barlow, E. Byrne, J. Foster, R. Goldsmith, L. Marks, J. McWilliam, C. Morshead, R. Stepanian, K. Turner, R. Verey, A. White, S. Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services |
title | Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services |
title_full | Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services |
title_fullStr | Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services |
title_short | Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services |
title_sort | developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillards developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT banachn developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT barlowe developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT byrnej developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT fosterr developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT goldsmithl developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT marksj developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT mcwilliamc developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT morsheadr developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT stepaniank developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT turnerr developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT vereya developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices AT whites developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices |