Cargando…

Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services

PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that the distinctive relational qualities of peer support—compared to clinical-patient relationships—can be eroded in regulated healthcare environments. Measurement of fidelity in trials of peer support is lacking. This paper reports the development and testing of a fideli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillard, S., Banach, N., Barlow, E., Byrne, J., Foster, R., Goldsmith, L., Marks, J., McWilliam, C., Morshead, R., Stepanian, K., Turner, R., Verey, A., White, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4
_version_ 1783750499458088960
author Gillard, S.
Banach, N.
Barlow, E.
Byrne, J.
Foster, R.
Goldsmith, L.
Marks, J.
McWilliam, C.
Morshead, R.
Stepanian, K.
Turner, R.
Verey, A.
White, S.
author_facet Gillard, S.
Banach, N.
Barlow, E.
Byrne, J.
Foster, R.
Goldsmith, L.
Marks, J.
McWilliam, C.
Morshead, R.
Stepanian, K.
Turner, R.
Verey, A.
White, S.
author_sort Gillard, S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that the distinctive relational qualities of peer support—compared to clinical-patient relationships—can be eroded in regulated healthcare environments. Measurement of fidelity in trials of peer support is lacking. This paper reports the development and testing of a fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services, designed to assess fidelity to principles that characterise the distinctiveness of peer support. METHODS: A draft index was developed using expert panels of service user researchers and people doing peer support, informed by an evidence-based, peer support principles framework. Two rounds of testing took place in 24 mental health services providing peer support in a range of settings. Fidelity was assessed through interviews with peer workers, their supervisors and people receiving peer support. Responses were tested for spread and internal consistency, independently double rated for inter-rater reliability, with feedback from interviewees and service user researchers used to refine the index. RESULTS: A fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services was produced with good psychometric properties. Fidelity is assessed in four principle-based domains; building trusting relationships based on shared lived experience; reciprocity and mutuality; leadership, choice and control; building strengths and making connections to community. CONCLUSIONS: The index offers potential to improve the evidence base for peer support in mental health services, enabling future trials to assess fidelity of interventions to peer support principles, and service providers a means of ensuring that peer support retains its distinctive qualities as it is introduced into mental health services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8429155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84291552021-09-29 Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services Gillard, S. Banach, N. Barlow, E. Byrne, J. Foster, R. Goldsmith, L. Marks, J. McWilliam, C. Morshead, R. Stepanian, K. Turner, R. Verey, A. White, S. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Original Paper PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that the distinctive relational qualities of peer support—compared to clinical-patient relationships—can be eroded in regulated healthcare environments. Measurement of fidelity in trials of peer support is lacking. This paper reports the development and testing of a fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services, designed to assess fidelity to principles that characterise the distinctiveness of peer support. METHODS: A draft index was developed using expert panels of service user researchers and people doing peer support, informed by an evidence-based, peer support principles framework. Two rounds of testing took place in 24 mental health services providing peer support in a range of settings. Fidelity was assessed through interviews with peer workers, their supervisors and people receiving peer support. Responses were tested for spread and internal consistency, independently double rated for inter-rater reliability, with feedback from interviewees and service user researchers used to refine the index. RESULTS: A fidelity index for one-to-one peer support in mental health services was produced with good psychometric properties. Fidelity is assessed in four principle-based domains; building trusting relationships based on shared lived experience; reciprocity and mutuality; leadership, choice and control; building strengths and making connections to community. CONCLUSIONS: The index offers potential to improve the evidence base for peer support in mental health services, enabling future trials to assess fidelity of interventions to peer support principles, and service providers a means of ensuring that peer support retains its distinctive qualities as it is introduced into mental health services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8429155/ /pubmed/33606048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gillard, S.
Banach, N.
Barlow, E.
Byrne, J.
Foster, R.
Goldsmith, L.
Marks, J.
McWilliam, C.
Morshead, R.
Stepanian, K.
Turner, R.
Verey, A.
White, S.
Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services
title Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services
title_full Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services
title_fullStr Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services
title_full_unstemmed Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services
title_short Developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services
title_sort developing and testing a principle-based fidelity index for peer support in mental health services
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02038-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gillards developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT banachn developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT barlowe developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT byrnej developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT fosterr developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT goldsmithl developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT marksj developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT mcwilliamc developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT morsheadr developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT stepaniank developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT turnerr developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT vereya developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices
AT whites developingandtestingaprinciplebasedfidelityindexforpeersupportinmentalhealthservices