Cargando…
Is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities?
PURPOSE: There is consensus that Quality of Life (QOL) should be obtained through self-reports from people with intellectual Disability (ID). Thus far, there have been no attempts to collect self-reported QOL from people who are deaf and have ID. METHODS: Based on an established short measure for QO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01957-y |
_version_ | 1783750521541099520 |
---|---|
author | Fellinger, Johannes Dall, Magdalena Gerich, Joachim Fellinger, Maria Schossleitner, Katharina Barbaresi, William Joseph Holzinger, Daniel |
author_facet | Fellinger, Johannes Dall, Magdalena Gerich, Joachim Fellinger, Maria Schossleitner, Katharina Barbaresi, William Joseph Holzinger, Daniel |
author_sort | Fellinger, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There is consensus that Quality of Life (QOL) should be obtained through self-reports from people with intellectual Disability (ID). Thus far, there have been no attempts to collect self-reported QOL from people who are deaf and have ID. METHODS: Based on an established short measure for QOL (EUROHIS-QOL), an adapted easy-to-understand sign language interview was developed and applied in a population (n = 61) with severe-to-profound hearing loss and mild-to-profound ID. Self-reports were conducted at two time points (t(1) and t(2)), 6 months apart. The Stark QOL, an established picture-based questionnaire, was also obtained at t(2) and three Proxy ratings of QOL (from caregivers) were conducted for each participant at t(1). RESULTS: Self-reported QOL was successfully administered at both time points for 44 individuals with mild and moderate ID (IQ reference age between 3.3 and 11.8 years). The self-reports showed sufficient test–retest reliability and significant correlations with the Stark QOL. As anticipated, self-reported QOL was higher than proxy-reported QOL. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were good for self-reported QOL. CONCLUSION: Reliable and valid self-reports of QOL can be obtained from deaf adults with mild-moderate ID using standard inventories adapted to the linguistic and cognitive level of these individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8429394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84293942021-09-24 Is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities? Fellinger, Johannes Dall, Magdalena Gerich, Joachim Fellinger, Maria Schossleitner, Katharina Barbaresi, William Joseph Holzinger, Daniel Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Original Paper PURPOSE: There is consensus that Quality of Life (QOL) should be obtained through self-reports from people with intellectual Disability (ID). Thus far, there have been no attempts to collect self-reported QOL from people who are deaf and have ID. METHODS: Based on an established short measure for QOL (EUROHIS-QOL), an adapted easy-to-understand sign language interview was developed and applied in a population (n = 61) with severe-to-profound hearing loss and mild-to-profound ID. Self-reports were conducted at two time points (t(1) and t(2)), 6 months apart. The Stark QOL, an established picture-based questionnaire, was also obtained at t(2) and three Proxy ratings of QOL (from caregivers) were conducted for each participant at t(1). RESULTS: Self-reported QOL was successfully administered at both time points for 44 individuals with mild and moderate ID (IQ reference age between 3.3 and 11.8 years). The self-reports showed sufficient test–retest reliability and significant correlations with the Stark QOL. As anticipated, self-reported QOL was higher than proxy-reported QOL. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were good for self-reported QOL. CONCLUSION: Reliable and valid self-reports of QOL can be obtained from deaf adults with mild-moderate ID using standard inventories adapted to the linguistic and cognitive level of these individuals. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8429394/ /pubmed/32926181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01957-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Fellinger, Johannes Dall, Magdalena Gerich, Joachim Fellinger, Maria Schossleitner, Katharina Barbaresi, William Joseph Holzinger, Daniel Is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities? |
title | Is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities? |
title_full | Is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities? |
title_fullStr | Is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities? |
title_short | Is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities? |
title_sort | is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities? |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01957-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fellingerjohannes isitfeasibletoassessselfreportedqualityoflifeinindividualswhoaredeafandhaveintellectualdisabilities AT dallmagdalena isitfeasibletoassessselfreportedqualityoflifeinindividualswhoaredeafandhaveintellectualdisabilities AT gerichjoachim isitfeasibletoassessselfreportedqualityoflifeinindividualswhoaredeafandhaveintellectualdisabilities AT fellingermaria isitfeasibletoassessselfreportedqualityoflifeinindividualswhoaredeafandhaveintellectualdisabilities AT schossleitnerkatharina isitfeasibletoassessselfreportedqualityoflifeinindividualswhoaredeafandhaveintellectualdisabilities AT barbaresiwilliamjoseph isitfeasibletoassessselfreportedqualityoflifeinindividualswhoaredeafandhaveintellectualdisabilities AT holzingerdaniel isitfeasibletoassessselfreportedqualityoflifeinindividualswhoaredeafandhaveintellectualdisabilities |