Cargando…

Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection

The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess the impact of rifaximin on the course of liver function, liver regeneration and volumetric recovery in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. The ARROW trial was an investigator initiated, single-center, open-label, phase 3 RCT wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bednarsch, Jan, Czigany, Zoltan, Loosen, Sven H., Heij, Lara, Ruckgaber, Lorenz, Maes, Henning, Krause, Jan-Pit, Reen, Matthias, Toteva, Beata, Vosdellen, Theresa, Bruners, Philipp, Lang, Sven Arke, Ulmer, Tom Florian, Roderburg, Christoph, Luedde, Tom, Neumann, Ulf Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97442-w
_version_ 1783750550518497280
author Bednarsch, Jan
Czigany, Zoltan
Loosen, Sven H.
Heij, Lara
Ruckgaber, Lorenz
Maes, Henning
Krause, Jan-Pit
Reen, Matthias
Toteva, Beata
Vosdellen, Theresa
Bruners, Philipp
Lang, Sven Arke
Ulmer, Tom Florian
Roderburg, Christoph
Luedde, Tom
Neumann, Ulf Peter
author_facet Bednarsch, Jan
Czigany, Zoltan
Loosen, Sven H.
Heij, Lara
Ruckgaber, Lorenz
Maes, Henning
Krause, Jan-Pit
Reen, Matthias
Toteva, Beata
Vosdellen, Theresa
Bruners, Philipp
Lang, Sven Arke
Ulmer, Tom Florian
Roderburg, Christoph
Luedde, Tom
Neumann, Ulf Peter
author_sort Bednarsch, Jan
collection PubMed
description The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess the impact of rifaximin on the course of liver function, liver regeneration and volumetric recovery in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. The ARROW trial was an investigator initiated, single-center, open-label, phase 3 RCT with two parallel treatment groups, conducted at our hepatobiliary center from 03/2016 to 07/2020. Patients undergoing major hepatectomy were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral rifaximin (550 mg twice daily for 7–10 or 14–21 days in case of portal vein embolization preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively) versus no intervention. Primary endpoint was the relative increase in postoperative liver function measured by LiMAx from postoperative day (POD) 4 to 7. Secondary endpoint were the course of liver function and liver volume during the study period as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality. Between 2016 and 2020, 45 patients were randomized and 35 patients (16 individuals in the rifaximin and 19 individuals in the control group) were eligible for per-protocol analysis. The study was prematurely terminated following interim analysis, due to the unlikelihood of reaching a significant primary endpoint. The median relative increase in liver function from POD 4 to POD 7 was 27% in the rifaximin group and 41% in the control group (p = 0.399). Further, no significant difference was found in terms of any other endpoints of functional liver- and volume regeneration or perioperative surgical complications following the application of rifaximin versus no intervention. Perioperative application of rifaximin has no effect on functional or volumetric regeneration after major hepatectomy (NCT02555293; EudraCT 2013-004644-28).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8429542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84295422021-09-10 Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection Bednarsch, Jan Czigany, Zoltan Loosen, Sven H. Heij, Lara Ruckgaber, Lorenz Maes, Henning Krause, Jan-Pit Reen, Matthias Toteva, Beata Vosdellen, Theresa Bruners, Philipp Lang, Sven Arke Ulmer, Tom Florian Roderburg, Christoph Luedde, Tom Neumann, Ulf Peter Sci Rep Article The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess the impact of rifaximin on the course of liver function, liver regeneration and volumetric recovery in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. The ARROW trial was an investigator initiated, single-center, open-label, phase 3 RCT with two parallel treatment groups, conducted at our hepatobiliary center from 03/2016 to 07/2020. Patients undergoing major hepatectomy were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral rifaximin (550 mg twice daily for 7–10 or 14–21 days in case of portal vein embolization preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively) versus no intervention. Primary endpoint was the relative increase in postoperative liver function measured by LiMAx from postoperative day (POD) 4 to 7. Secondary endpoint were the course of liver function and liver volume during the study period as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality. Between 2016 and 2020, 45 patients were randomized and 35 patients (16 individuals in the rifaximin and 19 individuals in the control group) were eligible for per-protocol analysis. The study was prematurely terminated following interim analysis, due to the unlikelihood of reaching a significant primary endpoint. The median relative increase in liver function from POD 4 to POD 7 was 27% in the rifaximin group and 41% in the control group (p = 0.399). Further, no significant difference was found in terms of any other endpoints of functional liver- and volume regeneration or perioperative surgical complications following the application of rifaximin versus no intervention. Perioperative application of rifaximin has no effect on functional or volumetric regeneration after major hepatectomy (NCT02555293; EudraCT 2013-004644-28). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8429542/ /pubmed/34504196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97442-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Bednarsch, Jan
Czigany, Zoltan
Loosen, Sven H.
Heij, Lara
Ruckgaber, Lorenz
Maes, Henning
Krause, Jan-Pit
Reen, Matthias
Toteva, Beata
Vosdellen, Theresa
Bruners, Philipp
Lang, Sven Arke
Ulmer, Tom Florian
Roderburg, Christoph
Luedde, Tom
Neumann, Ulf Peter
Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection
title Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection
title_full Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection
title_fullStr Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection
title_short Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection
title_sort perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97442-w
work_keys_str_mv AT bednarschjan perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT cziganyzoltan perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT loosensvenh perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT heijlara perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT ruckgaberlorenz perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT maeshenning perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT krausejanpit perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT reenmatthias perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT totevabeata perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT vosdellentheresa perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT brunersphilipp perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT langsvenarke perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT ulmertomflorian perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT roderburgchristoph perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT lueddetom perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection
AT neumannulfpeter perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection