Cargando…
Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection
The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess the impact of rifaximin on the course of liver function, liver regeneration and volumetric recovery in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. The ARROW trial was an investigator initiated, single-center, open-label, phase 3 RCT wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97442-w |
_version_ | 1783750550518497280 |
---|---|
author | Bednarsch, Jan Czigany, Zoltan Loosen, Sven H. Heij, Lara Ruckgaber, Lorenz Maes, Henning Krause, Jan-Pit Reen, Matthias Toteva, Beata Vosdellen, Theresa Bruners, Philipp Lang, Sven Arke Ulmer, Tom Florian Roderburg, Christoph Luedde, Tom Neumann, Ulf Peter |
author_facet | Bednarsch, Jan Czigany, Zoltan Loosen, Sven H. Heij, Lara Ruckgaber, Lorenz Maes, Henning Krause, Jan-Pit Reen, Matthias Toteva, Beata Vosdellen, Theresa Bruners, Philipp Lang, Sven Arke Ulmer, Tom Florian Roderburg, Christoph Luedde, Tom Neumann, Ulf Peter |
author_sort | Bednarsch, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess the impact of rifaximin on the course of liver function, liver regeneration and volumetric recovery in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. The ARROW trial was an investigator initiated, single-center, open-label, phase 3 RCT with two parallel treatment groups, conducted at our hepatobiliary center from 03/2016 to 07/2020. Patients undergoing major hepatectomy were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral rifaximin (550 mg twice daily for 7–10 or 14–21 days in case of portal vein embolization preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively) versus no intervention. Primary endpoint was the relative increase in postoperative liver function measured by LiMAx from postoperative day (POD) 4 to 7. Secondary endpoint were the course of liver function and liver volume during the study period as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality. Between 2016 and 2020, 45 patients were randomized and 35 patients (16 individuals in the rifaximin and 19 individuals in the control group) were eligible for per-protocol analysis. The study was prematurely terminated following interim analysis, due to the unlikelihood of reaching a significant primary endpoint. The median relative increase in liver function from POD 4 to POD 7 was 27% in the rifaximin group and 41% in the control group (p = 0.399). Further, no significant difference was found in terms of any other endpoints of functional liver- and volume regeneration or perioperative surgical complications following the application of rifaximin versus no intervention. Perioperative application of rifaximin has no effect on functional or volumetric regeneration after major hepatectomy (NCT02555293; EudraCT 2013-004644-28). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8429542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84295422021-09-10 Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection Bednarsch, Jan Czigany, Zoltan Loosen, Sven H. Heij, Lara Ruckgaber, Lorenz Maes, Henning Krause, Jan-Pit Reen, Matthias Toteva, Beata Vosdellen, Theresa Bruners, Philipp Lang, Sven Arke Ulmer, Tom Florian Roderburg, Christoph Luedde, Tom Neumann, Ulf Peter Sci Rep Article The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess the impact of rifaximin on the course of liver function, liver regeneration and volumetric recovery in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. The ARROW trial was an investigator initiated, single-center, open-label, phase 3 RCT with two parallel treatment groups, conducted at our hepatobiliary center from 03/2016 to 07/2020. Patients undergoing major hepatectomy were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral rifaximin (550 mg twice daily for 7–10 or 14–21 days in case of portal vein embolization preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively) versus no intervention. Primary endpoint was the relative increase in postoperative liver function measured by LiMAx from postoperative day (POD) 4 to 7. Secondary endpoint were the course of liver function and liver volume during the study period as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality. Between 2016 and 2020, 45 patients were randomized and 35 patients (16 individuals in the rifaximin and 19 individuals in the control group) were eligible for per-protocol analysis. The study was prematurely terminated following interim analysis, due to the unlikelihood of reaching a significant primary endpoint. The median relative increase in liver function from POD 4 to POD 7 was 27% in the rifaximin group and 41% in the control group (p = 0.399). Further, no significant difference was found in terms of any other endpoints of functional liver- and volume regeneration or perioperative surgical complications following the application of rifaximin versus no intervention. Perioperative application of rifaximin has no effect on functional or volumetric regeneration after major hepatectomy (NCT02555293; EudraCT 2013-004644-28). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8429542/ /pubmed/34504196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97442-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Bednarsch, Jan Czigany, Zoltan Loosen, Sven H. Heij, Lara Ruckgaber, Lorenz Maes, Henning Krause, Jan-Pit Reen, Matthias Toteva, Beata Vosdellen, Theresa Bruners, Philipp Lang, Sven Arke Ulmer, Tom Florian Roderburg, Christoph Luedde, Tom Neumann, Ulf Peter Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection |
title | Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection |
title_full | Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection |
title_fullStr | Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection |
title_full_unstemmed | Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection |
title_short | Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection |
title_sort | perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97442-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bednarschjan perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT cziganyzoltan perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT loosensvenh perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT heijlara perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT ruckgaberlorenz perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT maeshenning perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT krausejanpit perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT reenmatthias perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT totevabeata perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT vosdellentheresa perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT brunersphilipp perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT langsvenarke perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT ulmertomflorian perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT roderburgchristoph perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT lueddetom perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection AT neumannulfpeter perioperativerifaximinisnotassociatedwithenhancedfunctionalandvolumetricrecoveryaftermajorliverresection |