Cargando…

Psychophysiological stress-reactivity in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers

BACKGROUND: Psychosis is associated with dysregulation of psychophysiological stress-reactivity, including in subjective, autonomic nervous system (ANS) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) parameters. AIMS: This study investigated whether dysregulated psychophysiological stress-reactivity is sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumeister, David, Pillinger, Toby, Howes, Oliver, Peters, Emmanuelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Publisher B. V 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.07.005
_version_ 1783750570324000768
author Baumeister, David
Pillinger, Toby
Howes, Oliver
Peters, Emmanuelle
author_facet Baumeister, David
Pillinger, Toby
Howes, Oliver
Peters, Emmanuelle
author_sort Baumeister, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psychosis is associated with dysregulation of psychophysiological stress-reactivity, including in subjective, autonomic nervous system (ANS) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) parameters. AIMS: This study investigated whether dysregulated psychophysiological stress-reactivity is specifically associated with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) or psychosis more generally by comparing voice-hearers with and without a need for care. METHOD: Clinical (n = 20) and non-clinical voice-hearers (n = 23), as well as a healthy control group with no voices (n = 23), were compared on HPA and ANS responses, and subjective reactivity, to a psychophysiological stress paradigm, the socially evaluative cold pressor test. RESULTS: Measures of HPA function in both clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers diverged from non-voice-hearing controls. Clinical participants showed a blunted peak response compared to both non-clinical groups (p = 0.02), whilst non-clinical voice-hearers showed, at trend-level, reduced cortisol levels during stress exposure compared to both clinical voice-hearers (p = 0.07) and healthy controls (p = 0.07), who unexpectedly did not differ from each other (p = 0.97). Clinical participants showed greater subjective stress levels than both non-clinical groups (p < 0.001), as well as greater anticipatory stress (p = 0.001) and less recovery. There were no differences between groups on parameters of the ANS (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dysregulated psychophysiological stress-function is present in clinical voice-hearers, and partially discriminates them from non-clinical voice-hearers. Overall, the present findings identified specific potential psychophysiological markers of risk and resilience in auditory verbal hallucinations and need for care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8429638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Science Publisher B. V
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84296382021-09-14 Psychophysiological stress-reactivity in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers Baumeister, David Pillinger, Toby Howes, Oliver Peters, Emmanuelle Schizophr Res Article BACKGROUND: Psychosis is associated with dysregulation of psychophysiological stress-reactivity, including in subjective, autonomic nervous system (ANS) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) parameters. AIMS: This study investigated whether dysregulated psychophysiological stress-reactivity is specifically associated with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) or psychosis more generally by comparing voice-hearers with and without a need for care. METHOD: Clinical (n = 20) and non-clinical voice-hearers (n = 23), as well as a healthy control group with no voices (n = 23), were compared on HPA and ANS responses, and subjective reactivity, to a psychophysiological stress paradigm, the socially evaluative cold pressor test. RESULTS: Measures of HPA function in both clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers diverged from non-voice-hearing controls. Clinical participants showed a blunted peak response compared to both non-clinical groups (p = 0.02), whilst non-clinical voice-hearers showed, at trend-level, reduced cortisol levels during stress exposure compared to both clinical voice-hearers (p = 0.07) and healthy controls (p = 0.07), who unexpectedly did not differ from each other (p = 0.97). Clinical participants showed greater subjective stress levels than both non-clinical groups (p < 0.001), as well as greater anticipatory stress (p = 0.001) and less recovery. There were no differences between groups on parameters of the ANS (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dysregulated psychophysiological stress-function is present in clinical voice-hearers, and partially discriminates them from non-clinical voice-hearers. Overall, the present findings identified specific potential psychophysiological markers of risk and resilience in auditory verbal hallucinations and need for care. Elsevier Science Publisher B. V 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8429638/ /pubmed/34315061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.07.005 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Baumeister, David
Pillinger, Toby
Howes, Oliver
Peters, Emmanuelle
Psychophysiological stress-reactivity in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers
title Psychophysiological stress-reactivity in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers
title_full Psychophysiological stress-reactivity in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers
title_fullStr Psychophysiological stress-reactivity in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers
title_full_unstemmed Psychophysiological stress-reactivity in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers
title_short Psychophysiological stress-reactivity in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers
title_sort psychophysiological stress-reactivity in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.07.005
work_keys_str_mv AT baumeisterdavid psychophysiologicalstressreactivityinclinicalandnonclinicalvoicehearers
AT pillingertoby psychophysiologicalstressreactivityinclinicalandnonclinicalvoicehearers
AT howesoliver psychophysiologicalstressreactivityinclinicalandnonclinicalvoicehearers
AT petersemmanuelle psychophysiologicalstressreactivityinclinicalandnonclinicalvoicehearers