Cargando…

Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients

Background The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) recommended that during the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopy units perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for obstructive biliary pathologies in an emergency. We assessed the local performance of ERCP during the first wave o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gadour, Eyad, Agu, Okwudili, Musharaf, Mutwakil, Dixon, Megan, Askar, Amr, Hafeez, Siddrah, Shafiq, Yousuf, Arabiyat, Abdalla, Moradi, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522563
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17861
_version_ 1783750625964589056
author Gadour, Eyad
Agu, Okwudili
Musharaf, Mutwakil
Dixon, Megan
Askar, Amr
Hafeez, Siddrah
Shafiq, Yousuf
Arabiyat, Abdalla
Moradi, Julia
author_facet Gadour, Eyad
Agu, Okwudili
Musharaf, Mutwakil
Dixon, Megan
Askar, Amr
Hafeez, Siddrah
Shafiq, Yousuf
Arabiyat, Abdalla
Moradi, Julia
author_sort Gadour, Eyad
collection PubMed
description Background The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) recommended that during the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopy units perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for obstructive biliary pathologies in an emergency. We assessed the local performance of ERCP during the first wave of COVID-19 at our local endoscopy center, in particular the technique to common bile duct (CBD) cannulation. Methodology All ERCP procedures performed from January to June 2020 were retrospectively assessed and compared with procedures performed between January and June 2019 at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary. The indications for ERCP, success rate, and complications were studied separately. Correlation analysis was conducted using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The binary logistic regression model was used to compute the factors associated with successful ERCP. Significance was established when the two-sided P-value < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 2017). Results A total of 281 ERCP were included in this study, with 169 and 112 performed during the first six months of 2019 and 2020, respectively. A statistically significant (0.0087) higher proportion of cases with liver dysfunction presented for ERCP before the COVID-19 outbreak (152, 89.94%). All patients before COVID-19 underwent wire control-assisted ERCP, while 82 (73.21%) received assisted ERCP during the first wave (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.10) in the number of patients who underwent sphincterotomy before and during the first wave of COVID-19, with 97 (57.39%) and 76 (67.85%), respectively. The success rate of ERCP before COVID-19 was relatively high, accounting for 146 (86.39%) patients in contrast to 87 (77.67%) patients during the first wave (P = 0.074). Sphincterotomy (β = 2.800, P = 0.028) and stent insertion (β = 0.852, P = 0.046) were statistically significant predictors of ERCP outcomes. There was no statistically significant impact of cholangitis on the success of ERCP (β = 1.672, P = 0.109). Conclusion The first wave of COVID-19 had a statistically proven negative impact on the expected standards of ERCP performance. Although the complication rate was significantly higher during the first wave case difficulty, the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) status was not assessed on an individual basis. Both ASA status and case difficulty are now included in our endoscopy selection process. We recommend adding the complexity of cases and ASA to the local and national recording databases. This is a rare study on UK-based hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8429881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84298812021-09-13 Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients Gadour, Eyad Agu, Okwudili Musharaf, Mutwakil Dixon, Megan Askar, Amr Hafeez, Siddrah Shafiq, Yousuf Arabiyat, Abdalla Moradi, Julia Cureus Gastroenterology Background The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) recommended that during the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopy units perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for obstructive biliary pathologies in an emergency. We assessed the local performance of ERCP during the first wave of COVID-19 at our local endoscopy center, in particular the technique to common bile duct (CBD) cannulation. Methodology All ERCP procedures performed from January to June 2020 were retrospectively assessed and compared with procedures performed between January and June 2019 at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary. The indications for ERCP, success rate, and complications were studied separately. Correlation analysis was conducted using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The binary logistic regression model was used to compute the factors associated with successful ERCP. Significance was established when the two-sided P-value < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 2017). Results A total of 281 ERCP were included in this study, with 169 and 112 performed during the first six months of 2019 and 2020, respectively. A statistically significant (0.0087) higher proportion of cases with liver dysfunction presented for ERCP before the COVID-19 outbreak (152, 89.94%). All patients before COVID-19 underwent wire control-assisted ERCP, while 82 (73.21%) received assisted ERCP during the first wave (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.10) in the number of patients who underwent sphincterotomy before and during the first wave of COVID-19, with 97 (57.39%) and 76 (67.85%), respectively. The success rate of ERCP before COVID-19 was relatively high, accounting for 146 (86.39%) patients in contrast to 87 (77.67%) patients during the first wave (P = 0.074). Sphincterotomy (β = 2.800, P = 0.028) and stent insertion (β = 0.852, P = 0.046) were statistically significant predictors of ERCP outcomes. There was no statistically significant impact of cholangitis on the success of ERCP (β = 1.672, P = 0.109). Conclusion The first wave of COVID-19 had a statistically proven negative impact on the expected standards of ERCP performance. Although the complication rate was significantly higher during the first wave case difficulty, the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) status was not assessed on an individual basis. Both ASA status and case difficulty are now included in our endoscopy selection process. We recommend adding the complexity of cases and ASA to the local and national recording databases. This is a rare study on UK-based hospitals. Cureus 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8429881/ /pubmed/34522563 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17861 Text en Copyright © 2021, Gadour et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Gastroenterology
Gadour, Eyad
Agu, Okwudili
Musharaf, Mutwakil
Dixon, Megan
Askar, Amr
Hafeez, Siddrah
Shafiq, Yousuf
Arabiyat, Abdalla
Moradi, Julia
Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients
title Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients
title_full Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients
title_fullStr Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients
title_short Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients
title_sort success rate of wire control-assisted ercp sphincterotomy versus non-assisted ercp cannulation of common bile duct in a secondary care unit during the first covid-19 peak: a retrospective observational study of 281 patients
topic Gastroenterology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8429881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522563
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17861
work_keys_str_mv AT gadoureyad successrateofwirecontrolassistedercpsphincterotomyversusnonassistedercpcannulationofcommonbileductinasecondarycareunitduringthefirstcovid19peakaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof281patients
AT aguokwudili successrateofwirecontrolassistedercpsphincterotomyversusnonassistedercpcannulationofcommonbileductinasecondarycareunitduringthefirstcovid19peakaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof281patients
AT musharafmutwakil successrateofwirecontrolassistedercpsphincterotomyversusnonassistedercpcannulationofcommonbileductinasecondarycareunitduringthefirstcovid19peakaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof281patients
AT dixonmegan successrateofwirecontrolassistedercpsphincterotomyversusnonassistedercpcannulationofcommonbileductinasecondarycareunitduringthefirstcovid19peakaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof281patients
AT askaramr successrateofwirecontrolassistedercpsphincterotomyversusnonassistedercpcannulationofcommonbileductinasecondarycareunitduringthefirstcovid19peakaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof281patients
AT hafeezsiddrah successrateofwirecontrolassistedercpsphincterotomyversusnonassistedercpcannulationofcommonbileductinasecondarycareunitduringthefirstcovid19peakaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof281patients
AT shafiqyousuf successrateofwirecontrolassistedercpsphincterotomyversusnonassistedercpcannulationofcommonbileductinasecondarycareunitduringthefirstcovid19peakaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof281patients
AT arabiyatabdalla successrateofwirecontrolassistedercpsphincterotomyversusnonassistedercpcannulationofcommonbileductinasecondarycareunitduringthefirstcovid19peakaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof281patients
AT moradijulia successrateofwirecontrolassistedercpsphincterotomyversusnonassistedercpcannulationofcommonbileductinasecondarycareunitduringthefirstcovid19peakaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof281patients