Cargando…

Multilayer Watertight Closure to Address Adverse Events From Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Wound Closure Methods by Tissue Layer

BACKGROUND: Wound closure is a key, and often underrecognized, component of hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods for wound closure are an important consideration to better avoid wound-related adverse events; however, there is a lack of consensus on optimal methods. The objective of the following revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snyder, Mark A., Chen, Brian P., Hogan, Andrew, Wright, George W.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.05.015
_version_ 1783750701308968960
author Snyder, Mark A.
Chen, Brian P.
Hogan, Andrew
Wright, George W.J.
author_facet Snyder, Mark A.
Chen, Brian P.
Hogan, Andrew
Wright, George W.J.
author_sort Snyder, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wound closure is a key, and often underrecognized, component of hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods for wound closure are an important consideration to better avoid wound-related adverse events; however, there is a lack of consensus on optimal methods. The objective of the following review was twofold: to characterize the wound closure methods used by layer in the total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty literature and summarize optimal wound-healing strategies to address the risk of adverse events. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies reporting wound closure methods by layer and wound-healing adverse events (including superficial, deep, or periprosthetic joint infections, wound dehiscence, or prolonged wound drainage). Studies on revision procedures were excluded. Wound closure methods and adverse events were summarized qualitatively as meta-analyses were not possible because of study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Forty studies met the inclusion criteria: 22 randomized controlled trials and 18 observational studies. Across studies, 6 categories and 22 unique techniques for closure were identified. Conventional closure methods exhibited large ranges of adverse event rates. Studies of multilayer barbed sutures with topical skin adhesives and polyester mesh or multilayer antimicrobial sutures reported narrow ranges of adverse events rates. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability exists for wound closure methods, with a wide range reported in adverse events. Recent technologies and methods for standardized watertight, multilayer closure show promise for avoiding adverse events and unnecessary health-care costs; however, higher quality, comparative studies are required to enable future meta-analyses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8430424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84304242021-09-14 Multilayer Watertight Closure to Address Adverse Events From Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Wound Closure Methods by Tissue Layer Snyder, Mark A. Chen, Brian P. Hogan, Andrew Wright, George W.J. Arthroplast Today Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Wound closure is a key, and often underrecognized, component of hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods for wound closure are an important consideration to better avoid wound-related adverse events; however, there is a lack of consensus on optimal methods. The objective of the following review was twofold: to characterize the wound closure methods used by layer in the total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty literature and summarize optimal wound-healing strategies to address the risk of adverse events. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies reporting wound closure methods by layer and wound-healing adverse events (including superficial, deep, or periprosthetic joint infections, wound dehiscence, or prolonged wound drainage). Studies on revision procedures were excluded. Wound closure methods and adverse events were summarized qualitatively as meta-analyses were not possible because of study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Forty studies met the inclusion criteria: 22 randomized controlled trials and 18 observational studies. Across studies, 6 categories and 22 unique techniques for closure were identified. Conventional closure methods exhibited large ranges of adverse event rates. Studies of multilayer barbed sutures with topical skin adhesives and polyester mesh or multilayer antimicrobial sutures reported narrow ranges of adverse events rates. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability exists for wound closure methods, with a wide range reported in adverse events. Recent technologies and methods for standardized watertight, multilayer closure show promise for avoiding adverse events and unnecessary health-care costs; however, higher quality, comparative studies are required to enable future meta-analyses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Elsevier 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8430424/ /pubmed/34527801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.05.015 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Snyder, Mark A.
Chen, Brian P.
Hogan, Andrew
Wright, George W.J.
Multilayer Watertight Closure to Address Adverse Events From Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Wound Closure Methods by Tissue Layer
title Multilayer Watertight Closure to Address Adverse Events From Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Wound Closure Methods by Tissue Layer
title_full Multilayer Watertight Closure to Address Adverse Events From Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Wound Closure Methods by Tissue Layer
title_fullStr Multilayer Watertight Closure to Address Adverse Events From Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Wound Closure Methods by Tissue Layer
title_full_unstemmed Multilayer Watertight Closure to Address Adverse Events From Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Wound Closure Methods by Tissue Layer
title_short Multilayer Watertight Closure to Address Adverse Events From Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Wound Closure Methods by Tissue Layer
title_sort multilayer watertight closure to address adverse events from primary total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of wound closure methods by tissue layer
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.05.015
work_keys_str_mv AT snydermarka multilayerwatertightclosuretoaddressadverseeventsfromprimarytotalkneeandhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewofwoundclosuremethodsbytissuelayer
AT chenbrianp multilayerwatertightclosuretoaddressadverseeventsfromprimarytotalkneeandhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewofwoundclosuremethodsbytissuelayer
AT hoganandrew multilayerwatertightclosuretoaddressadverseeventsfromprimarytotalkneeandhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewofwoundclosuremethodsbytissuelayer
AT wrightgeorgewj multilayerwatertightclosuretoaddressadverseeventsfromprimarytotalkneeandhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewofwoundclosuremethodsbytissuelayer