Cargando…
Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease patient positioning time for localized prostate cancer patients compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup method. The patient setup accuracy was also compared between the two setup me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001 |
_version_ | 1783750701773488128 |
---|---|
author | Mannerberg, Annika Kügele, Malin Hamid, Sandra Edvardsson, Anneli Petersson, Kristoffer Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn Bäck, Sven Å.J. Engelholm, Silke Ceberg, Sofie |
author_facet | Mannerberg, Annika Kügele, Malin Hamid, Sandra Edvardsson, Anneli Petersson, Kristoffer Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn Bäck, Sven Å.J. Engelholm, Silke Ceberg, Sofie |
author_sort | Mannerberg, Annika |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease patient positioning time for localized prostate cancer patients compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup method. The patient setup accuracy was also compared between the two setup methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 localized prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this study, where 20 patients were positioned with surface imaging (SI) and 20 patients were positioned with 3-point localization. The setup time was obtained from the system log files of the linear accelerator and compared between the two methods. The patient setup was verified with daily orthogonal kV images which were matched based on the implanted gold fiducial markers. Resulting setup deviations between planned and online positions were compared between SI and 3-point localization. RESULTS: Median setup time was 2:50 min and 3:28 min for SI and 3-point localization, respectively (p < 0.001). The median vector offset was 4.7 mm (range: 0–10.4 mm) for SI and 5.2 mm for 3-point localization (range: 0.41–17.3 mm) (p = 0.01). Median setup deviation in the individual translations for SI and 3-point localization respectively was: 1.1 mm and 1.9 mm in lateral direction (p = 0.02), 1.8 and 1.6 mm in the longitudinal direction (p = 0.41) and 2.2 mm and 2.6 mm in the vertical direction (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Using SGRT for positioning of prostate cancer patients provided a faster and more accurate patient positioning compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8430426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84304262021-09-14 Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients Mannerberg, Annika Kügele, Malin Hamid, Sandra Edvardsson, Anneli Petersson, Kristoffer Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn Bäck, Sven Å.J. Engelholm, Silke Ceberg, Sofie Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Research Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease patient positioning time for localized prostate cancer patients compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup method. The patient setup accuracy was also compared between the two setup methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 localized prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this study, where 20 patients were positioned with surface imaging (SI) and 20 patients were positioned with 3-point localization. The setup time was obtained from the system log files of the linear accelerator and compared between the two methods. The patient setup was verified with daily orthogonal kV images which were matched based on the implanted gold fiducial markers. Resulting setup deviations between planned and online positions were compared between SI and 3-point localization. RESULTS: Median setup time was 2:50 min and 3:28 min for SI and 3-point localization, respectively (p < 0.001). The median vector offset was 4.7 mm (range: 0–10.4 mm) for SI and 5.2 mm for 3-point localization (range: 0.41–17.3 mm) (p = 0.01). Median setup deviation in the individual translations for SI and 3-point localization respectively was: 1.1 mm and 1.9 mm in lateral direction (p = 0.02), 1.8 and 1.6 mm in the longitudinal direction (p = 0.41) and 2.2 mm and 2.6 mm in the vertical direction (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Using SGRT for positioning of prostate cancer patients provided a faster and more accurate patient positioning compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup. Elsevier 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8430426/ /pubmed/34527818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mannerberg, Annika Kügele, Malin Hamid, Sandra Edvardsson, Anneli Petersson, Kristoffer Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn Bäck, Sven Å.J. Engelholm, Silke Ceberg, Sofie Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients |
title | Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients |
title_full | Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients |
title_short | Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients |
title_sort | faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mannerbergannika fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients AT kugelemalin fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients AT hamidsandra fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients AT edvardssonanneli fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients AT peterssonkristoffer fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients AT gunnlaugssonadalsteinn fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients AT backsvenaj fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients AT engelholmsilke fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients AT cebergsofie fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients |