Cargando…

Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease patient positioning time for localized prostate cancer patients compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup method. The patient setup accuracy was also compared between the two setup me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mannerberg, Annika, Kügele, Malin, Hamid, Sandra, Edvardsson, Anneli, Petersson, Kristoffer, Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn, Bäck, Sven Å.J., Engelholm, Silke, Ceberg, Sofie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001
_version_ 1783750701773488128
author Mannerberg, Annika
Kügele, Malin
Hamid, Sandra
Edvardsson, Anneli
Petersson, Kristoffer
Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn
Bäck, Sven Å.J.
Engelholm, Silke
Ceberg, Sofie
author_facet Mannerberg, Annika
Kügele, Malin
Hamid, Sandra
Edvardsson, Anneli
Petersson, Kristoffer
Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn
Bäck, Sven Å.J.
Engelholm, Silke
Ceberg, Sofie
author_sort Mannerberg, Annika
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease patient positioning time for localized prostate cancer patients compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup method. The patient setup accuracy was also compared between the two setup methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 localized prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this study, where 20 patients were positioned with surface imaging (SI) and 20 patients were positioned with 3-point localization. The setup time was obtained from the system log files of the linear accelerator and compared between the two methods. The patient setup was verified with daily orthogonal kV images which were matched based on the implanted gold fiducial markers. Resulting setup deviations between planned and online positions were compared between SI and 3-point localization. RESULTS: Median setup time was 2:50 min and 3:28 min for SI and 3-point localization, respectively (p < 0.001). The median vector offset was 4.7 mm (range: 0–10.4 mm) for SI and 5.2 mm for 3-point localization (range: 0.41–17.3 mm) (p = 0.01). Median setup deviation in the individual translations for SI and 3-point localization respectively was: 1.1 mm and 1.9 mm in lateral direction (p = 0.02), 1.8 and 1.6 mm in the longitudinal direction (p = 0.41) and 2.2 mm and 2.6 mm in the vertical direction (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Using SGRT for positioning of prostate cancer patients provided a faster and more accurate patient positioning compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8430426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84304262021-09-14 Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients Mannerberg, Annika Kügele, Malin Hamid, Sandra Edvardsson, Anneli Petersson, Kristoffer Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn Bäck, Sven Å.J. Engelholm, Silke Ceberg, Sofie Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Research Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease patient positioning time for localized prostate cancer patients compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup method. The patient setup accuracy was also compared between the two setup methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 localized prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this study, where 20 patients were positioned with surface imaging (SI) and 20 patients were positioned with 3-point localization. The setup time was obtained from the system log files of the linear accelerator and compared between the two methods. The patient setup was verified with daily orthogonal kV images which were matched based on the implanted gold fiducial markers. Resulting setup deviations between planned and online positions were compared between SI and 3-point localization. RESULTS: Median setup time was 2:50 min and 3:28 min for SI and 3-point localization, respectively (p < 0.001). The median vector offset was 4.7 mm (range: 0–10.4 mm) for SI and 5.2 mm for 3-point localization (range: 0.41–17.3 mm) (p = 0.01). Median setup deviation in the individual translations for SI and 3-point localization respectively was: 1.1 mm and 1.9 mm in lateral direction (p = 0.02), 1.8 and 1.6 mm in the longitudinal direction (p = 0.41) and 2.2 mm and 2.6 mm in the vertical direction (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Using SGRT for positioning of prostate cancer patients provided a faster and more accurate patient positioning compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup. Elsevier 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8430426/ /pubmed/34527818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Mannerberg, Annika
Kügele, Malin
Hamid, Sandra
Edvardsson, Anneli
Petersson, Kristoffer
Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn
Bäck, Sven Å.J.
Engelholm, Silke
Ceberg, Sofie
Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients
title Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients
title_full Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients
title_fullStr Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients
title_short Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients
title_sort faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001
work_keys_str_mv AT mannerbergannika fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients
AT kugelemalin fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients
AT hamidsandra fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients
AT edvardssonanneli fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients
AT peterssonkristoffer fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients
AT gunnlaugssonadalsteinn fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients
AT backsvenaj fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients
AT engelholmsilke fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients
AT cebergsofie fasterandmoreaccuratepatientpositioningwithsurfaceguidedradiotherapyforultrahypofractionatedprostatecancerpatients