Cargando…

Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

We quantified the effectiveness of an oral health intervention among home care recipients. Seven German insurance funds invited home care recipients to participate in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. At t(0), the treatment group (TG) received an intervention comprising an oral health assessmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Czwikla, Jonas, Herzberg, Alexandra, Kapp, Sonja, Kloep, Stephan, Rothgang, Heinz, Nitschke, Ina, Haffner, Cornelius, Hoffmann, Falk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179339
_version_ 1783750726334283776
author Czwikla, Jonas
Herzberg, Alexandra
Kapp, Sonja
Kloep, Stephan
Rothgang, Heinz
Nitschke, Ina
Haffner, Cornelius
Hoffmann, Falk
author_facet Czwikla, Jonas
Herzberg, Alexandra
Kapp, Sonja
Kloep, Stephan
Rothgang, Heinz
Nitschke, Ina
Haffner, Cornelius
Hoffmann, Falk
author_sort Czwikla, Jonas
collection PubMed
description We quantified the effectiveness of an oral health intervention among home care recipients. Seven German insurance funds invited home care recipients to participate in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. At t(0), the treatment group (TG) received an intervention comprising an oral health assessment, dental treatment recommendations and oral health education. The control group (CG) received usual care. At t(1), blinded observers assessed objective (Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT)) and subjective (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)) oral health and the objective periodontal situation (Periodontal Screening Index (PSI)). Of 9656 invited individuals, 527 (5.5%) participated. In the TG, 164 of 259 (63.3%) participants received the intervention and 112 (43.2%) received an outcome assessment. In the CG, 137 of 268 (51.1%) participants received an outcome assessment. The OHAT mean score (2.83 vs. 3.31, p = 0.0665) and the OHIP mean score (8.92 vs. 7.99, p = 0.1884) did not differ significantly. The prevalence of any periodontal problems (77.1% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.0027) was significantly lower in the TG than in the CG, but the prevalence of periodontitis was not (35.4% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.1764). Future studies should investigate whether other recruitment strategies and a more comprehensive intervention might be more successful in improving oral health among home care recipients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8430536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84305362021-09-11 Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Czwikla, Jonas Herzberg, Alexandra Kapp, Sonja Kloep, Stephan Rothgang, Heinz Nitschke, Ina Haffner, Cornelius Hoffmann, Falk Int J Environ Res Public Health Article We quantified the effectiveness of an oral health intervention among home care recipients. Seven German insurance funds invited home care recipients to participate in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. At t(0), the treatment group (TG) received an intervention comprising an oral health assessment, dental treatment recommendations and oral health education. The control group (CG) received usual care. At t(1), blinded observers assessed objective (Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT)) and subjective (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)) oral health and the objective periodontal situation (Periodontal Screening Index (PSI)). Of 9656 invited individuals, 527 (5.5%) participated. In the TG, 164 of 259 (63.3%) participants received the intervention and 112 (43.2%) received an outcome assessment. In the CG, 137 of 268 (51.1%) participants received an outcome assessment. The OHAT mean score (2.83 vs. 3.31, p = 0.0665) and the OHIP mean score (8.92 vs. 7.99, p = 0.1884) did not differ significantly. The prevalence of any periodontal problems (77.1% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.0027) was significantly lower in the TG than in the CG, but the prevalence of periodontitis was not (35.4% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.1764). Future studies should investigate whether other recruitment strategies and a more comprehensive intervention might be more successful in improving oral health among home care recipients. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8430536/ /pubmed/34501925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179339 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Czwikla, Jonas
Herzberg, Alexandra
Kapp, Sonja
Kloep, Stephan
Rothgang, Heinz
Nitschke, Ina
Haffner, Cornelius
Hoffmann, Falk
Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effectiveness of a dental intervention to improve oral health among home care recipients: a randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179339
work_keys_str_mv AT czwiklajonas effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT herzbergalexandra effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kappsonja effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kloepstephan effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rothgangheinz effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nitschkeina effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haffnercornelius effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hoffmannfalk effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial