Cargando…
Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
We quantified the effectiveness of an oral health intervention among home care recipients. Seven German insurance funds invited home care recipients to participate in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. At t(0), the treatment group (TG) received an intervention comprising an oral health assessmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179339 |
_version_ | 1783750726334283776 |
---|---|
author | Czwikla, Jonas Herzberg, Alexandra Kapp, Sonja Kloep, Stephan Rothgang, Heinz Nitschke, Ina Haffner, Cornelius Hoffmann, Falk |
author_facet | Czwikla, Jonas Herzberg, Alexandra Kapp, Sonja Kloep, Stephan Rothgang, Heinz Nitschke, Ina Haffner, Cornelius Hoffmann, Falk |
author_sort | Czwikla, Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | We quantified the effectiveness of an oral health intervention among home care recipients. Seven German insurance funds invited home care recipients to participate in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. At t(0), the treatment group (TG) received an intervention comprising an oral health assessment, dental treatment recommendations and oral health education. The control group (CG) received usual care. At t(1), blinded observers assessed objective (Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT)) and subjective (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)) oral health and the objective periodontal situation (Periodontal Screening Index (PSI)). Of 9656 invited individuals, 527 (5.5%) participated. In the TG, 164 of 259 (63.3%) participants received the intervention and 112 (43.2%) received an outcome assessment. In the CG, 137 of 268 (51.1%) participants received an outcome assessment. The OHAT mean score (2.83 vs. 3.31, p = 0.0665) and the OHIP mean score (8.92 vs. 7.99, p = 0.1884) did not differ significantly. The prevalence of any periodontal problems (77.1% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.0027) was significantly lower in the TG than in the CG, but the prevalence of periodontitis was not (35.4% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.1764). Future studies should investigate whether other recruitment strategies and a more comprehensive intervention might be more successful in improving oral health among home care recipients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8430536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84305362021-09-11 Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Czwikla, Jonas Herzberg, Alexandra Kapp, Sonja Kloep, Stephan Rothgang, Heinz Nitschke, Ina Haffner, Cornelius Hoffmann, Falk Int J Environ Res Public Health Article We quantified the effectiveness of an oral health intervention among home care recipients. Seven German insurance funds invited home care recipients to participate in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. At t(0), the treatment group (TG) received an intervention comprising an oral health assessment, dental treatment recommendations and oral health education. The control group (CG) received usual care. At t(1), blinded observers assessed objective (Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT)) and subjective (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)) oral health and the objective periodontal situation (Periodontal Screening Index (PSI)). Of 9656 invited individuals, 527 (5.5%) participated. In the TG, 164 of 259 (63.3%) participants received the intervention and 112 (43.2%) received an outcome assessment. In the CG, 137 of 268 (51.1%) participants received an outcome assessment. The OHAT mean score (2.83 vs. 3.31, p = 0.0665) and the OHIP mean score (8.92 vs. 7.99, p = 0.1884) did not differ significantly. The prevalence of any periodontal problems (77.1% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.0027) was significantly lower in the TG than in the CG, but the prevalence of periodontitis was not (35.4% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.1764). Future studies should investigate whether other recruitment strategies and a more comprehensive intervention might be more successful in improving oral health among home care recipients. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8430536/ /pubmed/34501925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179339 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Czwikla, Jonas Herzberg, Alexandra Kapp, Sonja Kloep, Stephan Rothgang, Heinz Nitschke, Ina Haffner, Cornelius Hoffmann, Falk Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of a Dental Intervention to Improve Oral Health among Home Care Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of a dental intervention to improve oral health among home care recipients: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT czwiklajonas effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT herzbergalexandra effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kappsonja effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kloepstephan effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rothgangheinz effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nitschkeina effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT haffnercornelius effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoffmannfalk effectivenessofadentalinterventiontoimproveoralhealthamonghomecarerecipientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |