Cargando…

Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this study is to establish the absolute reliability between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and concurrent validity between HHDs and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in shoulder rotator strength assessment. The Medline, CINAHL, and Central databases were searched for relevant studies up to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chamorro, Claudio, Arancibia, Miguel, Trigo, Benjamín, Arias-Poblete, Leónidas, Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501883
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179293
_version_ 1783750733637615616
author Chamorro, Claudio
Arancibia, Miguel
Trigo, Benjamín
Arias-Poblete, Leónidas
Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel
author_facet Chamorro, Claudio
Arancibia, Miguel
Trigo, Benjamín
Arias-Poblete, Leónidas
Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel
author_sort Chamorro, Claudio
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to establish the absolute reliability between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and concurrent validity between HHDs and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in shoulder rotator strength assessment. The Medline, CINAHL, and Central databases were searched for relevant studies up to July 2020. Absolute reliability was determined by test–retest studies presenting standard error of measurement (SEM%) and/or minimal detectable change (MDC%) expressed as percentage of the mean. Studies considering intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between IDs and HHDs were considered for concurrent validity. The risk of bias and the methodological quality were evaluated according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Shoulder internal rotator strength assessment MDC% was 0.78%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −5.21 to 3.66, while shoulder external rotators MDC% was 3.29%, CI −2.69 to 9.27. ICC between devices was 0.94, CI (0.91 to 0.96) for shoulder internal rotators and 0.92, IC (0.88 to 0.97) for shoulder external rotators. Very high correlation was found for shoulder rotator torque assessment between HHDs and IDs. The COSMIN checklist classified the selected studies as adequate and inadequate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8430567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84305672021-09-11 Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Chamorro, Claudio Arancibia, Miguel Trigo, Benjamín Arias-Poblete, Leónidas Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The purpose of this study is to establish the absolute reliability between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and concurrent validity between HHDs and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in shoulder rotator strength assessment. The Medline, CINAHL, and Central databases were searched for relevant studies up to July 2020. Absolute reliability was determined by test–retest studies presenting standard error of measurement (SEM%) and/or minimal detectable change (MDC%) expressed as percentage of the mean. Studies considering intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between IDs and HHDs were considered for concurrent validity. The risk of bias and the methodological quality were evaluated according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Shoulder internal rotator strength assessment MDC% was 0.78%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −5.21 to 3.66, while shoulder external rotators MDC% was 3.29%, CI −2.69 to 9.27. ICC between devices was 0.94, CI (0.91 to 0.96) for shoulder internal rotators and 0.92, IC (0.88 to 0.97) for shoulder external rotators. Very high correlation was found for shoulder rotator torque assessment between HHDs and IDs. The COSMIN checklist classified the selected studies as adequate and inadequate. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8430567/ /pubmed/34501883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179293 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chamorro, Claudio
Arancibia, Miguel
Trigo, Benjamín
Arias-Poblete, Leónidas
Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel
Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand-held dynamometry in shoulder rotator strength assessment: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501883
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179293
work_keys_str_mv AT chamorroclaudio absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT arancibiamiguel absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT trigobenjamin absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ariaspobleteleonidas absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jerezmayorgadaniel absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis