Cargando…
Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
The purpose of this study is to establish the absolute reliability between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and concurrent validity between HHDs and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in shoulder rotator strength assessment. The Medline, CINAHL, and Central databases were searched for relevant studies up to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179293 |
_version_ | 1783750733637615616 |
---|---|
author | Chamorro, Claudio Arancibia, Miguel Trigo, Benjamín Arias-Poblete, Leónidas Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel |
author_facet | Chamorro, Claudio Arancibia, Miguel Trigo, Benjamín Arias-Poblete, Leónidas Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel |
author_sort | Chamorro, Claudio |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to establish the absolute reliability between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and concurrent validity between HHDs and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in shoulder rotator strength assessment. The Medline, CINAHL, and Central databases were searched for relevant studies up to July 2020. Absolute reliability was determined by test–retest studies presenting standard error of measurement (SEM%) and/or minimal detectable change (MDC%) expressed as percentage of the mean. Studies considering intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between IDs and HHDs were considered for concurrent validity. The risk of bias and the methodological quality were evaluated according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Shoulder internal rotator strength assessment MDC% was 0.78%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −5.21 to 3.66, while shoulder external rotators MDC% was 3.29%, CI −2.69 to 9.27. ICC between devices was 0.94, CI (0.91 to 0.96) for shoulder internal rotators and 0.92, IC (0.88 to 0.97) for shoulder external rotators. Very high correlation was found for shoulder rotator torque assessment between HHDs and IDs. The COSMIN checklist classified the selected studies as adequate and inadequate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8430567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84305672021-09-11 Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Chamorro, Claudio Arancibia, Miguel Trigo, Benjamín Arias-Poblete, Leónidas Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The purpose of this study is to establish the absolute reliability between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and concurrent validity between HHDs and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in shoulder rotator strength assessment. The Medline, CINAHL, and Central databases were searched for relevant studies up to July 2020. Absolute reliability was determined by test–retest studies presenting standard error of measurement (SEM%) and/or minimal detectable change (MDC%) expressed as percentage of the mean. Studies considering intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between IDs and HHDs were considered for concurrent validity. The risk of bias and the methodological quality were evaluated according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Shoulder internal rotator strength assessment MDC% was 0.78%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −5.21 to 3.66, while shoulder external rotators MDC% was 3.29%, CI −2.69 to 9.27. ICC between devices was 0.94, CI (0.91 to 0.96) for shoulder internal rotators and 0.92, IC (0.88 to 0.97) for shoulder external rotators. Very high correlation was found for shoulder rotator torque assessment between HHDs and IDs. The COSMIN checklist classified the selected studies as adequate and inadequate. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8430567/ /pubmed/34501883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179293 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Chamorro, Claudio Arancibia, Miguel Trigo, Benjamín Arias-Poblete, Leónidas Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry in Shoulder Rotator Strength Assessment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand-held dynamometry in shoulder rotator strength assessment: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chamorroclaudio absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arancibiamiguel absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT trigobenjamin absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ariaspobleteleonidas absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jerezmayorgadaniel absolutereliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofhandhelddynamometryinshoulderrotatorstrengthassessmentsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |