Cargando…
Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Currently, response rates in multiple myeloma (MM) have increased dramatically, with more than 50% otablef those who respond satisfying complete response criteria. Achieving frequent deep responses has necessarily led to test conceptual advantages for assessing and treating MM patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174332 |
_version_ | 1783750751589236736 |
---|---|
author | Bravo-Pérez, Carlos Sola, María Teruel-Montoya, Raúl García-Malo, María Dolores Ortuño, Francisco José Vicente, Vicente de Arriba, Felipe Jerez, Andrés |
author_facet | Bravo-Pérez, Carlos Sola, María Teruel-Montoya, Raúl García-Malo, María Dolores Ortuño, Francisco José Vicente, Vicente de Arriba, Felipe Jerez, Andrés |
author_sort | Bravo-Pérez, Carlos |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Currently, response rates in multiple myeloma (MM) have increased dramatically, with more than 50% otablef those who respond satisfying complete response criteria. Achieving frequent deep responses has necessarily led to test conceptual advantages for assessing and treating MM patients with only minimal residual disease (MRD). In this review, we present and discuss the clinical relevance, methodology, and challenges for measuring MRD in MM. ABSTRACT: The game-changing outcome effect, due to the generalized use of novel agents in MM, has cre-ated a paradigm shift. Achieving frequent deep responses has placed MM among those neoplasms where the rationale for assessing MRD is fulfilled. However, its implementation in MM has raised specific questions: how might we weight standard measures against deep MRD in the emerging CAR-T setting? Which high sensitivity method to choose? Are current response criteria still useful? In this work, we address lessons learned from the use of MRD in other neoplasms, the steps followed for the harmonization of current methods for comprehensively measuring MRD, and the challenges that new therapies and concepts pose in the MM clinical field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8430644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84306442021-09-11 Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New Bravo-Pérez, Carlos Sola, María Teruel-Montoya, Raúl García-Malo, María Dolores Ortuño, Francisco José Vicente, Vicente de Arriba, Felipe Jerez, Andrés Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Currently, response rates in multiple myeloma (MM) have increased dramatically, with more than 50% otablef those who respond satisfying complete response criteria. Achieving frequent deep responses has necessarily led to test conceptual advantages for assessing and treating MM patients with only minimal residual disease (MRD). In this review, we present and discuss the clinical relevance, methodology, and challenges for measuring MRD in MM. ABSTRACT: The game-changing outcome effect, due to the generalized use of novel agents in MM, has cre-ated a paradigm shift. Achieving frequent deep responses has placed MM among those neoplasms where the rationale for assessing MRD is fulfilled. However, its implementation in MM has raised specific questions: how might we weight standard measures against deep MRD in the emerging CAR-T setting? Which high sensitivity method to choose? Are current response criteria still useful? In this work, we address lessons learned from the use of MRD in other neoplasms, the steps followed for the harmonization of current methods for comprehensively measuring MRD, and the challenges that new therapies and concepts pose in the MM clinical field. MDPI 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8430644/ /pubmed/34503142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174332 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Bravo-Pérez, Carlos Sola, María Teruel-Montoya, Raúl García-Malo, María Dolores Ortuño, Francisco José Vicente, Vicente de Arriba, Felipe Jerez, Andrés Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New |
title | Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New |
title_full | Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New |
title_fullStr | Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New |
title_short | Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New |
title_sort | minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: something old, something new |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bravoperezcarlos minimalresidualdiseaseinmultiplemyelomasomethingoldsomethingnew AT solamaria minimalresidualdiseaseinmultiplemyelomasomethingoldsomethingnew AT teruelmontoyaraul minimalresidualdiseaseinmultiplemyelomasomethingoldsomethingnew AT garciamalomariadolores minimalresidualdiseaseinmultiplemyelomasomethingoldsomethingnew AT ortunofranciscojose minimalresidualdiseaseinmultiplemyelomasomethingoldsomethingnew AT vicentevicente minimalresidualdiseaseinmultiplemyelomasomethingoldsomethingnew AT dearribafelipe minimalresidualdiseaseinmultiplemyelomasomethingoldsomethingnew AT jerezandres minimalresidualdiseaseinmultiplemyelomasomethingoldsomethingnew |