Cargando…
Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study
For COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic after the acute phase, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended. However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of PR, especially considering the duration between the acute phase of COVID-19 and the onset of rehabilitation, as well as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179001 |
_version_ | 1783750799282667520 |
---|---|
author | Hayden, Markus C. Limbach, Matthias Schuler, Michael Merkl, Steffen Schwarzl, Gabriele Jakab, Katalin Nowak, Dennis Schultz, Konrad |
author_facet | Hayden, Markus C. Limbach, Matthias Schuler, Michael Merkl, Steffen Schwarzl, Gabriele Jakab, Katalin Nowak, Dennis Schultz, Konrad |
author_sort | Hayden, Markus C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | For COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic after the acute phase, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended. However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of PR, especially considering the duration between the acute phase of COVID-19 and the onset of rehabilitation, as well as the initial severity. This prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of PR in patients after COVID-19. A total of 120 still-symptomatic patients referred for PR after overcoming acute COVID-19 were asked to participate, of whom 108 (mean age 55.6 ± 10.1 years, 45.4% female) consented. The patients were assigned to three groups according to the time of referral and initial disease severity (severe acute; severe after interval; mild after interval). The primary outcome was dyspnea. Secondary outcomes included other respiratory disease symptoms, physical capacity, lung function, fatigue, quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, patients rated the overall effectiveness of PR and their subjective change in health status. At the end of PR, we detected improvements with large effect sizes in exertional dyspnea, physical capacity, QoL, fatigue, and depression in the overall group. Other parameters changed with small to medium effect sizes. PR was effective after acute COVID-19 in all three groups analyzed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8430843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84308432021-09-11 Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study Hayden, Markus C. Limbach, Matthias Schuler, Michael Merkl, Steffen Schwarzl, Gabriele Jakab, Katalin Nowak, Dennis Schultz, Konrad Int J Environ Res Public Health Article For COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic after the acute phase, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended. However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of PR, especially considering the duration between the acute phase of COVID-19 and the onset of rehabilitation, as well as the initial severity. This prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of PR in patients after COVID-19. A total of 120 still-symptomatic patients referred for PR after overcoming acute COVID-19 were asked to participate, of whom 108 (mean age 55.6 ± 10.1 years, 45.4% female) consented. The patients were assigned to three groups according to the time of referral and initial disease severity (severe acute; severe after interval; mild after interval). The primary outcome was dyspnea. Secondary outcomes included other respiratory disease symptoms, physical capacity, lung function, fatigue, quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, patients rated the overall effectiveness of PR and their subjective change in health status. At the end of PR, we detected improvements with large effect sizes in exertional dyspnea, physical capacity, QoL, fatigue, and depression in the overall group. Other parameters changed with small to medium effect sizes. PR was effective after acute COVID-19 in all three groups analyzed. MDPI 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8430843/ /pubmed/34501596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179001 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hayden, Markus C. Limbach, Matthias Schuler, Michael Merkl, Steffen Schwarzl, Gabriele Jakab, Katalin Nowak, Dennis Schultz, Konrad Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study |
title | Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full | Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_short | Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_sort | effectiveness of a three-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program for patients after covid-19: a prospective observational study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haydenmarkusc effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy AT limbachmatthias effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy AT schulermichael effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy AT merklsteffen effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy AT schwarzlgabriele effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy AT jakabkatalin effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy AT nowakdennis effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy AT schultzkonrad effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy |