Cargando…

Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study

For COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic after the acute phase, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended. However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of PR, especially considering the duration between the acute phase of COVID-19 and the onset of rehabilitation, as well as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayden, Markus C., Limbach, Matthias, Schuler, Michael, Merkl, Steffen, Schwarzl, Gabriele, Jakab, Katalin, Nowak, Dennis, Schultz, Konrad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179001
_version_ 1783750799282667520
author Hayden, Markus C.
Limbach, Matthias
Schuler, Michael
Merkl, Steffen
Schwarzl, Gabriele
Jakab, Katalin
Nowak, Dennis
Schultz, Konrad
author_facet Hayden, Markus C.
Limbach, Matthias
Schuler, Michael
Merkl, Steffen
Schwarzl, Gabriele
Jakab, Katalin
Nowak, Dennis
Schultz, Konrad
author_sort Hayden, Markus C.
collection PubMed
description For COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic after the acute phase, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended. However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of PR, especially considering the duration between the acute phase of COVID-19 and the onset of rehabilitation, as well as the initial severity. This prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of PR in patients after COVID-19. A total of 120 still-symptomatic patients referred for PR after overcoming acute COVID-19 were asked to participate, of whom 108 (mean age 55.6 ± 10.1 years, 45.4% female) consented. The patients were assigned to three groups according to the time of referral and initial disease severity (severe acute; severe after interval; mild after interval). The primary outcome was dyspnea. Secondary outcomes included other respiratory disease symptoms, physical capacity, lung function, fatigue, quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, patients rated the overall effectiveness of PR and their subjective change in health status. At the end of PR, we detected improvements with large effect sizes in exertional dyspnea, physical capacity, QoL, fatigue, and depression in the overall group. Other parameters changed with small to medium effect sizes. PR was effective after acute COVID-19 in all three groups analyzed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8430843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84308432021-09-11 Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study Hayden, Markus C. Limbach, Matthias Schuler, Michael Merkl, Steffen Schwarzl, Gabriele Jakab, Katalin Nowak, Dennis Schultz, Konrad Int J Environ Res Public Health Article For COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic after the acute phase, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended. However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of PR, especially considering the duration between the acute phase of COVID-19 and the onset of rehabilitation, as well as the initial severity. This prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of PR in patients after COVID-19. A total of 120 still-symptomatic patients referred for PR after overcoming acute COVID-19 were asked to participate, of whom 108 (mean age 55.6 ± 10.1 years, 45.4% female) consented. The patients were assigned to three groups according to the time of referral and initial disease severity (severe acute; severe after interval; mild after interval). The primary outcome was dyspnea. Secondary outcomes included other respiratory disease symptoms, physical capacity, lung function, fatigue, quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, patients rated the overall effectiveness of PR and their subjective change in health status. At the end of PR, we detected improvements with large effect sizes in exertional dyspnea, physical capacity, QoL, fatigue, and depression in the overall group. Other parameters changed with small to medium effect sizes. PR was effective after acute COVID-19 in all three groups analyzed. MDPI 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8430843/ /pubmed/34501596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179001 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hayden, Markus C.
Limbach, Matthias
Schuler, Michael
Merkl, Steffen
Schwarzl, Gabriele
Jakab, Katalin
Nowak, Dennis
Schultz, Konrad
Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study
title Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort effectiveness of a three-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program for patients after covid-19: a prospective observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8430843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179001
work_keys_str_mv AT haydenmarkusc effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT limbachmatthias effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT schulermichael effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT merklsteffen effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT schwarzlgabriele effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT jakabkatalin effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nowakdennis effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT schultzkonrad effectivenessofathreeweekinpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationprogramforpatientsaftercovid19aprospectiveobservationalstudy