Cargando…
Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services
Background: The waiting time (WT) for a phlebotomy is directly related to patient satisfaction with a health service. However, the processing time varies widely depending on the type of patients. Monitoring of the WT alone may not enable an effective evaluation of the lean performance of the medical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8431132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179386 |
_version_ | 1783750865240195072 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Ming-Feng Li, Jen-Ying Lin, Yu-Hsuan Huang, Wei-Chang He, Chi-Chih Wang, Jiunn-Min |
author_facet | Wu, Ming-Feng Li, Jen-Ying Lin, Yu-Hsuan Huang, Wei-Chang He, Chi-Chih Wang, Jiunn-Min |
author_sort | Wu, Ming-Feng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The waiting time (WT) for a phlebotomy is directly related to patient satisfaction with a health service. However, the processing time varies widely depending on the type of patients. Monitoring of the WT alone may not enable an effective evaluation of the lean performance of the medical staff for patients with different characteristics. The objective of this study was to use process cycle efficiency (PCE) to assess the performance of an intelligent tube preparation system (ITPS) which automatically labeled test tubes and conducted patient rerouting for phlebotomy services, and to interpret the WT during peak hours. Methods: Three time periods were used. The baseline period was from 1 July to 31 July 2014. Phase 1 was after the establishment of the ITPS, with patients ≥80 years old being rerouted. In phase 2, patients ≥78 years old were rerouted. Those data were recorded with a calling system and ITPS, respectively. Results: PCE was significantly improved from 12.9% at baseline to 51.1% (p < 0.001) in phase 1 and 53.0% (p < 0.001) in phase 2. The WT of 16.9 min at baseline was reduced to 3.8 min in phase 1 (p < 0.001), and 3.6 min in phase 2 (p < 0.001). Moreover, the results showed that a WT < 10 min was consistent with a PCE ≥ 25%. Conclusions: Establishing an ITPS for phlebotomy can significantly increase PCE and shorten the WT. Furthermore, the PCE ≥ 25% could be a good assessment reference for the management of appropriate human resources for phlebotomy services, although it is a complex parameter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8431132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84311322021-09-11 Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services Wu, Ming-Feng Li, Jen-Ying Lin, Yu-Hsuan Huang, Wei-Chang He, Chi-Chih Wang, Jiunn-Min Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The waiting time (WT) for a phlebotomy is directly related to patient satisfaction with a health service. However, the processing time varies widely depending on the type of patients. Monitoring of the WT alone may not enable an effective evaluation of the lean performance of the medical staff for patients with different characteristics. The objective of this study was to use process cycle efficiency (PCE) to assess the performance of an intelligent tube preparation system (ITPS) which automatically labeled test tubes and conducted patient rerouting for phlebotomy services, and to interpret the WT during peak hours. Methods: Three time periods were used. The baseline period was from 1 July to 31 July 2014. Phase 1 was after the establishment of the ITPS, with patients ≥80 years old being rerouted. In phase 2, patients ≥78 years old were rerouted. Those data were recorded with a calling system and ITPS, respectively. Results: PCE was significantly improved from 12.9% at baseline to 51.1% (p < 0.001) in phase 1 and 53.0% (p < 0.001) in phase 2. The WT of 16.9 min at baseline was reduced to 3.8 min in phase 1 (p < 0.001), and 3.6 min in phase 2 (p < 0.001). Moreover, the results showed that a WT < 10 min was consistent with a PCE ≥ 25%. Conclusions: Establishing an ITPS for phlebotomy can significantly increase PCE and shorten the WT. Furthermore, the PCE ≥ 25% could be a good assessment reference for the management of appropriate human resources for phlebotomy services, although it is a complex parameter. MDPI 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8431132/ /pubmed/34501976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179386 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wu, Ming-Feng Li, Jen-Ying Lin, Yu-Hsuan Huang, Wei-Chang He, Chi-Chih Wang, Jiunn-Min Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services |
title | Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services |
title_full | Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services |
title_fullStr | Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services |
title_full_unstemmed | Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services |
title_short | Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services |
title_sort | processing cycle efficiency to monitor the performance of an intelligent tube preparation system for phlebotomy services |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8431132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179386 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wumingfeng processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices AT lijenying processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices AT linyuhsuan processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices AT huangweichang processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices AT hechichih processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices AT wangjiunnmin processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices |