Cargando…

Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services

Background: The waiting time (WT) for a phlebotomy is directly related to patient satisfaction with a health service. However, the processing time varies widely depending on the type of patients. Monitoring of the WT alone may not enable an effective evaluation of the lean performance of the medical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Ming-Feng, Li, Jen-Ying, Lin, Yu-Hsuan, Huang, Wei-Chang, He, Chi-Chih, Wang, Jiunn-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8431132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179386
_version_ 1783750865240195072
author Wu, Ming-Feng
Li, Jen-Ying
Lin, Yu-Hsuan
Huang, Wei-Chang
He, Chi-Chih
Wang, Jiunn-Min
author_facet Wu, Ming-Feng
Li, Jen-Ying
Lin, Yu-Hsuan
Huang, Wei-Chang
He, Chi-Chih
Wang, Jiunn-Min
author_sort Wu, Ming-Feng
collection PubMed
description Background: The waiting time (WT) for a phlebotomy is directly related to patient satisfaction with a health service. However, the processing time varies widely depending on the type of patients. Monitoring of the WT alone may not enable an effective evaluation of the lean performance of the medical staff for patients with different characteristics. The objective of this study was to use process cycle efficiency (PCE) to assess the performance of an intelligent tube preparation system (ITPS) which automatically labeled test tubes and conducted patient rerouting for phlebotomy services, and to interpret the WT during peak hours. Methods: Three time periods were used. The baseline period was from 1 July to 31 July 2014. Phase 1 was after the establishment of the ITPS, with patients ≥80 years old being rerouted. In phase 2, patients ≥78 years old were rerouted. Those data were recorded with a calling system and ITPS, respectively. Results: PCE was significantly improved from 12.9% at baseline to 51.1% (p < 0.001) in phase 1 and 53.0% (p < 0.001) in phase 2. The WT of 16.9 min at baseline was reduced to 3.8 min in phase 1 (p < 0.001), and 3.6 min in phase 2 (p < 0.001). Moreover, the results showed that a WT < 10 min was consistent with a PCE ≥ 25%. Conclusions: Establishing an ITPS for phlebotomy can significantly increase PCE and shorten the WT. Furthermore, the PCE ≥ 25% could be a good assessment reference for the management of appropriate human resources for phlebotomy services, although it is a complex parameter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8431132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84311322021-09-11 Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services Wu, Ming-Feng Li, Jen-Ying Lin, Yu-Hsuan Huang, Wei-Chang He, Chi-Chih Wang, Jiunn-Min Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The waiting time (WT) for a phlebotomy is directly related to patient satisfaction with a health service. However, the processing time varies widely depending on the type of patients. Monitoring of the WT alone may not enable an effective evaluation of the lean performance of the medical staff for patients with different characteristics. The objective of this study was to use process cycle efficiency (PCE) to assess the performance of an intelligent tube preparation system (ITPS) which automatically labeled test tubes and conducted patient rerouting for phlebotomy services, and to interpret the WT during peak hours. Methods: Three time periods were used. The baseline period was from 1 July to 31 July 2014. Phase 1 was after the establishment of the ITPS, with patients ≥80 years old being rerouted. In phase 2, patients ≥78 years old were rerouted. Those data were recorded with a calling system and ITPS, respectively. Results: PCE was significantly improved from 12.9% at baseline to 51.1% (p < 0.001) in phase 1 and 53.0% (p < 0.001) in phase 2. The WT of 16.9 min at baseline was reduced to 3.8 min in phase 1 (p < 0.001), and 3.6 min in phase 2 (p < 0.001). Moreover, the results showed that a WT < 10 min was consistent with a PCE ≥ 25%. Conclusions: Establishing an ITPS for phlebotomy can significantly increase PCE and shorten the WT. Furthermore, the PCE ≥ 25% could be a good assessment reference for the management of appropriate human resources for phlebotomy services, although it is a complex parameter. MDPI 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8431132/ /pubmed/34501976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179386 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wu, Ming-Feng
Li, Jen-Ying
Lin, Yu-Hsuan
Huang, Wei-Chang
He, Chi-Chih
Wang, Jiunn-Min
Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services
title Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services
title_full Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services
title_fullStr Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services
title_full_unstemmed Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services
title_short Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services
title_sort processing cycle efficiency to monitor the performance of an intelligent tube preparation system for phlebotomy services
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8431132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179386
work_keys_str_mv AT wumingfeng processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices
AT lijenying processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices
AT linyuhsuan processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices
AT huangweichang processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices
AT hechichih processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices
AT wangjiunnmin processingcycleefficiencytomonitortheperformanceofanintelligenttubepreparationsystemforphlebotomyservices