Cargando…
Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
The aim is to provide meta-analytical evidence on eHealth interventions’ efficacy in supporting the psychosocial and physical well-being of adults with type 1 or type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and to investigate differences in interventions primarily targeted at providing glycemic control vs. psycho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8431552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178982 |
_version_ | 1783750964358938624 |
---|---|
author | Bassi, Giulia Mancinelli, Elisa Dell’Arciprete, Gaia Rizzi, Silvia Gabrielli, Silvia Salcuni, Silvia |
author_facet | Bassi, Giulia Mancinelli, Elisa Dell’Arciprete, Gaia Rizzi, Silvia Gabrielli, Silvia Salcuni, Silvia |
author_sort | Bassi, Giulia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim is to provide meta-analytical evidence on eHealth interventions’ efficacy in supporting the psychosocial and physical well-being of adults with type 1 or type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and to investigate differences in interventions primarily targeted at providing glycemic control vs. psychosocial support. A PRISMA-guided systematic search was conducted. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) regarding eHealth interventions for adults (18–65 years) with DM were included. Data were pooled using Standard Mean Difference (SMD); sub-group analysis and meta-regressions were performed when appropriate. Outcomes were Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), diabetes distress, quality of life, anxiety, stress, and depression. Intervention acceptability was assessed performing the Odds Ratio (OR) of drop-out rates. Thirteen RCTs comprising 1315 participants were included (52.09% females; M(age) = 46.18, SD = 9.98). Analyses showed intervention efficacy on HbA1c (SMD = −0.40; 95% CI = −0.70, −0.12; k = 13) and depressive symptoms (SMD = −0.18; 95% CI = −0.33, −0.02; k = 6) at RCTs endpoint and were well accepted (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.72, 2.81; k = 10). However, efficacy on HbA1c was not maintained at follow-up (SMD = −0.13; 95% CI = −0.31, 0.05; k = 6). eHealth interventions providing medical support were acceptable and effective in fostering glycemic control and decreasing depressive symptoms in the short-term only. Digital solutions should be developed on multiple levels to fully support the psychophysical well-being of people with DM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8431552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84315522021-09-11 Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Bassi, Giulia Mancinelli, Elisa Dell’Arciprete, Gaia Rizzi, Silvia Gabrielli, Silvia Salcuni, Silvia Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review The aim is to provide meta-analytical evidence on eHealth interventions’ efficacy in supporting the psychosocial and physical well-being of adults with type 1 or type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and to investigate differences in interventions primarily targeted at providing glycemic control vs. psychosocial support. A PRISMA-guided systematic search was conducted. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) regarding eHealth interventions for adults (18–65 years) with DM were included. Data were pooled using Standard Mean Difference (SMD); sub-group analysis and meta-regressions were performed when appropriate. Outcomes were Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), diabetes distress, quality of life, anxiety, stress, and depression. Intervention acceptability was assessed performing the Odds Ratio (OR) of drop-out rates. Thirteen RCTs comprising 1315 participants were included (52.09% females; M(age) = 46.18, SD = 9.98). Analyses showed intervention efficacy on HbA1c (SMD = −0.40; 95% CI = −0.70, −0.12; k = 13) and depressive symptoms (SMD = −0.18; 95% CI = −0.33, −0.02; k = 6) at RCTs endpoint and were well accepted (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.72, 2.81; k = 10). However, efficacy on HbA1c was not maintained at follow-up (SMD = −0.13; 95% CI = −0.31, 0.05; k = 6). eHealth interventions providing medical support were acceptable and effective in fostering glycemic control and decreasing depressive symptoms in the short-term only. Digital solutions should be developed on multiple levels to fully support the psychophysical well-being of people with DM. MDPI 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8431552/ /pubmed/34501572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178982 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Bassi, Giulia Mancinelli, Elisa Dell’Arciprete, Gaia Rizzi, Silvia Gabrielli, Silvia Salcuni, Silvia Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of ehealth interventions for adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8431552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178982 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bassigiulia efficacyofehealthinterventionsforadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mancinellielisa efficacyofehealthinterventionsforadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dellarcipretegaia efficacyofehealthinterventionsforadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rizzisilvia efficacyofehealthinterventionsforadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gabriellisilvia efficacyofehealthinterventionsforadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT salcunisilvia efficacyofehealthinterventionsforadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |