Cargando…
Targeting S1PR1 May Result in Enhanced Migration of Cancer Cells in Bladder Carcinoma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Metastasis is critical to the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer, and it is important to understand the mechanism of its occurrence. S1PR1 expression is thought to be associated with poor prognosis, but it is unknown whether it is associated with tumor metastasis. Analysis of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8431630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34503284 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174474 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Metastasis is critical to the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer, and it is important to understand the mechanism of its occurrence. S1PR1 expression is thought to be associated with poor prognosis, but it is unknown whether it is associated with tumor metastasis. Analysis of clinical gene expression data suggests that endothelial or immune cells in tumor tissue may be the source of S1PR1 expression. Comparative analysis of clinical tumor tissues with bladder cancer cells suggests that S1PR1 expression is associated with cellular adhesion. In vitro experiments demonstrated that S1PR1 expression was negatively correlated with cancer cell motility, and that S1PR1 inhibition by FTY-720 may cause an increase in cancer cell motility, suggesting that the use of S1PR1 inhibition as a synergistic therapy requires additional observations and considerations. ABSTRACT: Clinical bladder tumor histological analysis shows that high expression of S1PR1 is associated with poor patient prognosis. However, there are no studies that describe the underlying mechanism. To investigate the relative distribution and actual function of S1PR1 in bladder tumors, we analyzed multiple clinical databases in combination with tumor purity and immune cell infiltration simulations, as well as databases of well-defined histological phenotypes of bladder cancer, and single-cell sequencing of adjacent normal tissues and bladder tumors, and further compared them with bladder cancer cell lines. The results showed that S1PR1 expression was generally higher in normal tissues than in bladder cancer tissues, and its distribution was mainly in endothelial cells or immune cells. The association between high S1PR1 expression and poor prognosis may be due to tumor invasion of adjacent normal tissues, where highly expressed S1PR1 may affect prognostic interpretation. The effect of S1PR1 itself on cancer cells was associated with cell adhesion, and in bladder cancer cells, S1PR1 expression was negatively correlated with cell motility. Moreover, the use of FTY-720 will cause an increased metastatic ability of bladder cancer cells. In conclusion, we suggest that the use of S1PR1-specific inhibition as a synergistic treatment requires more observation and consideration. |
---|