Cargando…

The Impact of Biomedical Engineering on the Development of Minimally Invasive Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

(1) We describe the boundary conditions for minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) with the aim to reduce procedure-related patient injury and discomfort. (2) The analysis of the MICS work process and its demand for improved tools and devices is followed by a description of the relevant sub-speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cocchieri, Riccardo, van de Wetering, Bertus, Stijnen, Marco, Riezebos, Robert, de Mol, Bastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173877
_version_ 1783751087971368960
author Cocchieri, Riccardo
van de Wetering, Bertus
Stijnen, Marco
Riezebos, Robert
de Mol, Bastian
author_facet Cocchieri, Riccardo
van de Wetering, Bertus
Stijnen, Marco
Riezebos, Robert
de Mol, Bastian
author_sort Cocchieri, Riccardo
collection PubMed
description (1) We describe the boundary conditions for minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) with the aim to reduce procedure-related patient injury and discomfort. (2) The analysis of the MICS work process and its demand for improved tools and devices is followed by a description of the relevant sub-specialties of bio-medical engineering: electronics, biomechanics, and materials sciences. (3) Innovations can represent a desired adaptation of an existing work process or a radical redesign of procedure and devices such as in transcutaneous procedures. Focused interaction between engineers, industry, and surgeons is always mandatory (i.e., a therapeutic alliance for addressing ‘unmet patient or professional needs’. (4) Novel techniques in MICS lean heavily on usability and safe and effective use in dedicated hands. Therefore, the use of training and simulation models should enable skills selection, a safe learning curve, and maintenance of proficiency. (5) The critical technical steps and cost–benefit trade-offs during the journey from invention to application will be explained. Business considerations such as time-to-market and returns on investment do shape the cost–benefit room for commercial use of technology. Proof of clinical safety and effectiveness by physicians remains important, but establishing the technical reliability of MICS tools and warranting appropriate surgical skills come first.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8432110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84321102021-09-11 The Impact of Biomedical Engineering on the Development of Minimally Invasive Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Cocchieri, Riccardo van de Wetering, Bertus Stijnen, Marco Riezebos, Robert de Mol, Bastian J Clin Med Review (1) We describe the boundary conditions for minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) with the aim to reduce procedure-related patient injury and discomfort. (2) The analysis of the MICS work process and its demand for improved tools and devices is followed by a description of the relevant sub-specialties of bio-medical engineering: electronics, biomechanics, and materials sciences. (3) Innovations can represent a desired adaptation of an existing work process or a radical redesign of procedure and devices such as in transcutaneous procedures. Focused interaction between engineers, industry, and surgeons is always mandatory (i.e., a therapeutic alliance for addressing ‘unmet patient or professional needs’. (4) Novel techniques in MICS lean heavily on usability and safe and effective use in dedicated hands. Therefore, the use of training and simulation models should enable skills selection, a safe learning curve, and maintenance of proficiency. (5) The critical technical steps and cost–benefit trade-offs during the journey from invention to application will be explained. Business considerations such as time-to-market and returns on investment do shape the cost–benefit room for commercial use of technology. Proof of clinical safety and effectiveness by physicians remains important, but establishing the technical reliability of MICS tools and warranting appropriate surgical skills come first. MDPI 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8432110/ /pubmed/34501325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173877 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cocchieri, Riccardo
van de Wetering, Bertus
Stijnen, Marco
Riezebos, Robert
de Mol, Bastian
The Impact of Biomedical Engineering on the Development of Minimally Invasive Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
title The Impact of Biomedical Engineering on the Development of Minimally Invasive Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
title_full The Impact of Biomedical Engineering on the Development of Minimally Invasive Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
title_fullStr The Impact of Biomedical Engineering on the Development of Minimally Invasive Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Biomedical Engineering on the Development of Minimally Invasive Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
title_short The Impact of Biomedical Engineering on the Development of Minimally Invasive Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
title_sort impact of biomedical engineering on the development of minimally invasive cardio-thoracic surgery
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173877
work_keys_str_mv AT cocchieririccardo theimpactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery
AT vandeweteringbertus theimpactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery
AT stijnenmarco theimpactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery
AT riezebosrobert theimpactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery
AT demolbastian theimpactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery
AT cocchieririccardo impactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery
AT vandeweteringbertus impactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery
AT stijnenmarco impactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery
AT riezebosrobert impactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery
AT demolbastian impactofbiomedicalengineeringonthedevelopmentofminimallyinvasivecardiothoracicsurgery