Cargando…
Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
Objective: The aim of the study was to perform a systematic assessment of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, and morbidity rates after open radical hysterectomy (ORH) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for early-stage cervical cancer and discuss with experts the consequences of the LAC...
Autores principales: | Röseler, Jona, Wolff, Robert, Bauerschlag, Dirk O., Maass, Nicolai, Hillemanns, Peter, Ferreira, Helder, Debrouwere, Marie, Scheibler, Fülöp, Geiger, Friedemann, Elessawy, Mohamed |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173761 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Jin, Yue-Mei, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Makowski, Marcin, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Cost–Utility Analysis of Open Radical Hysterectomy Compared to Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Michaan, Nadav, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study
por: Zhang, Nina, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The incidence of urologic complications requiring urologic procedure in radical hysterectomy and difference between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
por: Kim, Hyeongsu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)