Cargando…

Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective, cross‐sectional study evaluated the feasibility and potential benefits of incorporating deep‐learning on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into planning stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) implantation in pediatric patients with diagnostically complex drug‐re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagstyl, Konrad, Adler, Sophie, Pimpel, Birgit, Chari, Aswin, Seunarine, Kiran, Lorio, Sara, Thornton, Rachel, Baldeweg, Torsten, Tisdall, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32533794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16574
_version_ 1783751099691302912
author Wagstyl, Konrad
Adler, Sophie
Pimpel, Birgit
Chari, Aswin
Seunarine, Kiran
Lorio, Sara
Thornton, Rachel
Baldeweg, Torsten
Tisdall, Martin
author_facet Wagstyl, Konrad
Adler, Sophie
Pimpel, Birgit
Chari, Aswin
Seunarine, Kiran
Lorio, Sara
Thornton, Rachel
Baldeweg, Torsten
Tisdall, Martin
author_sort Wagstyl, Konrad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This retrospective, cross‐sectional study evaluated the feasibility and potential benefits of incorporating deep‐learning on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into planning stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) implantation in pediatric patients with diagnostically complex drug‐resistant epilepsy. This study aimed to assess the degree of colocalization between automated lesion detection and the seizure onset zone (SOZ) as assessed by sEEG. METHODS: A neural network classifier was applied to cortical features from MRI data from three cohorts. (1) The network was trained and cross‐validated using 34 patients with visible focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs). (2) Specificity was assessed in 20 pediatric healthy controls. (3) Feasibility of incorporation into sEEG implantation plans was evaluated in 34 sEEG patients. Coordinates of sEEG contacts were coregistered with classifier‐predicted lesions. sEEG contacts in seizure onset and irritative tissue were identified by clinical neurophysiologists. A distance of <10 mm between SOZ contacts and classifier‐predicted lesions was considered colocalization. RESULTS: In patients with radiologically defined lesions, classifier sensitivity was 74% (25/34 lesions detected). No clusters were detected in the controls (specificity = 100%). Of the total 34 sEEG patients, 21 patients had a focal cortical SOZ, of whom eight were histopathologically confirmed as having an FCD. The algorithm correctly detected seven of eight of these FCDs (86%). In patients with histopathologically heterogeneous focal cortical lesions, there was colocalization between classifier output and SOZ contacts in 62%. In three patients, the electroclinical profile was indicative of focal epilepsy, but no SOZ was localized on sEEG. In these patients, the classifier identified additional abnormalities that had not been implanted. SIGNIFICANCE: There was a high degree of colocalization between automated lesion detection and sEEG. We have created a framework for incorporation of deep‐learning–based MRI lesion detection into sEEG implantation planning. Our findings support the prospective evaluation of automated MRI analysis to plan optimal electrode trajectories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8432161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84321612021-09-14 Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study Wagstyl, Konrad Adler, Sophie Pimpel, Birgit Chari, Aswin Seunarine, Kiran Lorio, Sara Thornton, Rachel Baldeweg, Torsten Tisdall, Martin Epilepsia Full Length Original Research Paper OBJECTIVE: This retrospective, cross‐sectional study evaluated the feasibility and potential benefits of incorporating deep‐learning on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into planning stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) implantation in pediatric patients with diagnostically complex drug‐resistant epilepsy. This study aimed to assess the degree of colocalization between automated lesion detection and the seizure onset zone (SOZ) as assessed by sEEG. METHODS: A neural network classifier was applied to cortical features from MRI data from three cohorts. (1) The network was trained and cross‐validated using 34 patients with visible focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs). (2) Specificity was assessed in 20 pediatric healthy controls. (3) Feasibility of incorporation into sEEG implantation plans was evaluated in 34 sEEG patients. Coordinates of sEEG contacts were coregistered with classifier‐predicted lesions. sEEG contacts in seizure onset and irritative tissue were identified by clinical neurophysiologists. A distance of <10 mm between SOZ contacts and classifier‐predicted lesions was considered colocalization. RESULTS: In patients with radiologically defined lesions, classifier sensitivity was 74% (25/34 lesions detected). No clusters were detected in the controls (specificity = 100%). Of the total 34 sEEG patients, 21 patients had a focal cortical SOZ, of whom eight were histopathologically confirmed as having an FCD. The algorithm correctly detected seven of eight of these FCDs (86%). In patients with histopathologically heterogeneous focal cortical lesions, there was colocalization between classifier output and SOZ contacts in 62%. In three patients, the electroclinical profile was indicative of focal epilepsy, but no SOZ was localized on sEEG. In these patients, the classifier identified additional abnormalities that had not been implanted. SIGNIFICANCE: There was a high degree of colocalization between automated lesion detection and sEEG. We have created a framework for incorporation of deep‐learning–based MRI lesion detection into sEEG implantation planning. Our findings support the prospective evaluation of automated MRI analysis to plan optimal electrode trajectories. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-13 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8432161/ /pubmed/32533794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16574 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Length Original Research Paper
Wagstyl, Konrad
Adler, Sophie
Pimpel, Birgit
Chari, Aswin
Seunarine, Kiran
Lorio, Sara
Thornton, Rachel
Baldeweg, Torsten
Tisdall, Martin
Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study
title Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study
title_full Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study
title_fullStr Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study
title_short Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study
title_sort planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: retrospective feasibility study
topic Full Length Original Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32533794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16574
work_keys_str_mv AT wagstylkonrad planningstereoelectroencephalographyusingautomatedlesiondetectionretrospectivefeasibilitystudy
AT adlersophie planningstereoelectroencephalographyusingautomatedlesiondetectionretrospectivefeasibilitystudy
AT pimpelbirgit planningstereoelectroencephalographyusingautomatedlesiondetectionretrospectivefeasibilitystudy
AT chariaswin planningstereoelectroencephalographyusingautomatedlesiondetectionretrospectivefeasibilitystudy
AT seunarinekiran planningstereoelectroencephalographyusingautomatedlesiondetectionretrospectivefeasibilitystudy
AT loriosara planningstereoelectroencephalographyusingautomatedlesiondetectionretrospectivefeasibilitystudy
AT thorntonrachel planningstereoelectroencephalographyusingautomatedlesiondetectionretrospectivefeasibilitystudy
AT baldewegtorsten planningstereoelectroencephalographyusingautomatedlesiondetectionretrospectivefeasibilitystudy
AT tisdallmartin planningstereoelectroencephalographyusingautomatedlesiondetectionretrospectivefeasibilitystudy