Cargando…
Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus
Electrical stimulation with cochlear implants is able to significantly suppress the tinnitus sensations in 25–72% of implanted patients. Up to this point, no clear predictors for the effectiveness of tinnitus suppression with cochlear implants have been found and this substantially limits the possib...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173793 |
_version_ | 1783751101095346176 |
---|---|
author | Poels, Laure Zarowski, Andrzej Leblans, Marc Vanspauwen, Robby van Dinther, Joost Offeciers, Erwin |
author_facet | Poels, Laure Zarowski, Andrzej Leblans, Marc Vanspauwen, Robby van Dinther, Joost Offeciers, Erwin |
author_sort | Poels, Laure |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electrical stimulation with cochlear implants is able to significantly suppress the tinnitus sensations in 25–72% of implanted patients. Up to this point, no clear predictors for the effectiveness of tinnitus suppression with cochlear implants have been found and this substantially limits the possibility of the application of cochlear implants for this purpose. The objective of the study was to investigate if a trial electrical round window stimulation (RWS) could be used as a diagnostic tool for identifying candidates in whom electrical stimulation would be successful as treatment for tinnitus. Thirty-four patients with unilateral severe tinnitus and ipsilateral moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss underwent a trial RWS under local anesthesia. Thirteen patients received a cochlear implant. All patients qualified for cochlear implantation on the basis of the trial RWS showed tinnitus suppression with the implant switched on. Complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression was obtained in 77% and partial in 23%. The mean tinnitus loudness reduction was 68% (VAS score reduction from 7.7 to 2.5). False negative results are estimated not to exceed 10–15%. We conclude that significant tinnitus suppression achieved during trial RWS under local anesthesia is a simple procedure allowing the efficient identification of candidates in whom electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant would be successful as treatment for intractable tinnitus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8432167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84321672021-09-11 Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus Poels, Laure Zarowski, Andrzej Leblans, Marc Vanspauwen, Robby van Dinther, Joost Offeciers, Erwin J Clin Med Article Electrical stimulation with cochlear implants is able to significantly suppress the tinnitus sensations in 25–72% of implanted patients. Up to this point, no clear predictors for the effectiveness of tinnitus suppression with cochlear implants have been found and this substantially limits the possibility of the application of cochlear implants for this purpose. The objective of the study was to investigate if a trial electrical round window stimulation (RWS) could be used as a diagnostic tool for identifying candidates in whom electrical stimulation would be successful as treatment for tinnitus. Thirty-four patients with unilateral severe tinnitus and ipsilateral moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss underwent a trial RWS under local anesthesia. Thirteen patients received a cochlear implant. All patients qualified for cochlear implantation on the basis of the trial RWS showed tinnitus suppression with the implant switched on. Complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression was obtained in 77% and partial in 23%. The mean tinnitus loudness reduction was 68% (VAS score reduction from 7.7 to 2.5). False negative results are estimated not to exceed 10–15%. We conclude that significant tinnitus suppression achieved during trial RWS under local anesthesia is a simple procedure allowing the efficient identification of candidates in whom electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant would be successful as treatment for intractable tinnitus. MDPI 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8432167/ /pubmed/34501241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173793 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Poels, Laure Zarowski, Andrzej Leblans, Marc Vanspauwen, Robby van Dinther, Joost Offeciers, Erwin Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus |
title | Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus |
title_full | Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus |
title_short | Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus |
title_sort | prognostic value of trial round window stimulation for selection of candidates for cochlear implantation as treatment for tinnitus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173793 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poelslaure prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus AT zarowskiandrzej prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus AT leblansmarc prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus AT vanspauwenrobby prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus AT vandintherjoost prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus AT offecierserwin prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus |