Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus

Electrical stimulation with cochlear implants is able to significantly suppress the tinnitus sensations in 25–72% of implanted patients. Up to this point, no clear predictors for the effectiveness of tinnitus suppression with cochlear implants have been found and this substantially limits the possib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poels, Laure, Zarowski, Andrzej, Leblans, Marc, Vanspauwen, Robby, van Dinther, Joost, Offeciers, Erwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173793
_version_ 1783751101095346176
author Poels, Laure
Zarowski, Andrzej
Leblans, Marc
Vanspauwen, Robby
van Dinther, Joost
Offeciers, Erwin
author_facet Poels, Laure
Zarowski, Andrzej
Leblans, Marc
Vanspauwen, Robby
van Dinther, Joost
Offeciers, Erwin
author_sort Poels, Laure
collection PubMed
description Electrical stimulation with cochlear implants is able to significantly suppress the tinnitus sensations in 25–72% of implanted patients. Up to this point, no clear predictors for the effectiveness of tinnitus suppression with cochlear implants have been found and this substantially limits the possibility of the application of cochlear implants for this purpose. The objective of the study was to investigate if a trial electrical round window stimulation (RWS) could be used as a diagnostic tool for identifying candidates in whom electrical stimulation would be successful as treatment for tinnitus. Thirty-four patients with unilateral severe tinnitus and ipsilateral moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss underwent a trial RWS under local anesthesia. Thirteen patients received a cochlear implant. All patients qualified for cochlear implantation on the basis of the trial RWS showed tinnitus suppression with the implant switched on. Complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression was obtained in 77% and partial in 23%. The mean tinnitus loudness reduction was 68% (VAS score reduction from 7.7 to 2.5). False negative results are estimated not to exceed 10–15%. We conclude that significant tinnitus suppression achieved during trial RWS under local anesthesia is a simple procedure allowing the efficient identification of candidates in whom electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant would be successful as treatment for intractable tinnitus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8432167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84321672021-09-11 Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus Poels, Laure Zarowski, Andrzej Leblans, Marc Vanspauwen, Robby van Dinther, Joost Offeciers, Erwin J Clin Med Article Electrical stimulation with cochlear implants is able to significantly suppress the tinnitus sensations in 25–72% of implanted patients. Up to this point, no clear predictors for the effectiveness of tinnitus suppression with cochlear implants have been found and this substantially limits the possibility of the application of cochlear implants for this purpose. The objective of the study was to investigate if a trial electrical round window stimulation (RWS) could be used as a diagnostic tool for identifying candidates in whom electrical stimulation would be successful as treatment for tinnitus. Thirty-four patients with unilateral severe tinnitus and ipsilateral moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss underwent a trial RWS under local anesthesia. Thirteen patients received a cochlear implant. All patients qualified for cochlear implantation on the basis of the trial RWS showed tinnitus suppression with the implant switched on. Complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression was obtained in 77% and partial in 23%. The mean tinnitus loudness reduction was 68% (VAS score reduction from 7.7 to 2.5). False negative results are estimated not to exceed 10–15%. We conclude that significant tinnitus suppression achieved during trial RWS under local anesthesia is a simple procedure allowing the efficient identification of candidates in whom electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant would be successful as treatment for intractable tinnitus. MDPI 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8432167/ /pubmed/34501241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173793 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Poels, Laure
Zarowski, Andrzej
Leblans, Marc
Vanspauwen, Robby
van Dinther, Joost
Offeciers, Erwin
Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus
title Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus
title_full Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus
title_short Prognostic Value of Trial Round Window Stimulation for Selection of Candidates for Cochlear Implantation as Treatment for Tinnitus
title_sort prognostic value of trial round window stimulation for selection of candidates for cochlear implantation as treatment for tinnitus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173793
work_keys_str_mv AT poelslaure prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus
AT zarowskiandrzej prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus
AT leblansmarc prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus
AT vanspauwenrobby prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus
AT vandintherjoost prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus
AT offecierserwin prognosticvalueoftrialroundwindowstimulationforselectionofcandidatesforcochlearimplantationastreatmentfortinnitus