Cargando…

Role of Rapid Antigen Testing in Population-Based SARS-CoV-2 Screening

This study evaluates a population-based screening of asymptomatic people, using a rapid antigen diagnostic test (RADT), in areas of high transmission. To detect sources of SARS-CoV-2 infection, nasopharyngeal samples were taken and were tested using RADT. Confirmatory RT-qPCR tests were performed in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martín-Sánchez, Vicente, Fernández-Villa, Tania, Carvajal Urueña, Ana, Rivero Rodríguez, Ana, Reguero Celada, Sofía, Sánchez Antolín, Gloria, Fernández-Vázquez, José Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173854
_version_ 1783751105790869504
author Martín-Sánchez, Vicente
Fernández-Villa, Tania
Carvajal Urueña, Ana
Rivero Rodríguez, Ana
Reguero Celada, Sofía
Sánchez Antolín, Gloria
Fernández-Vázquez, José Pedro
author_facet Martín-Sánchez, Vicente
Fernández-Villa, Tania
Carvajal Urueña, Ana
Rivero Rodríguez, Ana
Reguero Celada, Sofía
Sánchez Antolín, Gloria
Fernández-Vázquez, José Pedro
author_sort Martín-Sánchez, Vicente
collection PubMed
description This study evaluates a population-based screening of asymptomatic people, using a rapid antigen diagnostic test (RADT), in areas of high transmission. To detect sources of SARS-CoV-2 infection, nasopharyngeal samples were taken and were tested using RADT. Confirmatory RT-qPCR tests were performed in both positive and negative cases. The internal validity of the RADT, the prevalence of infection, and the positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were estimated, based on the percentages of confirmed cases with 95% confidence interval. Of the 157,920 people registered, 50,492 participated in the screening; 50,052 were negative, and 440 were positive on the RADT (0.87%). A total of 221 positive RADT samples were reanalysed using RT-qPCR and 214 were confirmed as positive (96.8%; 95% CI: 93.5–98.7%), while 657 out of 660 negative RADT samples were confirmed as RT-qPCR negative (99.5%; 95% CI 98.7–99.9%). The sensitivity obtained was 65.1% (38.4–90.2%) and the specificity was 99.97% (99.94–99.99%). The prevalence of infection was 1.30% (0.95–2.13%). The PPVs were 95.4% (85.9–98.9%) and 97.9% (93.3–99.5%), respectively, while the NPVs were 99.7% (99.4–100%) and 99.2% (98.7–100%), respectively. The high specificity found allow us to report a high screening performance in asymptomatic patients, even in areas where the prevalence of infection was less than 2%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8432187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84321872021-09-11 Role of Rapid Antigen Testing in Population-Based SARS-CoV-2 Screening Martín-Sánchez, Vicente Fernández-Villa, Tania Carvajal Urueña, Ana Rivero Rodríguez, Ana Reguero Celada, Sofía Sánchez Antolín, Gloria Fernández-Vázquez, José Pedro J Clin Med Article This study evaluates a population-based screening of asymptomatic people, using a rapid antigen diagnostic test (RADT), in areas of high transmission. To detect sources of SARS-CoV-2 infection, nasopharyngeal samples were taken and were tested using RADT. Confirmatory RT-qPCR tests were performed in both positive and negative cases. The internal validity of the RADT, the prevalence of infection, and the positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were estimated, based on the percentages of confirmed cases with 95% confidence interval. Of the 157,920 people registered, 50,492 participated in the screening; 50,052 were negative, and 440 were positive on the RADT (0.87%). A total of 221 positive RADT samples were reanalysed using RT-qPCR and 214 were confirmed as positive (96.8%; 95% CI: 93.5–98.7%), while 657 out of 660 negative RADT samples were confirmed as RT-qPCR negative (99.5%; 95% CI 98.7–99.9%). The sensitivity obtained was 65.1% (38.4–90.2%) and the specificity was 99.97% (99.94–99.99%). The prevalence of infection was 1.30% (0.95–2.13%). The PPVs were 95.4% (85.9–98.9%) and 97.9% (93.3–99.5%), respectively, while the NPVs were 99.7% (99.4–100%) and 99.2% (98.7–100%), respectively. The high specificity found allow us to report a high screening performance in asymptomatic patients, even in areas where the prevalence of infection was less than 2%. MDPI 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8432187/ /pubmed/34501297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173854 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Martín-Sánchez, Vicente
Fernández-Villa, Tania
Carvajal Urueña, Ana
Rivero Rodríguez, Ana
Reguero Celada, Sofía
Sánchez Antolín, Gloria
Fernández-Vázquez, José Pedro
Role of Rapid Antigen Testing in Population-Based SARS-CoV-2 Screening
title Role of Rapid Antigen Testing in Population-Based SARS-CoV-2 Screening
title_full Role of Rapid Antigen Testing in Population-Based SARS-CoV-2 Screening
title_fullStr Role of Rapid Antigen Testing in Population-Based SARS-CoV-2 Screening
title_full_unstemmed Role of Rapid Antigen Testing in Population-Based SARS-CoV-2 Screening
title_short Role of Rapid Antigen Testing in Population-Based SARS-CoV-2 Screening
title_sort role of rapid antigen testing in population-based sars-cov-2 screening
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173854
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsanchezvicente roleofrapidantigentestinginpopulationbasedsarscov2screening
AT fernandezvillatania roleofrapidantigentestinginpopulationbasedsarscov2screening
AT carvajaluruenaana roleofrapidantigentestinginpopulationbasedsarscov2screening
AT riverorodriguezana roleofrapidantigentestinginpopulationbasedsarscov2screening
AT regueroceladasofia roleofrapidantigentestinginpopulationbasedsarscov2screening
AT sanchezantolingloria roleofrapidantigentestinginpopulationbasedsarscov2screening
AT fernandezvazquezjosepedro roleofrapidantigentestinginpopulationbasedsarscov2screening