Cargando…
Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK
Previous studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy using 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zones in the WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System but have not evaluated if differing optical zone sizes influence refractive outcomes. This study examines visual outcomes between two study populations undergoing LAS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173776 |
_version_ | 1783751109620269056 |
---|---|
author | Moshirfar, Majid Huynh, Rachel Bundogji, Nour Tukan, Alyson N. Sant, Thomas M. McCabe, Shannon E. West, William B. Drennan, Kirk Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. |
author_facet | Moshirfar, Majid Huynh, Rachel Bundogji, Nour Tukan, Alyson N. Sant, Thomas M. McCabe, Shannon E. West, William B. Drennan, Kirk Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. |
author_sort | Moshirfar, Majid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy using 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zones in the WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System but have not evaluated if differing optical zone sizes influence refractive outcomes. This study examines visual outcomes between two study populations undergoing LASIK with either a 6.0 mm (1332 patients) or 6.5 mm (1332 patients) optical zone. Outcomes were further stratified by severity of myopia (low, moderate, and high) and astigmatism (low and high). Patients were matched by age and preoperative manifest sphere and cylinder. Postoperative measurements were then compared. The 6.5 mm group demonstrated better postoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), manifest sphere, and absolute value of the difference in actual and target spherical equivalent refraction (|∆ SEQ|), within the total population, moderate myopia, and low astigmatism groups, but this did not lead to improved postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) or best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Though astigmatic correction and postoperative angle of error were similar between optical zone sizes, they were significantly worse with high myopia. Overall, this study demonstrates differences in visual outcomes between the 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zone sizes that may warrant consideration; however, essentially, the results are comparable between them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8432203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84322032021-09-11 Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK Moshirfar, Majid Huynh, Rachel Bundogji, Nour Tukan, Alyson N. Sant, Thomas M. McCabe, Shannon E. West, William B. Drennan, Kirk Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. J Clin Med Article Previous studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy using 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zones in the WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System but have not evaluated if differing optical zone sizes influence refractive outcomes. This study examines visual outcomes between two study populations undergoing LASIK with either a 6.0 mm (1332 patients) or 6.5 mm (1332 patients) optical zone. Outcomes were further stratified by severity of myopia (low, moderate, and high) and astigmatism (low and high). Patients were matched by age and preoperative manifest sphere and cylinder. Postoperative measurements were then compared. The 6.5 mm group demonstrated better postoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), manifest sphere, and absolute value of the difference in actual and target spherical equivalent refraction (|∆ SEQ|), within the total population, moderate myopia, and low astigmatism groups, but this did not lead to improved postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) or best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Though astigmatic correction and postoperative angle of error were similar between optical zone sizes, they were significantly worse with high myopia. Overall, this study demonstrates differences in visual outcomes between the 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zone sizes that may warrant consideration; however, essentially, the results are comparable between them. MDPI 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8432203/ /pubmed/34501222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173776 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Moshirfar, Majid Huynh, Rachel Bundogji, Nour Tukan, Alyson N. Sant, Thomas M. McCabe, Shannon E. West, William B. Drennan, Kirk Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK |
title | Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK |
title_full | Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK |
title_short | Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK |
title_sort | comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm optical zone on visual outcomes after lasik |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moshirfarmajid comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik AT huynhrachel comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik AT bundogjinour comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik AT tukanalysonn comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik AT santthomasm comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik AT mccabeshannone comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik AT westwilliamb comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik AT drennankirk comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik AT ronquilloyasmynec comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik AT hoopesphillipc comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik |