Cargando…

Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK

Previous studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy using 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zones in the WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System but have not evaluated if differing optical zone sizes influence refractive outcomes. This study examines visual outcomes between two study populations undergoing LAS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moshirfar, Majid, Huynh, Rachel, Bundogji, Nour, Tukan, Alyson N., Sant, Thomas M., McCabe, Shannon E., West, William B., Drennan, Kirk, Ronquillo, Yasmyne C., Hoopes, Phillip C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173776
_version_ 1783751109620269056
author Moshirfar, Majid
Huynh, Rachel
Bundogji, Nour
Tukan, Alyson N.
Sant, Thomas M.
McCabe, Shannon E.
West, William B.
Drennan, Kirk
Ronquillo, Yasmyne C.
Hoopes, Phillip C.
author_facet Moshirfar, Majid
Huynh, Rachel
Bundogji, Nour
Tukan, Alyson N.
Sant, Thomas M.
McCabe, Shannon E.
West, William B.
Drennan, Kirk
Ronquillo, Yasmyne C.
Hoopes, Phillip C.
author_sort Moshirfar, Majid
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy using 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zones in the WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System but have not evaluated if differing optical zone sizes influence refractive outcomes. This study examines visual outcomes between two study populations undergoing LASIK with either a 6.0 mm (1332 patients) or 6.5 mm (1332 patients) optical zone. Outcomes were further stratified by severity of myopia (low, moderate, and high) and astigmatism (low and high). Patients were matched by age and preoperative manifest sphere and cylinder. Postoperative measurements were then compared. The 6.5 mm group demonstrated better postoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), manifest sphere, and absolute value of the difference in actual and target spherical equivalent refraction (|∆ SEQ|), within the total population, moderate myopia, and low astigmatism groups, but this did not lead to improved postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) or best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Though astigmatic correction and postoperative angle of error were similar between optical zone sizes, they were significantly worse with high myopia. Overall, this study demonstrates differences in visual outcomes between the 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zone sizes that may warrant consideration; however, essentially, the results are comparable between them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8432203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84322032021-09-11 Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK Moshirfar, Majid Huynh, Rachel Bundogji, Nour Tukan, Alyson N. Sant, Thomas M. McCabe, Shannon E. West, William B. Drennan, Kirk Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. J Clin Med Article Previous studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy using 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zones in the WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System but have not evaluated if differing optical zone sizes influence refractive outcomes. This study examines visual outcomes between two study populations undergoing LASIK with either a 6.0 mm (1332 patients) or 6.5 mm (1332 patients) optical zone. Outcomes were further stratified by severity of myopia (low, moderate, and high) and astigmatism (low and high). Patients were matched by age and preoperative manifest sphere and cylinder. Postoperative measurements were then compared. The 6.5 mm group demonstrated better postoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), manifest sphere, and absolute value of the difference in actual and target spherical equivalent refraction (|∆ SEQ|), within the total population, moderate myopia, and low astigmatism groups, but this did not lead to improved postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) or best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Though astigmatic correction and postoperative angle of error were similar between optical zone sizes, they were significantly worse with high myopia. Overall, this study demonstrates differences in visual outcomes between the 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zone sizes that may warrant consideration; however, essentially, the results are comparable between them. MDPI 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8432203/ /pubmed/34501222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173776 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moshirfar, Majid
Huynh, Rachel
Bundogji, Nour
Tukan, Alyson N.
Sant, Thomas M.
McCabe, Shannon E.
West, William B.
Drennan, Kirk
Ronquillo, Yasmyne C.
Hoopes, Phillip C.
Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK
title Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK
title_full Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK
title_fullStr Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK
title_short Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK
title_sort comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm optical zone on visual outcomes after lasik
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173776
work_keys_str_mv AT moshirfarmajid comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik
AT huynhrachel comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik
AT bundogjinour comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik
AT tukanalysonn comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik
AT santthomasm comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik
AT mccabeshannone comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik
AT westwilliamb comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik
AT drennankirk comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik
AT ronquilloyasmynec comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik
AT hoopesphillipc comparisonof60mmversus65mmopticalzoneonvisualoutcomesafterlasik