Cargando…

Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips

We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic myomectomy (SIRM) and multiport robotic myomectomy (MPRM) and provide surgical tips. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 462 patients with symptomatic leiomyoma who underwent MPRM or SIRM between March 2019 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sa-Ra, Kim, Ju-Hee, Lee, Young-Jae, Lee, Shin-Wha, Park, Jeong-Yeol, Suh, Dae-Shik, Kim, Dae-Yeon, Kim, Sung-Hoon, Kim, Yong-Man, Kim, Young-Tak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173957
_version_ 1783751111755169792
author Lee, Sa-Ra
Kim, Ju-Hee
Lee, Young-Jae
Lee, Shin-Wha
Park, Jeong-Yeol
Suh, Dae-Shik
Kim, Dae-Yeon
Kim, Sung-Hoon
Kim, Yong-Man
Kim, Young-Tak
author_facet Lee, Sa-Ra
Kim, Ju-Hee
Lee, Young-Jae
Lee, Shin-Wha
Park, Jeong-Yeol
Suh, Dae-Shik
Kim, Dae-Yeon
Kim, Sung-Hoon
Kim, Yong-Man
Kim, Young-Tak
author_sort Lee, Sa-Ra
collection PubMed
description We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic myomectomy (SIRM) and multiport robotic myomectomy (MPRM) and provide surgical tips. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 462 patients with symptomatic leiomyoma who underwent MPRM or SIRM between March 2019 and April 2021. Demographic characteristics and surgical outcomes, including the total operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical complication rate, were compared between the two groups. Patients in the SIRM group had lower a body mass index and rate of previous pelvic surgery and were younger than those in the MPRM group. The myoma type was not different between groups; however, the MPRM group had larger, and more myomas than the SIRM group. After propensity score matching, these variables were not significantly different between the groups. The total OT, EBL, difference in hemoglobin levels, transfusion rate, and postoperative fever were not different between the groups. No postoperative complications occurred in the SIRM group. In the MPRM group, one patient needed conversion to laparotomy, and two patients had postoperative complications (umbilical incisional hernia and acute kidney injury). In conclusion, both MPRM and SIRM are feasible and effective surgical options for symptomatic myomas with cosmetic benefits and minimal risk of laparotomy conversion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8432212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84322122021-09-11 Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips Lee, Sa-Ra Kim, Ju-Hee Lee, Young-Jae Lee, Shin-Wha Park, Jeong-Yeol Suh, Dae-Shik Kim, Dae-Yeon Kim, Sung-Hoon Kim, Yong-Man Kim, Young-Tak J Clin Med Article We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic myomectomy (SIRM) and multiport robotic myomectomy (MPRM) and provide surgical tips. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 462 patients with symptomatic leiomyoma who underwent MPRM or SIRM between March 2019 and April 2021. Demographic characteristics and surgical outcomes, including the total operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical complication rate, were compared between the two groups. Patients in the SIRM group had lower a body mass index and rate of previous pelvic surgery and were younger than those in the MPRM group. The myoma type was not different between groups; however, the MPRM group had larger, and more myomas than the SIRM group. After propensity score matching, these variables were not significantly different between the groups. The total OT, EBL, difference in hemoglobin levels, transfusion rate, and postoperative fever were not different between the groups. No postoperative complications occurred in the SIRM group. In the MPRM group, one patient needed conversion to laparotomy, and two patients had postoperative complications (umbilical incisional hernia and acute kidney injury). In conclusion, both MPRM and SIRM are feasible and effective surgical options for symptomatic myomas with cosmetic benefits and minimal risk of laparotomy conversion. MDPI 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8432212/ /pubmed/34501409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173957 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Sa-Ra
Kim, Ju-Hee
Lee, Young-Jae
Lee, Shin-Wha
Park, Jeong-Yeol
Suh, Dae-Shik
Kim, Dae-Yeon
Kim, Sung-Hoon
Kim, Yong-Man
Kim, Young-Tak
Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips
title Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips
title_full Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips
title_fullStr Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips
title_full_unstemmed Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips
title_short Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips
title_sort single-incision versus multiport robotic myomectomy: a propensity score matched analysis of surgical outcomes and surgical tips
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173957
work_keys_str_mv AT leesara singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips
AT kimjuhee singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips
AT leeyoungjae singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips
AT leeshinwha singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips
AT parkjeongyeol singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips
AT suhdaeshik singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips
AT kimdaeyeon singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips
AT kimsunghoon singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips
AT kimyongman singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips
AT kimyoungtak singleincisionversusmultiportroboticmyomectomyapropensityscorematchedanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesandsurgicaltips