Cargando…

Practicality and Reliability of Self vs Administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment Mobile App

OBJECTIVES: To develop and cross-validate self-administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment (SA-RGA) app against administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment (A-RGA) to identify seniors with geriatric syndromes such as frailty, sarcopenia, and anorexia of ageing who may benefit from targeted intervention. DES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, L. F., Chan, Y. H., Tay, A., Jayasundram, J., Low, N. A., Merchant, Reshma A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1672-9
_version_ 1783751127074865152
author Tan, L. F.
Chan, Y. H.
Tay, A.
Jayasundram, J.
Low, N. A.
Merchant, Reshma A.
author_facet Tan, L. F.
Chan, Y. H.
Tay, A.
Jayasundram, J.
Low, N. A.
Merchant, Reshma A.
author_sort Tan, L. F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop and cross-validate self-administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment (SA-RGA) app against administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment (A-RGA) to identify seniors with geriatric syndromes such as frailty, sarcopenia, and anorexia of ageing who may benefit from targeted intervention. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Primary Care and Community. PARTICIPANTS: A-RGA and SA-RGA app were administered to older adults ≥ 60 years old from December 2020 to April 2021. MEASUREMENTS: The RGA app screens for frailty (FRAIL), sarcopenia (SARC-F), anorexia of aging (SNAQ) and cognition (Rapid Cognitive Screen) with assisted management pathway. Patient Health Questionnaire 9 is administered for those who score positive for fatigue. The diagnostic performance of SA-RGA was compared against A-RGA as a reference by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and positive likelihood ratio (+LR). RESULTS: 123 participants with a mean age of 71 ± 5.9 years completed both the SA-RGA and A-RGA. Questions on fatigue, 5 or more illnesses, loss of weight and falls in the past year performed better with high sensitivity, specificity, NPV and +LR than self-functional assessment where SA-RGA participants reported lower prevalence on the FRAIL scale aerobic and resistance components, and higher prevalence on the SARC-F strength and rising from a chair components. CONCLUSION: The SA-RGA app performed well in certain domains such as assessment for weight loss, falls, number of chronic illness and fatigue. Self-functional assessment can be improved further by removing ambiguity in wordings such as “some” or “a lot” and replacing it with functional difficulty scale. SA-RGA has the potential to be incorporated in the eHEALTH platforms worldwide for early identifications of older adults at risk and to reduce health inequalities, at the same time building community resilience in the era of Covid-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8432277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84322772021-09-10 Practicality and Reliability of Self vs Administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment Mobile App Tan, L. F. Chan, Y. H. Tay, A. Jayasundram, J. Low, N. A. Merchant, Reshma A. J Nutr Health Aging Brief Reports OBJECTIVES: To develop and cross-validate self-administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment (SA-RGA) app against administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment (A-RGA) to identify seniors with geriatric syndromes such as frailty, sarcopenia, and anorexia of ageing who may benefit from targeted intervention. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Primary Care and Community. PARTICIPANTS: A-RGA and SA-RGA app were administered to older adults ≥ 60 years old from December 2020 to April 2021. MEASUREMENTS: The RGA app screens for frailty (FRAIL), sarcopenia (SARC-F), anorexia of aging (SNAQ) and cognition (Rapid Cognitive Screen) with assisted management pathway. Patient Health Questionnaire 9 is administered for those who score positive for fatigue. The diagnostic performance of SA-RGA was compared against A-RGA as a reference by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and positive likelihood ratio (+LR). RESULTS: 123 participants with a mean age of 71 ± 5.9 years completed both the SA-RGA and A-RGA. Questions on fatigue, 5 or more illnesses, loss of weight and falls in the past year performed better with high sensitivity, specificity, NPV and +LR than self-functional assessment where SA-RGA participants reported lower prevalence on the FRAIL scale aerobic and resistance components, and higher prevalence on the SARC-F strength and rising from a chair components. CONCLUSION: The SA-RGA app performed well in certain domains such as assessment for weight loss, falls, number of chronic illness and fatigue. Self-functional assessment can be improved further by removing ambiguity in wordings such as “some” or “a lot” and replacing it with functional difficulty scale. SA-RGA has the potential to be incorporated in the eHEALTH platforms worldwide for early identifications of older adults at risk and to reduce health inequalities, at the same time building community resilience in the era of Covid-19 pandemic. Springer Paris 2021-09-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8432277/ /pubmed/34725662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1672-9 Text en © Serdi and Springer-Verlag International SAS, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Brief Reports
Tan, L. F.
Chan, Y. H.
Tay, A.
Jayasundram, J.
Low, N. A.
Merchant, Reshma A.
Practicality and Reliability of Self vs Administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment Mobile App
title Practicality and Reliability of Self vs Administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment Mobile App
title_full Practicality and Reliability of Self vs Administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment Mobile App
title_fullStr Practicality and Reliability of Self vs Administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment Mobile App
title_full_unstemmed Practicality and Reliability of Self vs Administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment Mobile App
title_short Practicality and Reliability of Self vs Administered Rapid Geriatric Assessment Mobile App
title_sort practicality and reliability of self vs administered rapid geriatric assessment mobile app
topic Brief Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1672-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tanlf practicalityandreliabilityofselfvsadministeredrapidgeriatricassessmentmobileapp
AT chanyh practicalityandreliabilityofselfvsadministeredrapidgeriatricassessmentmobileapp
AT taya practicalityandreliabilityofselfvsadministeredrapidgeriatricassessmentmobileapp
AT jayasundramj practicalityandreliabilityofselfvsadministeredrapidgeriatricassessmentmobileapp
AT lowna practicalityandreliabilityofselfvsadministeredrapidgeriatricassessmentmobileapp
AT merchantreshmaa practicalityandreliabilityofselfvsadministeredrapidgeriatricassessmentmobileapp