Cargando…
Empirical Comparisons of 12 Meta-analysis Methods for Synthesizing Proportions of Binary Outcomes
BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis is increasingly used to synthesize proportions (e.g., disease prevalence). It can be implemented with widely used two-step methods or one-step methods, such as generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). Existing simulation studies have shown that GLMMs outperform the two-step...
Autores principales: | Lin, Lifeng, Xu, Chang, Chu, Haitao |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34505983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07098-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Empirical comparisons of meta-analysis methods for diagnostic studies: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Rosenberger, Kristine J, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package
por: Lin, Lifeng, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
por: Ju, Ke, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Empirical comparisons of heterogeneity magnitudes of the risk difference, relative risk, and odds ratio
por: Zhao, Yuxi, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis
por: Spineli, Loukia M.
Publicado: (2019)