Cargando…
The Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Real-World Study
In this retrospective study we reviewed the clinical course of every patient with multiple myeloma treated from 2006 to 2016 at Vejle Hospital: 303 patients with a median age of 69 years at diagnosis received a median of four (range 1–18) lines of therapy; 149 in a 2006–2010 cohort and 154 in a 2011...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Atlantis Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595433 http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/chi.d.190805.002 |
_version_ | 1783751147227447296 |
---|---|
author | Szabo, Agoston Gyula Iversen, Katrine Fladeland Möller, Sören Plesner, Torben |
author_facet | Szabo, Agoston Gyula Iversen, Katrine Fladeland Möller, Sören Plesner, Torben |
author_sort | Szabo, Agoston Gyula |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this retrospective study we reviewed the clinical course of every patient with multiple myeloma treated from 2006 to 2016 at Vejle Hospital: 303 patients with a median age of 69 years at diagnosis received a median of four (range 1–18) lines of therapy; 149 in a 2006–2010 cohort and 154 in a 2011–2016 cohort. After initiation of treatment, the median decrease in the number of patients per each subsequent line of therapy was 22%. Lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n = 156), bortezomib-dexamethasone (n = 107), and bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n = 84) were the most commonly used regimens. The partial response or better rate was 78%, 58%, 55%, and 44% in lines of therapy one to four, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) progression-free survival was 18 (15–22), 10 (8–13), 8 (7–10), and 6 (4–8) months in lines of therapy one to four, respectively. The median (95% CI) overall survival (OS) was 4.1 (3.7–4.8) years. Compared with the 2006–2010 cohort, patients in the 2011–2016 cohort had longer OS; 5.3 (4.7 to not reached) versus 3.4 (2.7–4.0) years, p < 0.0001. This was especially true in patients not treated with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation; 4.7 (3.2–5.9) versus 2.6 (2.0–3.3) years, p = 0.0052. Patients in the 2011–2016 cohort were on treatment during a greater part of their life and had higher exposure to high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, daratumumab, and carfilzomib. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8432372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Atlantis Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84323722021-09-29 The Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Real-World Study Szabo, Agoston Gyula Iversen, Katrine Fladeland Möller, Sören Plesner, Torben Clin Hematol Int Research Article In this retrospective study we reviewed the clinical course of every patient with multiple myeloma treated from 2006 to 2016 at Vejle Hospital: 303 patients with a median age of 69 years at diagnosis received a median of four (range 1–18) lines of therapy; 149 in a 2006–2010 cohort and 154 in a 2011–2016 cohort. After initiation of treatment, the median decrease in the number of patients per each subsequent line of therapy was 22%. Lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n = 156), bortezomib-dexamethasone (n = 107), and bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n = 84) were the most commonly used regimens. The partial response or better rate was 78%, 58%, 55%, and 44% in lines of therapy one to four, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) progression-free survival was 18 (15–22), 10 (8–13), 8 (7–10), and 6 (4–8) months in lines of therapy one to four, respectively. The median (95% CI) overall survival (OS) was 4.1 (3.7–4.8) years. Compared with the 2006–2010 cohort, patients in the 2011–2016 cohort had longer OS; 5.3 (4.7 to not reached) versus 3.4 (2.7–4.0) years, p < 0.0001. This was especially true in patients not treated with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation; 4.7 (3.2–5.9) versus 2.6 (2.0–3.3) years, p = 0.0052. Patients in the 2011–2016 cohort were on treatment during a greater part of their life and had higher exposure to high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, daratumumab, and carfilzomib. Atlantis Press 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8432372/ /pubmed/34595433 http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/chi.d.190805.002 Text en © 2019 International Academy for Clinical Hematology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Szabo, Agoston Gyula Iversen, Katrine Fladeland Möller, Sören Plesner, Torben The Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Real-World Study |
title | The Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Real-World Study |
title_full | The Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Real-World Study |
title_fullStr | The Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Real-World Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Real-World Study |
title_short | The Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Real-World Study |
title_sort | clinical course of multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents: a retrospective, single-center, real-world study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595433 http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/chi.d.190805.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szaboagostongyula theclinicalcourseofmultiplemyelomaintheeraofnovelagentsaretrospectivesinglecenterrealworldstudy AT iversenkatrinefladeland theclinicalcourseofmultiplemyelomaintheeraofnovelagentsaretrospectivesinglecenterrealworldstudy AT mollersoren theclinicalcourseofmultiplemyelomaintheeraofnovelagentsaretrospectivesinglecenterrealworldstudy AT plesnertorben theclinicalcourseofmultiplemyelomaintheeraofnovelagentsaretrospectivesinglecenterrealworldstudy AT szaboagostongyula clinicalcourseofmultiplemyelomaintheeraofnovelagentsaretrospectivesinglecenterrealworldstudy AT iversenkatrinefladeland clinicalcourseofmultiplemyelomaintheeraofnovelagentsaretrospectivesinglecenterrealworldstudy AT mollersoren clinicalcourseofmultiplemyelomaintheeraofnovelagentsaretrospectivesinglecenterrealworldstudy AT plesnertorben clinicalcourseofmultiplemyelomaintheeraofnovelagentsaretrospectivesinglecenterrealworldstudy |