Cargando…
Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access
We sought to compare the safety and efficiency of Tiger-2 in the right radial and Judkins catheter in the left radial access. We retrospectively collected data of 487 patients, involving 172 patients after coronary angiography with Judkins on the left radial artery and 315 patients with Tiger-2 on t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10174020 |
_version_ | 1783751176306556928 |
---|---|
author | Klimek, Katarzyna Świątek, Mateusz Klocek, Konrad Tworek, Michał Zwolski, Maciej Milewski, Krzysztof Janas, Adam |
author_facet | Klimek, Katarzyna Świątek, Mateusz Klocek, Konrad Tworek, Michał Zwolski, Maciej Milewski, Krzysztof Janas, Adam |
author_sort | Klimek, Katarzyna |
collection | PubMed |
description | We sought to compare the safety and efficiency of Tiger-2 in the right radial and Judkins catheter in the left radial access. We retrospectively collected data of 487 patients, involving 172 patients after coronary angiography with Judkins on the left radial artery and 315 patients with Tiger-2 on the right radial artery access. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, except for hypertension ratio and mean age. There was a difference in pulse absence on the radial artery. The volume of contrast used was higher in the Judkins group. Both groups differed in the amount of drugs administered (NTG and heparin). Fluorescence times were comparable between groups. Radiation dosage and AK was significantly greater in the Tiger-2 group. The Tiger-2 catheters were significantly more often changed to another type of catheter (100 changes) than the Judkins (12 changes). However, there was no statistical difference in access site change. Judkins with left radial access seems to be a safer option because of the lower radiation exposure and less incidence of complications than Tiger-2 with right radial access, however, it requires a higher volume of contrast. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8432482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84324822021-09-11 Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access Klimek, Katarzyna Świątek, Mateusz Klocek, Konrad Tworek, Michał Zwolski, Maciej Milewski, Krzysztof Janas, Adam J Clin Med Article We sought to compare the safety and efficiency of Tiger-2 in the right radial and Judkins catheter in the left radial access. We retrospectively collected data of 487 patients, involving 172 patients after coronary angiography with Judkins on the left radial artery and 315 patients with Tiger-2 on the right radial artery access. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, except for hypertension ratio and mean age. There was a difference in pulse absence on the radial artery. The volume of contrast used was higher in the Judkins group. Both groups differed in the amount of drugs administered (NTG and heparin). Fluorescence times were comparable between groups. Radiation dosage and AK was significantly greater in the Tiger-2 group. The Tiger-2 catheters were significantly more often changed to another type of catheter (100 changes) than the Judkins (12 changes). However, there was no statistical difference in access site change. Judkins with left radial access seems to be a safer option because of the lower radiation exposure and less incidence of complications than Tiger-2 with right radial access, however, it requires a higher volume of contrast. MDPI 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8432482/ /pubmed/34501468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10174020 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Klimek, Katarzyna Świątek, Mateusz Klocek, Konrad Tworek, Michał Zwolski, Maciej Milewski, Krzysztof Janas, Adam Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access |
title | Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access |
title_full | Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access |
title_short | Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access |
title_sort | comparison of safety and efficiency between tiger-2 catheter with right radial artery access and judkins catheter with left radial artery access |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10174020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klimekkatarzyna comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess AT swiatekmateusz comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess AT klocekkonrad comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess AT tworekmichał comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess AT zwolskimaciej comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess AT milewskikrzysztof comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess AT janasadam comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess |