Cargando…

Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access

We sought to compare the safety and efficiency of Tiger-2 in the right radial and Judkins catheter in the left radial access. We retrospectively collected data of 487 patients, involving 172 patients after coronary angiography with Judkins on the left radial artery and 315 patients with Tiger-2 on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klimek, Katarzyna, Świątek, Mateusz, Klocek, Konrad, Tworek, Michał, Zwolski, Maciej, Milewski, Krzysztof, Janas, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10174020
_version_ 1783751176306556928
author Klimek, Katarzyna
Świątek, Mateusz
Klocek, Konrad
Tworek, Michał
Zwolski, Maciej
Milewski, Krzysztof
Janas, Adam
author_facet Klimek, Katarzyna
Świątek, Mateusz
Klocek, Konrad
Tworek, Michał
Zwolski, Maciej
Milewski, Krzysztof
Janas, Adam
author_sort Klimek, Katarzyna
collection PubMed
description We sought to compare the safety and efficiency of Tiger-2 in the right radial and Judkins catheter in the left radial access. We retrospectively collected data of 487 patients, involving 172 patients after coronary angiography with Judkins on the left radial artery and 315 patients with Tiger-2 on the right radial artery access. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, except for hypertension ratio and mean age. There was a difference in pulse absence on the radial artery. The volume of contrast used was higher in the Judkins group. Both groups differed in the amount of drugs administered (NTG and heparin). Fluorescence times were comparable between groups. Radiation dosage and AK was significantly greater in the Tiger-2 group. The Tiger-2 catheters were significantly more often changed to another type of catheter (100 changes) than the Judkins (12 changes). However, there was no statistical difference in access site change. Judkins with left radial access seems to be a safer option because of the lower radiation exposure and less incidence of complications than Tiger-2 with right radial access, however, it requires a higher volume of contrast.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8432482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84324822021-09-11 Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access Klimek, Katarzyna Świątek, Mateusz Klocek, Konrad Tworek, Michał Zwolski, Maciej Milewski, Krzysztof Janas, Adam J Clin Med Article We sought to compare the safety and efficiency of Tiger-2 in the right radial and Judkins catheter in the left radial access. We retrospectively collected data of 487 patients, involving 172 patients after coronary angiography with Judkins on the left radial artery and 315 patients with Tiger-2 on the right radial artery access. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, except for hypertension ratio and mean age. There was a difference in pulse absence on the radial artery. The volume of contrast used was higher in the Judkins group. Both groups differed in the amount of drugs administered (NTG and heparin). Fluorescence times were comparable between groups. Radiation dosage and AK was significantly greater in the Tiger-2 group. The Tiger-2 catheters were significantly more often changed to another type of catheter (100 changes) than the Judkins (12 changes). However, there was no statistical difference in access site change. Judkins with left radial access seems to be a safer option because of the lower radiation exposure and less incidence of complications than Tiger-2 with right radial access, however, it requires a higher volume of contrast. MDPI 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8432482/ /pubmed/34501468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10174020 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Klimek, Katarzyna
Świątek, Mateusz
Klocek, Konrad
Tworek, Michał
Zwolski, Maciej
Milewski, Krzysztof
Janas, Adam
Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access
title Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access
title_full Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access
title_fullStr Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access
title_short Comparison of Safety and Efficiency between Tiger-2 Catheter with Right Radial Artery Access and Judkins Catheter with Left Radial Artery Access
title_sort comparison of safety and efficiency between tiger-2 catheter with right radial artery access and judkins catheter with left radial artery access
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10174020
work_keys_str_mv AT klimekkatarzyna comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess
AT swiatekmateusz comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess
AT klocekkonrad comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess
AT tworekmichał comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess
AT zwolskimaciej comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess
AT milewskikrzysztof comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess
AT janasadam comparisonofsafetyandefficiencybetweentiger2catheterwithrightradialarteryaccessandjudkinscatheterwithleftradialarteryaccess