Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis (TBP). METHODS: We searched relevant databases for Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP diagnosis until April 2021 and screened eligible studies for study inclusion. We evaluated the effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Guocan, Zhong, Fangming, Shen, Yanqin, Zheng, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34506587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257220
_version_ 1783751237828608000
author Yu, Guocan
Zhong, Fangming
Shen, Yanqin
Zheng, Hong
author_facet Yu, Guocan
Zhong, Fangming
Shen, Yanqin
Zheng, Hong
author_sort Yu, Guocan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis (TBP). METHODS: We searched relevant databases for Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP diagnosis until April 2021 and screened eligible studies for study inclusion. We evaluated the effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF when the composite reference standard (CRS) and mycobacterial culture were the gold standards, respectively. We performed meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model, and when the heterogeneity was obvious, the source of heterogeneity was further discussed. RESULTS: We included seven independent studies comparing Xpert MTB/RIF with the CRS and six studies comparing it with culture. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of Xpert MTB/RIF were 65% (95% confidence interval, 59–72%), 99% (97–100%), and 0.99 (0.97–0.99) as compared with the CRS, respectively, and 75% (53–88%), 99% (90–100%), and 0.94 (0.92–0.96) as compared with culture, respectively. There was no significant heterogeneity between studies when CRS was the gold standard, whereas heterogeneity was evident when culture was the gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosing TBP was moderate and the specificity was good; thus, Xpert MTB/RIF can be used in the initial diagnosis of TBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8432788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84327882021-09-11 Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Yu, Guocan Zhong, Fangming Shen, Yanqin Zheng, Hong PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis (TBP). METHODS: We searched relevant databases for Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP diagnosis until April 2021 and screened eligible studies for study inclusion. We evaluated the effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF when the composite reference standard (CRS) and mycobacterial culture were the gold standards, respectively. We performed meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model, and when the heterogeneity was obvious, the source of heterogeneity was further discussed. RESULTS: We included seven independent studies comparing Xpert MTB/RIF with the CRS and six studies comparing it with culture. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of Xpert MTB/RIF were 65% (95% confidence interval, 59–72%), 99% (97–100%), and 0.99 (0.97–0.99) as compared with the CRS, respectively, and 75% (53–88%), 99% (90–100%), and 0.94 (0.92–0.96) as compared with culture, respectively. There was no significant heterogeneity between studies when CRS was the gold standard, whereas heterogeneity was evident when culture was the gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosing TBP was moderate and the specificity was good; thus, Xpert MTB/RIF can be used in the initial diagnosis of TBP. Public Library of Science 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8432788/ /pubmed/34506587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257220 Text en © 2021 Yu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yu, Guocan
Zhong, Fangming
Shen, Yanqin
Zheng, Hong
Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of the xpert mtb/rif assay for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34506587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257220
work_keys_str_mv AT yuguocan diagnosticaccuracyofthexpertmtbrifassayfortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhongfangming diagnosticaccuracyofthexpertmtbrifassayfortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenyanqin diagnosticaccuracyofthexpertmtbrifassayfortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhenghong diagnosticaccuracyofthexpertmtbrifassayfortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis