Cargando…
Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation
The purpose of this study is to identify the stress levels that act in inlay and onlay restorations, according to the direction and value of the external force applied. The study was conducted using the Finite Element Method (FEM) of three types of ceramics: pressed lithium disilicate and monolith,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8433907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14175048 |
_version_ | 1783751472025960448 |
---|---|
author | Chirca, Otilia Biclesanu, Cornelia Florescu, Anamaria Stoia, Dan Ioan Pangica, Anna Maria Burcea, Alexandru Vasilescu, Marius Antoniac, Iulian Vasile |
author_facet | Chirca, Otilia Biclesanu, Cornelia Florescu, Anamaria Stoia, Dan Ioan Pangica, Anna Maria Burcea, Alexandru Vasilescu, Marius Antoniac, Iulian Vasile |
author_sort | Chirca, Otilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to identify the stress levels that act in inlay and onlay restorations, according to the direction and value of the external force applied. The study was conducted using the Finite Element Method (FEM) of three types of ceramics: pressed lithium disilicate and monolith, zirconia, and three different adhesive systems: self-adhesive, universal, and dual-cure cements. In addition to FEM, the inlay/onlay-dental structure interface analysis was performed by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The geometric models were reconstructed based on computer tomography images of an undamaged molar followed by geometrical procedures of inducing the inlay and onlay reconstructions. The two functional models were then simulated for different orientations of external force and different material properties, according to the considered adhesives and ceramics. The Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was conducted on 30 extracted teeth, divided into three groups according to the adhesive cement type. Both FEM simulation and SEM investigations reveal very good mechanical behavior of the adhesive-dental structure and adhesive-ceramic interfaces for inlay and onlay reconstructions. All results lead to the conclusion that a physiological mastication force applied, regardless of direction, cannot produce a mechanical failure of either inlay or onlay reconstructions. The adhesive bond between the restorations and the dental structure can stabilize the ceramic restorations, resulting in a higher strength to the action of external forces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8433907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84339072021-09-12 Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation Chirca, Otilia Biclesanu, Cornelia Florescu, Anamaria Stoia, Dan Ioan Pangica, Anna Maria Burcea, Alexandru Vasilescu, Marius Antoniac, Iulian Vasile Materials (Basel) Article The purpose of this study is to identify the stress levels that act in inlay and onlay restorations, according to the direction and value of the external force applied. The study was conducted using the Finite Element Method (FEM) of three types of ceramics: pressed lithium disilicate and monolith, zirconia, and three different adhesive systems: self-adhesive, universal, and dual-cure cements. In addition to FEM, the inlay/onlay-dental structure interface analysis was performed by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The geometric models were reconstructed based on computer tomography images of an undamaged molar followed by geometrical procedures of inducing the inlay and onlay reconstructions. The two functional models were then simulated for different orientations of external force and different material properties, according to the considered adhesives and ceramics. The Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was conducted on 30 extracted teeth, divided into three groups according to the adhesive cement type. Both FEM simulation and SEM investigations reveal very good mechanical behavior of the adhesive-dental structure and adhesive-ceramic interfaces for inlay and onlay reconstructions. All results lead to the conclusion that a physiological mastication force applied, regardless of direction, cannot produce a mechanical failure of either inlay or onlay reconstructions. The adhesive bond between the restorations and the dental structure can stabilize the ceramic restorations, resulting in a higher strength to the action of external forces. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8433907/ /pubmed/34501143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14175048 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chirca, Otilia Biclesanu, Cornelia Florescu, Anamaria Stoia, Dan Ioan Pangica, Anna Maria Burcea, Alexandru Vasilescu, Marius Antoniac, Iulian Vasile Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation |
title | Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation |
title_full | Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation |
title_fullStr | Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation |
title_short | Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation |
title_sort | adhesive-ceramic interface behavior in dental restorations. fem study and sem investigation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8433907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14175048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chircaotilia adhesiveceramicinterfacebehaviorindentalrestorationsfemstudyandseminvestigation AT biclesanucornelia adhesiveceramicinterfacebehaviorindentalrestorationsfemstudyandseminvestigation AT florescuanamaria adhesiveceramicinterfacebehaviorindentalrestorationsfemstudyandseminvestigation AT stoiadanioan adhesiveceramicinterfacebehaviorindentalrestorationsfemstudyandseminvestigation AT pangicaannamaria adhesiveceramicinterfacebehaviorindentalrestorationsfemstudyandseminvestigation AT burceaalexandru adhesiveceramicinterfacebehaviorindentalrestorationsfemstudyandseminvestigation AT vasilescumarius adhesiveceramicinterfacebehaviorindentalrestorationsfemstudyandseminvestigation AT antoniaciulianvasile adhesiveceramicinterfacebehaviorindentalrestorationsfemstudyandseminvestigation |