Cargando…
Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data
The compensation of magnetic and electromagnetic interference generated by drones is one of the main problems related to drone-borne magnetometry. The simplest solution is to suspend the magnetometer at a certain distance from the drone. However, this choice may compromise the flight stability or in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8433984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21175736 |
_version_ | 1783751491055517696 |
---|---|
author | Accomando, Filippo Vitale, Andrea Bonfante, Antonello Buonanno, Maurizio Florio, Giovanni |
author_facet | Accomando, Filippo Vitale, Andrea Bonfante, Antonello Buonanno, Maurizio Florio, Giovanni |
author_sort | Accomando, Filippo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The compensation of magnetic and electromagnetic interference generated by drones is one of the main problems related to drone-borne magnetometry. The simplest solution is to suspend the magnetometer at a certain distance from the drone. However, this choice may compromise the flight stability or introduce periodic data variations generated by the oscillations of the magnetometer. We studied this problem by conducting two drone-borne magnetic surveys using a prototype system based on a cesium-vapor magnetometer with a 1000 Hz sampling frequency. First, the magnetometer was fixed to the drone landing-sled (at 0.5 m from the rotors), and then it was suspended 3 m below the drone. These two configurations illustrate endmembers of the possible solutions, favoring the stability of the system during flight or the minimization of the mobile platform noise. Drone-generated noise was filtered according to a CWT analysis, and both the spectral characteristics and the modelled source parameters resulted analogously to that of a ground magnetic dataset in the same area, which were here taken as a control dataset. This study demonstrates that careful processing can return high quality drone-borne data using both flight configurations. The optimal flight solution can be chosen depending on the survey target and flight conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8433984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84339842021-09-12 Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data Accomando, Filippo Vitale, Andrea Bonfante, Antonello Buonanno, Maurizio Florio, Giovanni Sensors (Basel) Article The compensation of magnetic and electromagnetic interference generated by drones is one of the main problems related to drone-borne magnetometry. The simplest solution is to suspend the magnetometer at a certain distance from the drone. However, this choice may compromise the flight stability or introduce periodic data variations generated by the oscillations of the magnetometer. We studied this problem by conducting two drone-borne magnetic surveys using a prototype system based on a cesium-vapor magnetometer with a 1000 Hz sampling frequency. First, the magnetometer was fixed to the drone landing-sled (at 0.5 m from the rotors), and then it was suspended 3 m below the drone. These two configurations illustrate endmembers of the possible solutions, favoring the stability of the system during flight or the minimization of the mobile platform noise. Drone-generated noise was filtered according to a CWT analysis, and both the spectral characteristics and the modelled source parameters resulted analogously to that of a ground magnetic dataset in the same area, which were here taken as a control dataset. This study demonstrates that careful processing can return high quality drone-borne data using both flight configurations. The optimal flight solution can be chosen depending on the survey target and flight conditions. MDPI 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8433984/ /pubmed/34502628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21175736 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Accomando, Filippo Vitale, Andrea Bonfante, Antonello Buonanno, Maurizio Florio, Giovanni Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data |
title | Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data |
title_full | Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data |
title_fullStr | Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data |
title_short | Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data |
title_sort | performance of two different flight configurations for drone-borne magnetic data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8433984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21175736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT accomandofilippo performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata AT vitaleandrea performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata AT bonfanteantonello performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata AT buonannomaurizio performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata AT floriogiovanni performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata |