Cargando…

Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data

The compensation of magnetic and electromagnetic interference generated by drones is one of the main problems related to drone-borne magnetometry. The simplest solution is to suspend the magnetometer at a certain distance from the drone. However, this choice may compromise the flight stability or in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Accomando, Filippo, Vitale, Andrea, Bonfante, Antonello, Buonanno, Maurizio, Florio, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8433984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21175736
_version_ 1783751491055517696
author Accomando, Filippo
Vitale, Andrea
Bonfante, Antonello
Buonanno, Maurizio
Florio, Giovanni
author_facet Accomando, Filippo
Vitale, Andrea
Bonfante, Antonello
Buonanno, Maurizio
Florio, Giovanni
author_sort Accomando, Filippo
collection PubMed
description The compensation of magnetic and electromagnetic interference generated by drones is one of the main problems related to drone-borne magnetometry. The simplest solution is to suspend the magnetometer at a certain distance from the drone. However, this choice may compromise the flight stability or introduce periodic data variations generated by the oscillations of the magnetometer. We studied this problem by conducting two drone-borne magnetic surveys using a prototype system based on a cesium-vapor magnetometer with a 1000 Hz sampling frequency. First, the magnetometer was fixed to the drone landing-sled (at 0.5 m from the rotors), and then it was suspended 3 m below the drone. These two configurations illustrate endmembers of the possible solutions, favoring the stability of the system during flight or the minimization of the mobile platform noise. Drone-generated noise was filtered according to a CWT analysis, and both the spectral characteristics and the modelled source parameters resulted analogously to that of a ground magnetic dataset in the same area, which were here taken as a control dataset. This study demonstrates that careful processing can return high quality drone-borne data using both flight configurations. The optimal flight solution can be chosen depending on the survey target and flight conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8433984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84339842021-09-12 Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data Accomando, Filippo Vitale, Andrea Bonfante, Antonello Buonanno, Maurizio Florio, Giovanni Sensors (Basel) Article The compensation of magnetic and electromagnetic interference generated by drones is one of the main problems related to drone-borne magnetometry. The simplest solution is to suspend the magnetometer at a certain distance from the drone. However, this choice may compromise the flight stability or introduce periodic data variations generated by the oscillations of the magnetometer. We studied this problem by conducting two drone-borne magnetic surveys using a prototype system based on a cesium-vapor magnetometer with a 1000 Hz sampling frequency. First, the magnetometer was fixed to the drone landing-sled (at 0.5 m from the rotors), and then it was suspended 3 m below the drone. These two configurations illustrate endmembers of the possible solutions, favoring the stability of the system during flight or the minimization of the mobile platform noise. Drone-generated noise was filtered according to a CWT analysis, and both the spectral characteristics and the modelled source parameters resulted analogously to that of a ground magnetic dataset in the same area, which were here taken as a control dataset. This study demonstrates that careful processing can return high quality drone-borne data using both flight configurations. The optimal flight solution can be chosen depending on the survey target and flight conditions. MDPI 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8433984/ /pubmed/34502628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21175736 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Accomando, Filippo
Vitale, Andrea
Bonfante, Antonello
Buonanno, Maurizio
Florio, Giovanni
Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data
title Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data
title_full Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data
title_fullStr Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data
title_short Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data
title_sort performance of two different flight configurations for drone-borne magnetic data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8433984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21175736
work_keys_str_mv AT accomandofilippo performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata
AT vitaleandrea performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata
AT bonfanteantonello performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata
AT buonannomaurizio performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata
AT floriogiovanni performanceoftwodifferentflightconfigurationsfordronebornemagneticdata