Cargando…

Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials

Objective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labban, Nawaf, AlSheikh, Rasha, Lund, Melvin, Matis, Bruce A., Moore, B. Keith, Cochran, Michael A., Platt, Jeffrey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13172851
_version_ 1783751497189687296
author Labban, Nawaf
AlSheikh, Rasha
Lund, Melvin
Matis, Bruce A.
Moore, B. Keith
Cochran, Michael A.
Platt, Jeffrey A.
author_facet Labban, Nawaf
AlSheikh, Rasha
Lund, Melvin
Matis, Bruce A.
Moore, B. Keith
Cochran, Michael A.
Platt, Jeffrey A.
author_sort Labban, Nawaf
collection PubMed
description Objective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cement: Rely X Unicem (RU), Breez (BZ), Maxcem Elite (MX), BisCem (BC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement: FujiCem (FC), FujiPlus (FP) Rely X luting plus (RL) were assessed and fifty-two-disc specimens of each material were fabricated. All specimens were desiccated until a constant weight (W0) was reached. Thirteen specimens for each luting material were then randomly assigned to one of the four water immersion periods (7, 30, 90, and 180 days). After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1. The samples were again desiccated for a second time and W(2) was measured. Both WSP and WSL were determined by the following equations: WSP (%) = (W(1) − W(2)) × 100/W(0) and WSL (%) = (W(0) − W(2)) × 100/W(0). Assessments were performed following ISO standards. ANOVA was used to assess the effect of luting agent and time period on water sorption and solubility. Pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Results: The highest mean WSP and WSL (WSP/WSL) were demonstrated by resin-modified glass-ionomers (RL 18.32/3.25, FC 17.08/4.83, and FP 14.14/1.99), while resin luting agents showed lower WSP and WSL results (PF 1.6/0.67 and RA 1.76/0.46), respectively. The self-adhesive agents exhibited a wide range of WSP and WSL values (RU 1.86/0.13, BZ 4.66/0.93, and MX 3.68/1.11). Self-adhesive cement showed lower WSP and WSL compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers (p < 0.05). All the materials reached equilibrium after 90-days. Conclusions: Resin-based luting materials have the lowest sorption and solubility. Rely X Unicem self-adhesive luting materials were comparable to resin luting materials for WSL and WSP. Resin-modified glass-ionomer showed the highest water sorption and solubility compared with both resin and self-adhesive materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8434010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84340102021-09-12 Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials Labban, Nawaf AlSheikh, Rasha Lund, Melvin Matis, Bruce A. Moore, B. Keith Cochran, Michael A. Platt, Jeffrey A. Polymers (Basel) Article Objective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cement: Rely X Unicem (RU), Breez (BZ), Maxcem Elite (MX), BisCem (BC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement: FujiCem (FC), FujiPlus (FP) Rely X luting plus (RL) were assessed and fifty-two-disc specimens of each material were fabricated. All specimens were desiccated until a constant weight (W0) was reached. Thirteen specimens for each luting material were then randomly assigned to one of the four water immersion periods (7, 30, 90, and 180 days). After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1. The samples were again desiccated for a second time and W(2) was measured. Both WSP and WSL were determined by the following equations: WSP (%) = (W(1) − W(2)) × 100/W(0) and WSL (%) = (W(0) − W(2)) × 100/W(0). Assessments were performed following ISO standards. ANOVA was used to assess the effect of luting agent and time period on water sorption and solubility. Pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Results: The highest mean WSP and WSL (WSP/WSL) were demonstrated by resin-modified glass-ionomers (RL 18.32/3.25, FC 17.08/4.83, and FP 14.14/1.99), while resin luting agents showed lower WSP and WSL results (PF 1.6/0.67 and RA 1.76/0.46), respectively. The self-adhesive agents exhibited a wide range of WSP and WSL values (RU 1.86/0.13, BZ 4.66/0.93, and MX 3.68/1.11). Self-adhesive cement showed lower WSP and WSL compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers (p < 0.05). All the materials reached equilibrium after 90-days. Conclusions: Resin-based luting materials have the lowest sorption and solubility. Rely X Unicem self-adhesive luting materials were comparable to resin luting materials for WSL and WSP. Resin-modified glass-ionomer showed the highest water sorption and solubility compared with both resin and self-adhesive materials. MDPI 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8434010/ /pubmed/34502891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13172851 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Labban, Nawaf
AlSheikh, Rasha
Lund, Melvin
Matis, Bruce A.
Moore, B. Keith
Cochran, Michael A.
Platt, Jeffrey A.
Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials
title Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials
title_full Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials
title_short Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials
title_sort evaluation of the water sorption and solubility behavior of different polymeric luting materials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13172851
work_keys_str_mv AT labbannawaf evaluationofthewatersorptionandsolubilitybehaviorofdifferentpolymericlutingmaterials
AT alsheikhrasha evaluationofthewatersorptionandsolubilitybehaviorofdifferentpolymericlutingmaterials
AT lundmelvin evaluationofthewatersorptionandsolubilitybehaviorofdifferentpolymericlutingmaterials
AT matisbrucea evaluationofthewatersorptionandsolubilitybehaviorofdifferentpolymericlutingmaterials
AT moorebkeith evaluationofthewatersorptionandsolubilitybehaviorofdifferentpolymericlutingmaterials
AT cochranmichaela evaluationofthewatersorptionandsolubilitybehaviorofdifferentpolymericlutingmaterials
AT plattjeffreya evaluationofthewatersorptionandsolubilitybehaviorofdifferentpolymericlutingmaterials