Cargando…
A Rapid Antigen Detection Test to Diagnose SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Exhaled Breath Condensate by A Modified Inflammacheck(®) Device
Background: The standard test that identifies the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is based on reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens. We compared the accuracy of a rapid antigen detection test using exhaled breath...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502603 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21175710 |
_version_ | 1783751518837538816 |
---|---|
author | Maniscalco, Mauro Ambrosino, Pasquale Ciullo, Anna Fuschillo, Salvatore Valente, Valerio Gaudiosi, Carlo Paris, Debora Cobuccio, Raffaele Stefanelli, Francesco Motta, Andrea |
author_facet | Maniscalco, Mauro Ambrosino, Pasquale Ciullo, Anna Fuschillo, Salvatore Valente, Valerio Gaudiosi, Carlo Paris, Debora Cobuccio, Raffaele Stefanelli, Francesco Motta, Andrea |
author_sort | Maniscalco, Mauro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The standard test that identifies the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is based on reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens. We compared the accuracy of a rapid antigen detection test using exhaled breath condensate by a modified Inflammacheck(®) device with the standard RT-PCR to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: We performed a manufacturer-independent, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study involving two Italian hospitals. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of Inflammacheck(®) were calculated using the RT-PCR results as the standard. Further RT-PCR tests were conducted on NP specimens from test positive subjects to obtain the Ct (cycle threshold) values as indicative evidence of the viral load. Results: A total of 105 individuals (41 females, 39.0%; 64 males, 61.0%; mean age: 58.4 years) were included in the final analysis, with the RT-PCR being positive in 13 (12.4%) and negative in 92 (87.6%). The agreement between the two methods was 98.1%, with a Cohen’s κ score of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.79–1.00). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Inflammacheck(®) were 92.3% (95% CI: 64.0%–99.8%) and 98.9% (95% CI: 94.1%–100%), respectively, with a PLR of 84.9 (95% CI: 12.0–600.3) and a NLR of 0.08 (95% CI: 0.01–0.51). Considering a 12.4% disease prevalence in the study cohort, the PPV was 92.3% (95% CI: 62.9%–98.8%) and the NPV was 98.9% (95% CI: 93.3%–99.8%), with an overall accuracy of 98.1% (95% CI: 93.3%–99.8%). The Fagan’s nomogram substantially confirmed the clinical applicability of the test in a realistic scenario with a pre-test probability set at 4%. Ct values obtained for the positive test subjects by means of the RT-PCR were normally distributed between 26 and 38 cycles, corresponding to viral loads from light (38 cycles) to high (26 cycles). The single false negative record had a Ct value of 33, which was close to the mean of the cohort (32.5 cycles). Conclusions: The modified Inflammacheck(®) device may be a rapid, non-demanding and cost-effective method for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This device may be used for routine practice in different healthcare settings (community, hospital, rehabilitation). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8434102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84341022021-09-12 A Rapid Antigen Detection Test to Diagnose SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Exhaled Breath Condensate by A Modified Inflammacheck(®) Device Maniscalco, Mauro Ambrosino, Pasquale Ciullo, Anna Fuschillo, Salvatore Valente, Valerio Gaudiosi, Carlo Paris, Debora Cobuccio, Raffaele Stefanelli, Francesco Motta, Andrea Sensors (Basel) Article Background: The standard test that identifies the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is based on reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens. We compared the accuracy of a rapid antigen detection test using exhaled breath condensate by a modified Inflammacheck(®) device with the standard RT-PCR to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: We performed a manufacturer-independent, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study involving two Italian hospitals. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of Inflammacheck(®) were calculated using the RT-PCR results as the standard. Further RT-PCR tests were conducted on NP specimens from test positive subjects to obtain the Ct (cycle threshold) values as indicative evidence of the viral load. Results: A total of 105 individuals (41 females, 39.0%; 64 males, 61.0%; mean age: 58.4 years) were included in the final analysis, with the RT-PCR being positive in 13 (12.4%) and negative in 92 (87.6%). The agreement between the two methods was 98.1%, with a Cohen’s κ score of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.79–1.00). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Inflammacheck(®) were 92.3% (95% CI: 64.0%–99.8%) and 98.9% (95% CI: 94.1%–100%), respectively, with a PLR of 84.9 (95% CI: 12.0–600.3) and a NLR of 0.08 (95% CI: 0.01–0.51). Considering a 12.4% disease prevalence in the study cohort, the PPV was 92.3% (95% CI: 62.9%–98.8%) and the NPV was 98.9% (95% CI: 93.3%–99.8%), with an overall accuracy of 98.1% (95% CI: 93.3%–99.8%). The Fagan’s nomogram substantially confirmed the clinical applicability of the test in a realistic scenario with a pre-test probability set at 4%. Ct values obtained for the positive test subjects by means of the RT-PCR were normally distributed between 26 and 38 cycles, corresponding to viral loads from light (38 cycles) to high (26 cycles). The single false negative record had a Ct value of 33, which was close to the mean of the cohort (32.5 cycles). Conclusions: The modified Inflammacheck(®) device may be a rapid, non-demanding and cost-effective method for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This device may be used for routine practice in different healthcare settings (community, hospital, rehabilitation). MDPI 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8434102/ /pubmed/34502603 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21175710 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Maniscalco, Mauro Ambrosino, Pasquale Ciullo, Anna Fuschillo, Salvatore Valente, Valerio Gaudiosi, Carlo Paris, Debora Cobuccio, Raffaele Stefanelli, Francesco Motta, Andrea A Rapid Antigen Detection Test to Diagnose SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Exhaled Breath Condensate by A Modified Inflammacheck(®) Device |
title | A Rapid Antigen Detection Test to Diagnose SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Exhaled Breath Condensate by A Modified Inflammacheck(®) Device |
title_full | A Rapid Antigen Detection Test to Diagnose SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Exhaled Breath Condensate by A Modified Inflammacheck(®) Device |
title_fullStr | A Rapid Antigen Detection Test to Diagnose SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Exhaled Breath Condensate by A Modified Inflammacheck(®) Device |
title_full_unstemmed | A Rapid Antigen Detection Test to Diagnose SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Exhaled Breath Condensate by A Modified Inflammacheck(®) Device |
title_short | A Rapid Antigen Detection Test to Diagnose SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Exhaled Breath Condensate by A Modified Inflammacheck(®) Device |
title_sort | rapid antigen detection test to diagnose sars-cov-2 infection using exhaled breath condensate by a modified inflammacheck(®) device |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502603 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21175710 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maniscalcomauro arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT ambrosinopasquale arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT ciulloanna arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT fuschillosalvatore arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT valentevalerio arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT gaudiosicarlo arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT parisdebora arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT cobuccioraffaele arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT stefanellifrancesco arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT mottaandrea arapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT maniscalcomauro rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT ambrosinopasquale rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT ciulloanna rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT fuschillosalvatore rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT valentevalerio rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT gaudiosicarlo rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT parisdebora rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT cobuccioraffaele rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT stefanellifrancesco rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice AT mottaandrea rapidantigendetectiontesttodiagnosesarscov2infectionusingexhaledbreathcondensatebyamodifiedinflammacheckdevice |