Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Third-Generation Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Forming and Crash Applications
While the third generation of advanced high-strength steels (3rd Gen AHSS) have increasingly gained attention for automotive lightweighting, it remains unclear to what extent the developed methodologies for the conventional dual-phase (DP) steels are applicable to this new class of steels. The prese...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501057 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14174970 |
_version_ | 1783751577716129792 |
---|---|
author | Noder, Jacqueline Gutierrez, Jon Edward Zhumagulov, Amir Dykeman, James Ezzat, Hesham Butcher, Clifford |
author_facet | Noder, Jacqueline Gutierrez, Jon Edward Zhumagulov, Amir Dykeman, James Ezzat, Hesham Butcher, Clifford |
author_sort | Noder, Jacqueline |
collection | PubMed |
description | While the third generation of advanced high-strength steels (3rd Gen AHSS) have increasingly gained attention for automotive lightweighting, it remains unclear to what extent the developed methodologies for the conventional dual-phase (DP) steels are applicable to this new class of steels. The present paper provides a comprehensive study on the constitutive, formability, tribology, and fracture behavior of three commercial 3rd Gen AHSS with an ultimate strength level ranging from 980 to 1180 MPa which are contrasted with two DP steels of the same strength levels and the 590R AHSS. The hardening response to large strain levels was determined experimentally using tensile and shear tests and then evaluated in 3D simulations of tensile tests. In general, the strain rate sensitivity of the two 3rd Gen 1180 AHSS was significantly different as one grade exhibited larger transformation-induced behavior. The in-plane formability of the three 1180 MPa steels was similar but with a stark contrast in the local formability whereas the opposite trend was observed for the 3rd Gen 980 and the DP980 steel. The forming limit curves could be accurately predicted using the experimentally measured hardening behavior and the deterministic modified Bressan–Williams through-thickness shear model or the linearized Modified Maximum Force Criterion. The resistance to sliding of the three 3rd Gen AHSS in the Twist Compression Test revealed a comparable coefficient of friction to the 590R except for the electro-galvanized 3rd Gen 1180 V1. An efficient experimental approach to fracture characterization for AHSS was developed that exploits tool contact and bending to obtain fracture strains on the surface of the specimen by suppressing necking. Miniature conical hole expansion, biaxial punch tests, and the VDA 238-100 bend test were performed to construct stress-state dependent fracture loci for use in forming and crash simulations. It is demonstrated that, the 3rd Gen 1180 V2 can potentially replace the DP980 steel in terms of both the global and local formability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8434350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84343502021-09-12 A Comparative Evaluation of Third-Generation Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Forming and Crash Applications Noder, Jacqueline Gutierrez, Jon Edward Zhumagulov, Amir Dykeman, James Ezzat, Hesham Butcher, Clifford Materials (Basel) Article While the third generation of advanced high-strength steels (3rd Gen AHSS) have increasingly gained attention for automotive lightweighting, it remains unclear to what extent the developed methodologies for the conventional dual-phase (DP) steels are applicable to this new class of steels. The present paper provides a comprehensive study on the constitutive, formability, tribology, and fracture behavior of three commercial 3rd Gen AHSS with an ultimate strength level ranging from 980 to 1180 MPa which are contrasted with two DP steels of the same strength levels and the 590R AHSS. The hardening response to large strain levels was determined experimentally using tensile and shear tests and then evaluated in 3D simulations of tensile tests. In general, the strain rate sensitivity of the two 3rd Gen 1180 AHSS was significantly different as one grade exhibited larger transformation-induced behavior. The in-plane formability of the three 1180 MPa steels was similar but with a stark contrast in the local formability whereas the opposite trend was observed for the 3rd Gen 980 and the DP980 steel. The forming limit curves could be accurately predicted using the experimentally measured hardening behavior and the deterministic modified Bressan–Williams through-thickness shear model or the linearized Modified Maximum Force Criterion. The resistance to sliding of the three 3rd Gen AHSS in the Twist Compression Test revealed a comparable coefficient of friction to the 590R except for the electro-galvanized 3rd Gen 1180 V1. An efficient experimental approach to fracture characterization for AHSS was developed that exploits tool contact and bending to obtain fracture strains on the surface of the specimen by suppressing necking. Miniature conical hole expansion, biaxial punch tests, and the VDA 238-100 bend test were performed to construct stress-state dependent fracture loci for use in forming and crash simulations. It is demonstrated that, the 3rd Gen 1180 V2 can potentially replace the DP980 steel in terms of both the global and local formability. MDPI 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8434350/ /pubmed/34501057 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14174970 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Noder, Jacqueline Gutierrez, Jon Edward Zhumagulov, Amir Dykeman, James Ezzat, Hesham Butcher, Clifford A Comparative Evaluation of Third-Generation Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Forming and Crash Applications |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of Third-Generation Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Forming and Crash Applications |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Third-Generation Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Forming and Crash Applications |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Third-Generation Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Forming and Crash Applications |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Third-Generation Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Forming and Crash Applications |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Third-Generation Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Forming and Crash Applications |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of third-generation advanced high-strength steels for automotive forming and crash applications |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501057 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14174970 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noderjacqueline acomparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT gutierrezjonedward acomparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT zhumagulovamir acomparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT dykemanjames acomparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT ezzathesham acomparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT butcherclifford acomparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT noderjacqueline comparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT gutierrezjonedward comparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT zhumagulovamir comparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT dykemanjames comparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT ezzathesham comparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications AT butcherclifford comparativeevaluationofthirdgenerationadvancedhighstrengthsteelsforautomotiveformingandcrashapplications |