Cargando…

Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities

Background: Resin-based composites (RBCs) provide excellent esthetics but the marginal micro-leakage in the proximal cavities remains a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of various dental RBCs and techniques utilized for sealing deep dentin margin in class-II cavi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh, Alhazzaa, Sultan Ali, Albakr, Abdulrahman Hamoud, Habib, Syed Rashid, Zafar, Muhammad Sohail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502961
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13172921
_version_ 1783751598424457216
author Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh
Alhazzaa, Sultan Ali
Albakr, Abdulrahman Hamoud
Habib, Syed Rashid
Zafar, Muhammad Sohail
author_facet Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh
Alhazzaa, Sultan Ali
Albakr, Abdulrahman Hamoud
Habib, Syed Rashid
Zafar, Muhammad Sohail
author_sort Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh
collection PubMed
description Background: Resin-based composites (RBCs) provide excellent esthetics but the marginal micro-leakage in the proximal cavities remains a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of various dental RBCs and techniques utilized for sealing deep dentin margin in class-II cavities. Methods: Box-cavities (class-II) on the distal and mesial surfaces of extracted (premolar) teeth were prepared with a gingival margin placed 1mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction. Teeth with prepared class II cavities were randomly divided into four study groups according to the type of restorative materials (conventional RBC; bulk-fill RBC; conventional RBC lined with flowable RBC and conventional RBC lined with resin-modified glass-ionomer-cement (GIC) as open sandwich-technique). Each group was further subdivided into a total-etch subgroup in which a separate etching step was performed before applying the bonding agent and a self-etch subgroup in which a self-etch adhesive system was used (n = 10). For each group, cavities were restored using the respective restorative materials and techniques, subjected to 1000 thermocycles, and placed in the methylene-blue dye. The specimen teeth were sectioned for further microscopic examination for micro-leakage. Results: The least dye penetration values were reported for group 4 (GIC) followed by the group Bulk-fill using the self-etch adhesive system (group 2b). The highest dye penetration was reported for the group Bulk-fill using the total-etch adhesive system (2a), followed by the group conventional RBC using the total-etch adhesive system). The total-etch adhesive system had significantly greater micro-leakage compared to the self-etch adhesive system (1a) (p = 0.026). Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive system significantly reduced the micro-leakage compared to the total-etch system. Bulk-fill RBC when bonded with the self-etch adhesive provided good marginal sealing ability comparable to open sandwich-technique using GIC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8434433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84344332021-09-12 Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh Alhazzaa, Sultan Ali Albakr, Abdulrahman Hamoud Habib, Syed Rashid Zafar, Muhammad Sohail Polymers (Basel) Article Background: Resin-based composites (RBCs) provide excellent esthetics but the marginal micro-leakage in the proximal cavities remains a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of various dental RBCs and techniques utilized for sealing deep dentin margin in class-II cavities. Methods: Box-cavities (class-II) on the distal and mesial surfaces of extracted (premolar) teeth were prepared with a gingival margin placed 1mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction. Teeth with prepared class II cavities were randomly divided into four study groups according to the type of restorative materials (conventional RBC; bulk-fill RBC; conventional RBC lined with flowable RBC and conventional RBC lined with resin-modified glass-ionomer-cement (GIC) as open sandwich-technique). Each group was further subdivided into a total-etch subgroup in which a separate etching step was performed before applying the bonding agent and a self-etch subgroup in which a self-etch adhesive system was used (n = 10). For each group, cavities were restored using the respective restorative materials and techniques, subjected to 1000 thermocycles, and placed in the methylene-blue dye. The specimen teeth were sectioned for further microscopic examination for micro-leakage. Results: The least dye penetration values were reported for group 4 (GIC) followed by the group Bulk-fill using the self-etch adhesive system (group 2b). The highest dye penetration was reported for the group Bulk-fill using the total-etch adhesive system (2a), followed by the group conventional RBC using the total-etch adhesive system). The total-etch adhesive system had significantly greater micro-leakage compared to the self-etch adhesive system (1a) (p = 0.026). Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive system significantly reduced the micro-leakage compared to the total-etch system. Bulk-fill RBC when bonded with the self-etch adhesive provided good marginal sealing ability comparable to open sandwich-technique using GIC. MDPI 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8434433/ /pubmed/34502961 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13172921 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh
Alhazzaa, Sultan Ali
Albakr, Abdulrahman Hamoud
Habib, Syed Rashid
Zafar, Muhammad Sohail
Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities
title Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities
title_full Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities
title_fullStr Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities
title_short Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities
title_sort comparing the ability of various resin-based composites and techniques to seal margins in class-ii cavities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502961
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13172921
work_keys_str_mv AT aljamhanabdullahsaleh comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities
AT alhazzaasultanali comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities
AT albakrabdulrahmanhamoud comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities
AT habibsyedrashid comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities
AT zafarmuhammadsohail comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities