Cargando…
Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities
Background: Resin-based composites (RBCs) provide excellent esthetics but the marginal micro-leakage in the proximal cavities remains a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of various dental RBCs and techniques utilized for sealing deep dentin margin in class-II cavi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502961 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13172921 |
_version_ | 1783751598424457216 |
---|---|
author | Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh Alhazzaa, Sultan Ali Albakr, Abdulrahman Hamoud Habib, Syed Rashid Zafar, Muhammad Sohail |
author_facet | Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh Alhazzaa, Sultan Ali Albakr, Abdulrahman Hamoud Habib, Syed Rashid Zafar, Muhammad Sohail |
author_sort | Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Resin-based composites (RBCs) provide excellent esthetics but the marginal micro-leakage in the proximal cavities remains a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of various dental RBCs and techniques utilized for sealing deep dentin margin in class-II cavities. Methods: Box-cavities (class-II) on the distal and mesial surfaces of extracted (premolar) teeth were prepared with a gingival margin placed 1mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction. Teeth with prepared class II cavities were randomly divided into four study groups according to the type of restorative materials (conventional RBC; bulk-fill RBC; conventional RBC lined with flowable RBC and conventional RBC lined with resin-modified glass-ionomer-cement (GIC) as open sandwich-technique). Each group was further subdivided into a total-etch subgroup in which a separate etching step was performed before applying the bonding agent and a self-etch subgroup in which a self-etch adhesive system was used (n = 10). For each group, cavities were restored using the respective restorative materials and techniques, subjected to 1000 thermocycles, and placed in the methylene-blue dye. The specimen teeth were sectioned for further microscopic examination for micro-leakage. Results: The least dye penetration values were reported for group 4 (GIC) followed by the group Bulk-fill using the self-etch adhesive system (group 2b). The highest dye penetration was reported for the group Bulk-fill using the total-etch adhesive system (2a), followed by the group conventional RBC using the total-etch adhesive system). The total-etch adhesive system had significantly greater micro-leakage compared to the self-etch adhesive system (1a) (p = 0.026). Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive system significantly reduced the micro-leakage compared to the total-etch system. Bulk-fill RBC when bonded with the self-etch adhesive provided good marginal sealing ability comparable to open sandwich-technique using GIC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8434433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84344332021-09-12 Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh Alhazzaa, Sultan Ali Albakr, Abdulrahman Hamoud Habib, Syed Rashid Zafar, Muhammad Sohail Polymers (Basel) Article Background: Resin-based composites (RBCs) provide excellent esthetics but the marginal micro-leakage in the proximal cavities remains a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of various dental RBCs and techniques utilized for sealing deep dentin margin in class-II cavities. Methods: Box-cavities (class-II) on the distal and mesial surfaces of extracted (premolar) teeth were prepared with a gingival margin placed 1mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction. Teeth with prepared class II cavities were randomly divided into four study groups according to the type of restorative materials (conventional RBC; bulk-fill RBC; conventional RBC lined with flowable RBC and conventional RBC lined with resin-modified glass-ionomer-cement (GIC) as open sandwich-technique). Each group was further subdivided into a total-etch subgroup in which a separate etching step was performed before applying the bonding agent and a self-etch subgroup in which a self-etch adhesive system was used (n = 10). For each group, cavities were restored using the respective restorative materials and techniques, subjected to 1000 thermocycles, and placed in the methylene-blue dye. The specimen teeth were sectioned for further microscopic examination for micro-leakage. Results: The least dye penetration values were reported for group 4 (GIC) followed by the group Bulk-fill using the self-etch adhesive system (group 2b). The highest dye penetration was reported for the group Bulk-fill using the total-etch adhesive system (2a), followed by the group conventional RBC using the total-etch adhesive system). The total-etch adhesive system had significantly greater micro-leakage compared to the self-etch adhesive system (1a) (p = 0.026). Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive system significantly reduced the micro-leakage compared to the total-etch system. Bulk-fill RBC when bonded with the self-etch adhesive provided good marginal sealing ability comparable to open sandwich-technique using GIC. MDPI 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8434433/ /pubmed/34502961 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13172921 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Aljamhan, Abdullah Saleh Alhazzaa, Sultan Ali Albakr, Abdulrahman Hamoud Habib, Syed Rashid Zafar, Muhammad Sohail Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities |
title | Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities |
title_full | Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities |
title_short | Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities |
title_sort | comparing the ability of various resin-based composites and techniques to seal margins in class-ii cavities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34502961 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13172921 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aljamhanabdullahsaleh comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities AT alhazzaasultanali comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities AT albakrabdulrahmanhamoud comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities AT habibsyedrashid comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities AT zafarmuhammadsohail comparingtheabilityofvariousresinbasedcompositesandtechniquestosealmarginsinclassiicavities |