Cargando…
Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes
The popularity of micro-machining is rapidly increasing due to the growing demands for miniature products. Among different micro-machining approaches, micro-turning and micro-milling are widely used in the manufacturing industry. The various cutting parameters of micro-turning and micro-milling has...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109 |
_version_ | 1783751612174434304 |
---|---|
author | Joshi, Milan Ghadai, Ranjan Kumar Madhu, S. Kalita, Kanak Gao, Xiao-Zhi |
author_facet | Joshi, Milan Ghadai, Ranjan Kumar Madhu, S. Kalita, Kanak Gao, Xiao-Zhi |
author_sort | Joshi, Milan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The popularity of micro-machining is rapidly increasing due to the growing demands for miniature products. Among different micro-machining approaches, micro-turning and micro-milling are widely used in the manufacturing industry. The various cutting parameters of micro-turning and micro-milling has a significant effect on the machining performance. Thus, it is essential that the cutting parameters are optimized to obtain the most from the machining process. However, it is often seen that many machining objectives have conflicting parameter settings. For example, generally, a high material removal rate (MRR) is accompanied by high surface roughness (SR). In this paper, metaheuristic multi-objective optimization algorithms are utilized to generate Pareto optimal solutions for micro-turning and micro-milling applications. A comparative study is carried out to assess the performance of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), multi-objective ant lion optimization (MOALO) and multi-objective dragonfly optimization (MODA) in micro-machining applications. The complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method is used to compare the NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA generated Pareto solutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8434492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84344922021-09-12 Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes Joshi, Milan Ghadai, Ranjan Kumar Madhu, S. Kalita, Kanak Gao, Xiao-Zhi Materials (Basel) Article The popularity of micro-machining is rapidly increasing due to the growing demands for miniature products. Among different micro-machining approaches, micro-turning and micro-milling are widely used in the manufacturing industry. The various cutting parameters of micro-turning and micro-milling has a significant effect on the machining performance. Thus, it is essential that the cutting parameters are optimized to obtain the most from the machining process. However, it is often seen that many machining objectives have conflicting parameter settings. For example, generally, a high material removal rate (MRR) is accompanied by high surface roughness (SR). In this paper, metaheuristic multi-objective optimization algorithms are utilized to generate Pareto optimal solutions for micro-turning and micro-milling applications. A comparative study is carried out to assess the performance of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), multi-objective ant lion optimization (MOALO) and multi-objective dragonfly optimization (MODA) in micro-machining applications. The complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method is used to compare the NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA generated Pareto solutions. MDPI 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8434492/ /pubmed/34501205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Joshi, Milan Ghadai, Ranjan Kumar Madhu, S. Kalita, Kanak Gao, Xiao-Zhi Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes |
title | Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes |
title_full | Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes |
title_fullStr | Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes |
title_short | Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes |
title_sort | comparison of nsga-ii, moalo and moda for multi-objective optimization of micro-machining processes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joshimilan comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses AT ghadairanjankumar comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses AT madhus comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses AT kalitakanak comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses AT gaoxiaozhi comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses |