Cargando…

Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes

The popularity of micro-machining is rapidly increasing due to the growing demands for miniature products. Among different micro-machining approaches, micro-turning and micro-milling are widely used in the manufacturing industry. The various cutting parameters of micro-turning and micro-milling has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, Milan, Ghadai, Ranjan Kumar, Madhu, S., Kalita, Kanak, Gao, Xiao-Zhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109
_version_ 1783751612174434304
author Joshi, Milan
Ghadai, Ranjan Kumar
Madhu, S.
Kalita, Kanak
Gao, Xiao-Zhi
author_facet Joshi, Milan
Ghadai, Ranjan Kumar
Madhu, S.
Kalita, Kanak
Gao, Xiao-Zhi
author_sort Joshi, Milan
collection PubMed
description The popularity of micro-machining is rapidly increasing due to the growing demands for miniature products. Among different micro-machining approaches, micro-turning and micro-milling are widely used in the manufacturing industry. The various cutting parameters of micro-turning and micro-milling has a significant effect on the machining performance. Thus, it is essential that the cutting parameters are optimized to obtain the most from the machining process. However, it is often seen that many machining objectives have conflicting parameter settings. For example, generally, a high material removal rate (MRR) is accompanied by high surface roughness (SR). In this paper, metaheuristic multi-objective optimization algorithms are utilized to generate Pareto optimal solutions for micro-turning and micro-milling applications. A comparative study is carried out to assess the performance of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), multi-objective ant lion optimization (MOALO) and multi-objective dragonfly optimization (MODA) in micro-machining applications. The complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method is used to compare the NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA generated Pareto solutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8434492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84344922021-09-12 Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes Joshi, Milan Ghadai, Ranjan Kumar Madhu, S. Kalita, Kanak Gao, Xiao-Zhi Materials (Basel) Article The popularity of micro-machining is rapidly increasing due to the growing demands for miniature products. Among different micro-machining approaches, micro-turning and micro-milling are widely used in the manufacturing industry. The various cutting parameters of micro-turning and micro-milling has a significant effect on the machining performance. Thus, it is essential that the cutting parameters are optimized to obtain the most from the machining process. However, it is often seen that many machining objectives have conflicting parameter settings. For example, generally, a high material removal rate (MRR) is accompanied by high surface roughness (SR). In this paper, metaheuristic multi-objective optimization algorithms are utilized to generate Pareto optimal solutions for micro-turning and micro-milling applications. A comparative study is carried out to assess the performance of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), multi-objective ant lion optimization (MOALO) and multi-objective dragonfly optimization (MODA) in micro-machining applications. The complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method is used to compare the NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA generated Pareto solutions. MDPI 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8434492/ /pubmed/34501205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Joshi, Milan
Ghadai, Ranjan Kumar
Madhu, S.
Kalita, Kanak
Gao, Xiao-Zhi
Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes
title Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes
title_full Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes
title_fullStr Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes
title_short Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes
title_sort comparison of nsga-ii, moalo and moda for multi-objective optimization of micro-machining processes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34501205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109
work_keys_str_mv AT joshimilan comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses
AT ghadairanjankumar comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses
AT madhus comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses
AT kalitakanak comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses
AT gaoxiaozhi comparisonofnsgaiimoaloandmodaformultiobjectiveoptimizationofmicromachiningprocesses