Cargando…

Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for network meta-analysis (NMA) published in 2015 promotes comprehensive reporting in published systematic reviews with NMA. PRISMA-NMA includes 32 items: 27 core items as indicated in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, Tsokani, Sofia, Zevgiti, Stella, Pagkalidou, Irene, Kontouli, Katerina-Maria, Ambarcioglu, Pinar, Pandis, Nikos, Lunny, Carole, Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, Papakonstantinou, Theodoros, Chaimani, Anna, Straus, Sharon E., Hutton, Brian, Tricco, Andrea C., Mavridis, Dimitris, Salanti, Georgia
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2021
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34507621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01780-9

Ejemplares similares

Correction: Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks
por: Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Methodological review to develop a list of bias items used to assess reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: protocol and rationale
por: Lunny, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prevalence of evidence of inconsistency and its association with network structural characteristics in 201 published networks of interventions
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review
por: Zarin, Wasifa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Erratum to: Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review
por: Zarin, Wasifa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Does type of funding affect reporting in network meta-analysis? A scoping review of network meta-analyses
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Characteristics of a loop of evidence that affect detection and estimation of inconsistency: a simulation study
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Answering complex hierarchy questions in network meta-analysis
por: Papakonstantinou, Theodoros, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Estimating the contribution of studies in network meta-analysis: paths, flows and streams
por: Papakonstantinou, Theodoros, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis
por: Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making
por: Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study
por: Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

An investigation of the impact of using different methods for network meta-analysis: a protocol for an empirical evaluation
por: Karahalios, Amalia (Emily), et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
por: Watt, Jennifer A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Watt, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Extensions of the probabilistic ranking metrics of competing treatments in network meta‐analysis to reflect clinically important relative differences on many outcomes
por: Mavridis, Dimitris, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Agreement between ranking metrics in network meta-analysis: an empirical study
por: Chiocchia, Virginia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Estimating the sample size of sham-controlled randomized controlled trials using existing evidence
por: Siontis, George C.M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Safety and effectiveness of long-acting versus intermediate-acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data network meta-analysis
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta‐analysis
por: Papakonstantinou, Theodoros, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Introducing the Treatment Hierarchy Question in Network Meta-Analysis
por: Salanti, Georgia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions
por: Efthimiou, Orestis, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The statistical importance of a study for a network meta-analysis estimate
por: Rücker, Gerta, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Paule‐Mandel estimators for network meta‐analysis with random inconsistency effects
por: Jackson, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Selective reporting bias in randomised controlled trials from two network meta-analyses: comparison of clinical trial registrations and their respective publications
por: Wong, Eric KC, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparative safety and efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s dementia: a systematic review with individual patient data network meta-analysis
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The effects of excluding treatments from network meta-analyses: survey
por: Mills, Edward J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
por: Rethlefsen, Melissa L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews(*)
por: Rethlefsen, Melissa L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?
por: Fleming, Padhraig S., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials
por: Siontis, George CM, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Rapid antigen-based and rapid molecular tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: a rapid review with network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_67putu4vuqcb211nfu6pqb6kir