Cargando…
Examining embedded apparatuses of AI in Facebook and TikTok
In popular discussions, the nuances of AI are often abridged as “the algorithm”, as the specific arrangements of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL) and automated decision-making on social media platforms are typically shrouded in proprietary secrecy punctuated by press releases and transparen...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34539095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01270-5 |
_version_ | 1783751732919009280 |
---|---|
author | Grandinetti, Justin |
author_facet | Grandinetti, Justin |
author_sort | Grandinetti, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In popular discussions, the nuances of AI are often abridged as “the algorithm”, as the specific arrangements of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL) and automated decision-making on social media platforms are typically shrouded in proprietary secrecy punctuated by press releases and transparency initiatives. What is clear, however, is that AI embedded on social media functions to recommend content, personalize ads, aggregate news stories, and moderate problematic material. It is also increasingly apparent that individuals are concerned with the uses, implications, and fairness of algorithmic systems. Perhaps in response to concerns about “the algorithm” by individuals and governments, social media platforms utilize transparency initiatives and official statements, in part, to deflect official regulation. In the following paper, I draw from transparency initiatives and statements from representatives of Facebook and TikTok as case studies of how AI is embedded in these platforms, with attention to the promotion of AI content moderation as a solution to the circulation of problematic material and misinformation. This examination considers the complexity of embedded AI as a material-discursive apparatus, predicated on discursive techniques—what is seeable, sayable, knowable in a given time period—as well as the material arrangements—algorithms, datasets, users, platforms, infrastructures, moderators, etc. As such, the use of AI as part of the immensely popular platforms Facebook and TikTok demonstrates that AI does not exist in isolation, instead functioning as human–machine ensemble reliant on strategies of acceptance via discursive techniques and the changing material arrangements of everyday embeddedness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8435150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84351502021-09-13 Examining embedded apparatuses of AI in Facebook and TikTok Grandinetti, Justin AI Soc Original Article In popular discussions, the nuances of AI are often abridged as “the algorithm”, as the specific arrangements of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL) and automated decision-making on social media platforms are typically shrouded in proprietary secrecy punctuated by press releases and transparency initiatives. What is clear, however, is that AI embedded on social media functions to recommend content, personalize ads, aggregate news stories, and moderate problematic material. It is also increasingly apparent that individuals are concerned with the uses, implications, and fairness of algorithmic systems. Perhaps in response to concerns about “the algorithm” by individuals and governments, social media platforms utilize transparency initiatives and official statements, in part, to deflect official regulation. In the following paper, I draw from transparency initiatives and statements from representatives of Facebook and TikTok as case studies of how AI is embedded in these platforms, with attention to the promotion of AI content moderation as a solution to the circulation of problematic material and misinformation. This examination considers the complexity of embedded AI as a material-discursive apparatus, predicated on discursive techniques—what is seeable, sayable, knowable in a given time period—as well as the material arrangements—algorithms, datasets, users, platforms, infrastructures, moderators, etc. As such, the use of AI as part of the immensely popular platforms Facebook and TikTok demonstrates that AI does not exist in isolation, instead functioning as human–machine ensemble reliant on strategies of acceptance via discursive techniques and the changing material arrangements of everyday embeddedness. Springer London 2021-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8435150/ /pubmed/34539095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01270-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Grandinetti, Justin Examining embedded apparatuses of AI in Facebook and TikTok |
title | Examining embedded apparatuses of AI in Facebook and TikTok |
title_full | Examining embedded apparatuses of AI in Facebook and TikTok |
title_fullStr | Examining embedded apparatuses of AI in Facebook and TikTok |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining embedded apparatuses of AI in Facebook and TikTok |
title_short | Examining embedded apparatuses of AI in Facebook and TikTok |
title_sort | examining embedded apparatuses of ai in facebook and tiktok |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34539095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01270-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grandinettijustin examiningembeddedapparatusesofaiinfacebookandtiktok |