Cargando…

Left Ventricular Global Function Index and the Impact of its Companion Metric

Left ventricular (LV) global function index (LVGFI) has been introduced as a volume-based composite metric for evaluation of ventricular function. The definition formula combines stroke volume (SV), end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and LV mass/density. Being a dimensionless rati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diaz-Navarro, Rienzi A., Kerkhof, Peter L. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.695883
_version_ 1783751848411267072
author Diaz-Navarro, Rienzi A.
Kerkhof, Peter L. M.
author_facet Diaz-Navarro, Rienzi A.
Kerkhof, Peter L. M.
author_sort Diaz-Navarro, Rienzi A.
collection PubMed
description Left ventricular (LV) global function index (LVGFI) has been introduced as a volume-based composite metric for evaluation of ventricular function. The definition formula combines stroke volume (SV), end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and LV mass/density. Being a dimensionless ratio, this new metric has serious limitations which require evaluation at a mathematical and clinical level. Using CMRI in 96 patients we studied LV volumes, various derived metrics and global longitudinal strain (GLS) in order to further characterize LVGFI in three diagnostic groups: acute myocarditis, takotsubo cardiomyopathy and acute myocardial infarction. We also considered the LVGFI companion (C), derived from the quadratic mean. Additional metrics such as ejection fraction (EF), myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) and ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC), along with their companions (MCFC and VACC) were calculated. All companion metrics (EFC, LVGFIC, MCFC, and VACC) showed sex-specific differences, not clearly reflected by the corresponding ratio-based metrics. LVGFI is mathematically coupled to both EF (with R = 0.86) and VAC (R = 0.87), which observation clarifies why these metrics not only share similar prognostic values but also identical shortcomings. We found that the newly introduced LVGFIC has incremental value compared to the single use of LVGFI, EF, or GLS, when characterizing the three patient groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8435684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84356842021-09-14 Left Ventricular Global Function Index and the Impact of its Companion Metric Diaz-Navarro, Rienzi A. Kerkhof, Peter L. M. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Left ventricular (LV) global function index (LVGFI) has been introduced as a volume-based composite metric for evaluation of ventricular function. The definition formula combines stroke volume (SV), end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and LV mass/density. Being a dimensionless ratio, this new metric has serious limitations which require evaluation at a mathematical and clinical level. Using CMRI in 96 patients we studied LV volumes, various derived metrics and global longitudinal strain (GLS) in order to further characterize LVGFI in three diagnostic groups: acute myocarditis, takotsubo cardiomyopathy and acute myocardial infarction. We also considered the LVGFI companion (C), derived from the quadratic mean. Additional metrics such as ejection fraction (EF), myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) and ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC), along with their companions (MCFC and VACC) were calculated. All companion metrics (EFC, LVGFIC, MCFC, and VACC) showed sex-specific differences, not clearly reflected by the corresponding ratio-based metrics. LVGFI is mathematically coupled to both EF (with R = 0.86) and VAC (R = 0.87), which observation clarifies why these metrics not only share similar prognostic values but also identical shortcomings. We found that the newly introduced LVGFIC has incremental value compared to the single use of LVGFI, EF, or GLS, when characterizing the three patient groups. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8435684/ /pubmed/34527709 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.695883 Text en Copyright © 2021 Diaz-Navarro and Kerkhof. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Diaz-Navarro, Rienzi A.
Kerkhof, Peter L. M.
Left Ventricular Global Function Index and the Impact of its Companion Metric
title Left Ventricular Global Function Index and the Impact of its Companion Metric
title_full Left Ventricular Global Function Index and the Impact of its Companion Metric
title_fullStr Left Ventricular Global Function Index and the Impact of its Companion Metric
title_full_unstemmed Left Ventricular Global Function Index and the Impact of its Companion Metric
title_short Left Ventricular Global Function Index and the Impact of its Companion Metric
title_sort left ventricular global function index and the impact of its companion metric
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.695883
work_keys_str_mv AT diaznavarrorienzia leftventricularglobalfunctionindexandtheimpactofitscompanionmetric
AT kerkhofpeterlm leftventricularglobalfunctionindexandtheimpactofitscompanionmetric