Cargando…

Open Resection Compared to Mini-Invasive in Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis

Background: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in the simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Methods: A systematic literature search up to April 2021 was done and 13 studies included 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Jie, Gao, Fengwei, Xie, Qingyun, Zhao, Xin, Lei, Zehua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.726217
_version_ 1783751883968479232
author Gong, Jie
Gao, Fengwei
Xie, Qingyun
Zhao, Xin
Lei, Zehua
author_facet Gong, Jie
Gao, Fengwei
Xie, Qingyun
Zhao, Xin
Lei, Zehua
author_sort Gong, Jie
collection PubMed
description Background: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in the simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Methods: A systematic literature search up to April 2021 was done and 13 studies included 1,181 subjects with colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases at the start of the study; 425 of them were using minimally invasive surgery and 756 were open surgery. They were reporting relationships between the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in the simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in the simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Results: Minimally invasive surgery in subjects with colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 35.61; 95% CI, 7.36–63.87, p = 0.01), less blood loss (MD, −151.62; 95% CI, −228.84 to −74.40, p < 0.001), less blood transfusion needs (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42–0.89, p = 0.01), shorter length of hospital stay (MD, −3.26; 95% CI, −3.67 to −2.86, p < 0.001), lower overall complications (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45–0.79, p < 0.001), higher overall survival (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.21–2.29, p = 0.002), and higher disease-free survival (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.13–1.97, p = 0.005) compared to open surgery. Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery in subjects with colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases may have less blood loss, less blood transfusion needs, shorter length of hospital stay, lower overall complications, higher overall survival, and higher disease-free survival with longer operation time compared with the open surgery. Furthers studies are required to validate these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8435840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84358402021-09-14 Open Resection Compared to Mini-Invasive in Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis Gong, Jie Gao, Fengwei Xie, Qingyun Zhao, Xin Lei, Zehua Front Surg Surgery Background: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in the simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Methods: A systematic literature search up to April 2021 was done and 13 studies included 1,181 subjects with colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases at the start of the study; 425 of them were using minimally invasive surgery and 756 were open surgery. They were reporting relationships between the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in the simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in the simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Results: Minimally invasive surgery in subjects with colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 35.61; 95% CI, 7.36–63.87, p = 0.01), less blood loss (MD, −151.62; 95% CI, −228.84 to −74.40, p < 0.001), less blood transfusion needs (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42–0.89, p = 0.01), shorter length of hospital stay (MD, −3.26; 95% CI, −3.67 to −2.86, p < 0.001), lower overall complications (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45–0.79, p < 0.001), higher overall survival (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.21–2.29, p = 0.002), and higher disease-free survival (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.13–1.97, p = 0.005) compared to open surgery. Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery in subjects with colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases may have less blood loss, less blood transfusion needs, shorter length of hospital stay, lower overall complications, higher overall survival, and higher disease-free survival with longer operation time compared with the open surgery. Furthers studies are required to validate these findings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8435840/ /pubmed/34527699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.726217 Text en Copyright © 2021 Gong, Gao, Xie, Zhao and Lei. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Gong, Jie
Gao, Fengwei
Xie, Qingyun
Zhao, Xin
Lei, Zehua
Open Resection Compared to Mini-Invasive in Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis
title Open Resection Compared to Mini-Invasive in Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Open Resection Compared to Mini-Invasive in Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Open Resection Compared to Mini-Invasive in Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Open Resection Compared to Mini-Invasive in Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Open Resection Compared to Mini-Invasive in Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort open resection compared to mini-invasive in colorectal cancer and liver metastases: a meta-analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.726217
work_keys_str_mv AT gongjie openresectioncomparedtominiinvasiveincolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesametaanalysis
AT gaofengwei openresectioncomparedtominiinvasiveincolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesametaanalysis
AT xieqingyun openresectioncomparedtominiinvasiveincolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesametaanalysis
AT zhaoxin openresectioncomparedtominiinvasiveincolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesametaanalysis
AT leizehua openresectioncomparedtominiinvasiveincolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesametaanalysis