Cargando…

Comparison of SERS pH probe responses after microencapsulation within hydrogel matrices

Significance: Personalized medicine requires the tracking of an individual’s metabolite levels over time to detect anomalies and evaluate the body’s response to medications. Implanted sensors offer effective means to continuously monitor specific metabolite levels, provided they are accurate, stable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotturi, Dayle, Paterson, Sureyya, McShane, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.097001
_version_ 1783751910730235904
author Kotturi, Dayle
Paterson, Sureyya
McShane, Mike
author_facet Kotturi, Dayle
Paterson, Sureyya
McShane, Mike
author_sort Kotturi, Dayle
collection PubMed
description Significance: Personalized medicine requires the tracking of an individual’s metabolite levels over time to detect anomalies and evaluate the body’s response to medications. Implanted sensors offer effective means to continuously monitor specific metabolite levels, provided they are accurate, stable over long time periods, and do no harm. Aim: Four types of hydrogel embedded with pH-sensitive sensors were evaluated for their accuracy, sensitivity, reversibility, longevity, dynamic response, and consistency in static versus dynamic conditions and long-term storage. Approach: Raman spectroscopy was first used to calibrate the intensity of pH-sensitive peaks of the Raman-active hydrogel sensors in a static pH environment. The dynamic response was then assessed for hydrogels exposed to changing pH conditions within a flow cell. Finally, the static pH response after 5 months of storage was determined. Results: All four types of hydrogels allowed the surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) sensors to respond to the pH level of the local environment without introducing interfering signals, resulting in consistent calibration curves. When the pH level changed, the probes in the gels were slow to reach steady-state, requiring several hours, and response times were found to vary among hydrogels. Only one type, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA), lasted five months without significant degradation of dynamic range. Conclusions: While all hydrogels appear to be viable candidates as biocompatible hosts for the SERS sensing chemistry, pHEMA was found to be most functionally stable over the long interval tested. Poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels exhibit the most rapid response to changing pH. Since these two gel types are covalently cross-linked and do not generally degrade, they both offer advantages over sodium alginate for use as implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8435981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84359812021-09-14 Comparison of SERS pH probe responses after microencapsulation within hydrogel matrices Kotturi, Dayle Paterson, Sureyya McShane, Mike J Biomed Opt Sensing Significance: Personalized medicine requires the tracking of an individual’s metabolite levels over time to detect anomalies and evaluate the body’s response to medications. Implanted sensors offer effective means to continuously monitor specific metabolite levels, provided they are accurate, stable over long time periods, and do no harm. Aim: Four types of hydrogel embedded with pH-sensitive sensors were evaluated for their accuracy, sensitivity, reversibility, longevity, dynamic response, and consistency in static versus dynamic conditions and long-term storage. Approach: Raman spectroscopy was first used to calibrate the intensity of pH-sensitive peaks of the Raman-active hydrogel sensors in a static pH environment. The dynamic response was then assessed for hydrogels exposed to changing pH conditions within a flow cell. Finally, the static pH response after 5 months of storage was determined. Results: All four types of hydrogels allowed the surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) sensors to respond to the pH level of the local environment without introducing interfering signals, resulting in consistent calibration curves. When the pH level changed, the probes in the gels were slow to reach steady-state, requiring several hours, and response times were found to vary among hydrogels. Only one type, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA), lasted five months without significant degradation of dynamic range. Conclusions: While all hydrogels appear to be viable candidates as biocompatible hosts for the SERS sensing chemistry, pHEMA was found to be most functionally stable over the long interval tested. Poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels exhibit the most rapid response to changing pH. Since these two gel types are covalently cross-linked and do not generally degrade, they both offer advantages over sodium alginate for use as implants. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021-09-13 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8435981/ /pubmed/34519190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.097001 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Sensing
Kotturi, Dayle
Paterson, Sureyya
McShane, Mike
Comparison of SERS pH probe responses after microencapsulation within hydrogel matrices
title Comparison of SERS pH probe responses after microencapsulation within hydrogel matrices
title_full Comparison of SERS pH probe responses after microencapsulation within hydrogel matrices
title_fullStr Comparison of SERS pH probe responses after microencapsulation within hydrogel matrices
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of SERS pH probe responses after microencapsulation within hydrogel matrices
title_short Comparison of SERS pH probe responses after microencapsulation within hydrogel matrices
title_sort comparison of sers ph probe responses after microencapsulation within hydrogel matrices
topic Sensing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.097001
work_keys_str_mv AT kotturidayle comparisonofsersphproberesponsesaftermicroencapsulationwithinhydrogelmatrices
AT patersonsureyya comparisonofsersphproberesponsesaftermicroencapsulationwithinhydrogelmatrices
AT mcshanemike comparisonofsersphproberesponsesaftermicroencapsulationwithinhydrogelmatrices