Cargando…

Concurrent validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone application CareCoaching in independent, community-dwelling older adults

[Purpose] In this study, we verified the validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone gait analysis application CareCoaching. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 66 independent, community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older who performed a 10-m walking tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oshima, Kensuke, Asai, Tsuyoshi, Esaki, Hisumi, Kameyama, Satoru, Yamamoto, Junshiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34539063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.33.621
_version_ 1783751924966752256
author Oshima, Kensuke
Asai, Tsuyoshi
Esaki, Hisumi
Kameyama, Satoru
Yamamoto, Junshiro
author_facet Oshima, Kensuke
Asai, Tsuyoshi
Esaki, Hisumi
Kameyama, Satoru
Yamamoto, Junshiro
author_sort Oshima, Kensuke
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] In this study, we verified the validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone gait analysis application CareCoaching. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 66 independent, community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older who performed a 10-m walking test twice each under preferred- and slow-speed conditions. We concurrently measured gait motions using CareCoaching and the OptoGait system for reference data. Both systems compute walking speed and step time as gait parameters. We examined the concurrent validity of these parameters by using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and limits of agreement (LOAs) with Bland−Altman analyses. [Results] In the preferred walking speed condition, the ICCs of walking speed and step times between the CareCoaching and the OptoGait system were 0.67 and 0.93, respectively. In the slow walking speed condition, the ICCs for walking speed and step time were 0.78 and 0.97, respectively. In addition, the LOAs for step time were −0.0941 to 0.1160 for preferred walking speed and −0.0596 to 0.0883 for slow walking speed. The LOAs for walking speed were −0.4158 to 0.0568 for preferred walking speed and −0.3348 to 0.0523 for slow walking speed. [Conclusion] CareCoaching showed excellent agreement for step time and moderate-to-good agreement for walking speed in independent, community-dwelling older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8436046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84360462021-09-17 Concurrent validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone application CareCoaching in independent, community-dwelling older adults Oshima, Kensuke Asai, Tsuyoshi Esaki, Hisumi Kameyama, Satoru Yamamoto, Junshiro J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] In this study, we verified the validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone gait analysis application CareCoaching. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 66 independent, community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older who performed a 10-m walking test twice each under preferred- and slow-speed conditions. We concurrently measured gait motions using CareCoaching and the OptoGait system for reference data. Both systems compute walking speed and step time as gait parameters. We examined the concurrent validity of these parameters by using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and limits of agreement (LOAs) with Bland−Altman analyses. [Results] In the preferred walking speed condition, the ICCs of walking speed and step times between the CareCoaching and the OptoGait system were 0.67 and 0.93, respectively. In the slow walking speed condition, the ICCs for walking speed and step time were 0.78 and 0.97, respectively. In addition, the LOAs for step time were −0.0941 to 0.1160 for preferred walking speed and −0.0596 to 0.0883 for slow walking speed. The LOAs for walking speed were −0.4158 to 0.0568 for preferred walking speed and −0.3348 to 0.0523 for slow walking speed. [Conclusion] CareCoaching showed excellent agreement for step time and moderate-to-good agreement for walking speed in independent, community-dwelling older adults. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2021-09-01 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8436046/ /pubmed/34539063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.33.621 Text en 2021©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Oshima, Kensuke
Asai, Tsuyoshi
Esaki, Hisumi
Kameyama, Satoru
Yamamoto, Junshiro
Concurrent validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone application CareCoaching in independent, community-dwelling older adults
title Concurrent validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone application CareCoaching in independent, community-dwelling older adults
title_full Concurrent validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone application CareCoaching in independent, community-dwelling older adults
title_fullStr Concurrent validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone application CareCoaching in independent, community-dwelling older adults
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone application CareCoaching in independent, community-dwelling older adults
title_short Concurrent validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone application CareCoaching in independent, community-dwelling older adults
title_sort concurrent validity of the step time and walking speed obtained from the smartphone application carecoaching in independent, community-dwelling older adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34539063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.33.621
work_keys_str_mv AT oshimakensuke concurrentvalidityofthesteptimeandwalkingspeedobtainedfromthesmartphoneapplicationcarecoachinginindependentcommunitydwellingolderadults
AT asaitsuyoshi concurrentvalidityofthesteptimeandwalkingspeedobtainedfromthesmartphoneapplicationcarecoachinginindependentcommunitydwellingolderadults
AT esakihisumi concurrentvalidityofthesteptimeandwalkingspeedobtainedfromthesmartphoneapplicationcarecoachinginindependentcommunitydwellingolderadults
AT kameyamasatoru concurrentvalidityofthesteptimeandwalkingspeedobtainedfromthesmartphoneapplicationcarecoachinginindependentcommunitydwellingolderadults
AT yamamotojunshiro concurrentvalidityofthesteptimeandwalkingspeedobtainedfromthesmartphoneapplicationcarecoachinginindependentcommunitydwellingolderadults