Cargando…
Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases
Objective: The easy liver fibrosis test (eLIFT) is a novel predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in CLD patients. Methods: We enrolled 1125 patients with CLD who underwent liver b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522187 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.62386 |
_version_ | 1783751933748576256 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Zongguo Ma, Xin Zhou, Xinlan Huang, Dan Wang, Yanbing Li, Xiufen Lu, Wei Zhang, Zhanqing Ding, Rongrong |
author_facet | Yang, Zongguo Ma, Xin Zhou, Xinlan Huang, Dan Wang, Yanbing Li, Xiufen Lu, Wei Zhang, Zhanqing Ding, Rongrong |
author_sort | Yang, Zongguo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The easy liver fibrosis test (eLIFT) is a novel predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in CLD patients. Methods: We enrolled 1125 patients with CLD who underwent liver biopsy. The predictive accuracy for liver inflammation and fibrosis of the eLIFT was assessed and compared to that of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) by ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) of the eLIFT for assessing liver inflammation G ≥ 2 and G ≥ 3 were 0.77 (0.75-0.80) and 0.81 (0.79-0.84), with cut-offs of 8.0 and 11.0, respectively. The AUROCs of the eLIFT for predicting fibrosis stages S ≥ 2 and S4 were 0.72 (0.70-0.76) and 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with cut-offs of 9.0 and 10.0, respectively. In discriminating G≥2 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was better than that of the FIB-4, with no difference compared with the GPR, but lower than that of the APRI. When discriminating G≥3 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was comparable to that of the APRI and GPR but superior to that of the FIB-4. There were no significant differences between the four indexes for predicting S≥2 and S4. Conclusion: The eLIFT is a potentially useful noninvasive predictor of liver inflammation and fibrosis in patients with CLD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8436088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84360882021-09-13 Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases Yang, Zongguo Ma, Xin Zhou, Xinlan Huang, Dan Wang, Yanbing Li, Xiufen Lu, Wei Zhang, Zhanqing Ding, Rongrong Int J Med Sci Research Paper Objective: The easy liver fibrosis test (eLIFT) is a novel predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in CLD patients. Methods: We enrolled 1125 patients with CLD who underwent liver biopsy. The predictive accuracy for liver inflammation and fibrosis of the eLIFT was assessed and compared to that of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) by ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) of the eLIFT for assessing liver inflammation G ≥ 2 and G ≥ 3 were 0.77 (0.75-0.80) and 0.81 (0.79-0.84), with cut-offs of 8.0 and 11.0, respectively. The AUROCs of the eLIFT for predicting fibrosis stages S ≥ 2 and S4 were 0.72 (0.70-0.76) and 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with cut-offs of 9.0 and 10.0, respectively. In discriminating G≥2 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was better than that of the FIB-4, with no difference compared with the GPR, but lower than that of the APRI. When discriminating G≥3 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was comparable to that of the APRI and GPR but superior to that of the FIB-4. There were no significant differences between the four indexes for predicting S≥2 and S4. Conclusion: The eLIFT is a potentially useful noninvasive predictor of liver inflammation and fibrosis in patients with CLD. Ivyspring International Publisher 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8436088/ /pubmed/34522187 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.62386 Text en © The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Yang, Zongguo Ma, Xin Zhou, Xinlan Huang, Dan Wang, Yanbing Li, Xiufen Lu, Wei Zhang, Zhanqing Ding, Rongrong Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases |
title | Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases |
title_full | Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases |
title_fullStr | Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases |
title_short | Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases |
title_sort | predictive performance of elift for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34522187 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.62386 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangzongguo predictiveperformanceofeliftforliverinflammationandfibrosisinchronicliverdiseases AT maxin predictiveperformanceofeliftforliverinflammationandfibrosisinchronicliverdiseases AT zhouxinlan predictiveperformanceofeliftforliverinflammationandfibrosisinchronicliverdiseases AT huangdan predictiveperformanceofeliftforliverinflammationandfibrosisinchronicliverdiseases AT wangyanbing predictiveperformanceofeliftforliverinflammationandfibrosisinchronicliverdiseases AT lixiufen predictiveperformanceofeliftforliverinflammationandfibrosisinchronicliverdiseases AT luwei predictiveperformanceofeliftforliverinflammationandfibrosisinchronicliverdiseases AT zhangzhanqing predictiveperformanceofeliftforliverinflammationandfibrosisinchronicliverdiseases AT dingrongrong predictiveperformanceofeliftforliverinflammationandfibrosisinchronicliverdiseases |