Cargando…
A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators
BACKGROUND: Household survey data are frequently used to measure reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCAH) service utilisation in low and middle income countries. However, these surveys are typically only undertaken every 5 years and tend to be representative of larger ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y |
_version_ | 1783751995483488256 |
---|---|
author | Nilsen, Kristine Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia Leasure, Douglas R. Utazi, C. Edson Ruktanonchai, Corrine W. Wigley, Adelle S. Dooley, Claire A. Matthews, Zoe Tatem, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Nilsen, Kristine Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia Leasure, Douglas R. Utazi, C. Edson Ruktanonchai, Corrine W. Wigley, Adelle S. Dooley, Claire A. Matthews, Zoe Tatem, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Nilsen, Kristine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Household survey data are frequently used to measure reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCAH) service utilisation in low and middle income countries. However, these surveys are typically only undertaken every 5 years and tend to be representative of larger geographical administrative units. Investments in district health management information systems (DHMIS) have increased the capability of countries to collect continuous information on the provision of RMNCAH services at health facilities. However, reliable and recent data on population distributions and demographics at subnational levels necessary to construct RMNCAH coverage indicators are often missing. One solution is to use spatially disaggregated gridded datasets containing modelled estimates of population counts. Here, we provide an overview of various approaches to the production of gridded demographic datasets and outline their potential and their limitations. Further, we show how gridded population estimates can be used as alternative denominators to produce RMNCAH coverage metrics in combination with data from DHMIS, using childhood vaccination as examples. METHODS: We constructed indicators on the percentage of children one year old for diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccine dose 3 (DTP3) and measles vaccine dose (MCV1) in Zambia and Nigeria at district levels. For the numerators, information on vaccines doses was obtained from each country’s respective DHMIS. For the denominators, the number of children was obtained from 3 different sources including national population projections and aggregated gridded estimates derived using top-down and bottom-up geospatial methods. RESULTS: In Zambia, vaccination estimates utilising the bottom-up approach to population estimation substantially reduced the number of districts with > 100% coverage of DTP3 and MCV1 compared to estimates using population projection and the top-down method. In Nigeria, results were mixed with bottom-up estimates having a higher number of districts > 100% and estimates using population projections performing better particularly in the South. CONCLUSIONS: Gridded demographic data utilising traditional and novel data sources obtained from remote sensing offer new potential in the absence of up to date census information in the estimation of RMNCAH indicators. However, the usefulness of gridded demographic data is dependent on several factors including the availability and detail of input data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8436450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84364502021-09-13 A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators Nilsen, Kristine Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia Leasure, Douglas R. Utazi, C. Edson Ruktanonchai, Corrine W. Wigley, Adelle S. Dooley, Claire A. Matthews, Zoe Tatem, Andrew J. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Household survey data are frequently used to measure reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCAH) service utilisation in low and middle income countries. However, these surveys are typically only undertaken every 5 years and tend to be representative of larger geographical administrative units. Investments in district health management information systems (DHMIS) have increased the capability of countries to collect continuous information on the provision of RMNCAH services at health facilities. However, reliable and recent data on population distributions and demographics at subnational levels necessary to construct RMNCAH coverage indicators are often missing. One solution is to use spatially disaggregated gridded datasets containing modelled estimates of population counts. Here, we provide an overview of various approaches to the production of gridded demographic datasets and outline their potential and their limitations. Further, we show how gridded population estimates can be used as alternative denominators to produce RMNCAH coverage metrics in combination with data from DHMIS, using childhood vaccination as examples. METHODS: We constructed indicators on the percentage of children one year old for diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccine dose 3 (DTP3) and measles vaccine dose (MCV1) in Zambia and Nigeria at district levels. For the numerators, information on vaccines doses was obtained from each country’s respective DHMIS. For the denominators, the number of children was obtained from 3 different sources including national population projections and aggregated gridded estimates derived using top-down and bottom-up geospatial methods. RESULTS: In Zambia, vaccination estimates utilising the bottom-up approach to population estimation substantially reduced the number of districts with > 100% coverage of DTP3 and MCV1 compared to estimates using population projection and the top-down method. In Nigeria, results were mixed with bottom-up estimates having a higher number of districts > 100% and estimates using population projections performing better particularly in the South. CONCLUSIONS: Gridded demographic data utilising traditional and novel data sources obtained from remote sensing offer new potential in the absence of up to date census information in the estimation of RMNCAH indicators. However, the usefulness of gridded demographic data is dependent on several factors including the availability and detail of input data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y. BioMed Central 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8436450/ /pubmed/34511089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Nilsen, Kristine Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia Leasure, Douglas R. Utazi, C. Edson Ruktanonchai, Corrine W. Wigley, Adelle S. Dooley, Claire A. Matthews, Zoe Tatem, Andrew J. A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators |
title | A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators |
title_full | A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators |
title_fullStr | A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators |
title_short | A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators |
title_sort | review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nilsenkristine areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT tejedorgaravitonatalia areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT leasuredouglasr areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT utazicedson areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT ruktanonchaicorrinew areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT wigleyadelles areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT dooleyclairea areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT matthewszoe areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT tatemandrewj areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT nilsenkristine reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT tejedorgaravitonatalia reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT leasuredouglasr reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT utazicedson reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT ruktanonchaicorrinew reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT wigleyadelles reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT dooleyclairea reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT matthewszoe reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators AT tatemandrewj reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators |