Cargando…

A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators

BACKGROUND: Household survey data are frequently used to measure reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCAH) service utilisation in low and middle income countries. However, these surveys are typically only undertaken every 5 years and tend to be representative of larger ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilsen, Kristine, Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia, Leasure, Douglas R., Utazi, C. Edson, Ruktanonchai, Corrine W., Wigley, Adelle S., Dooley, Claire A., Matthews, Zoe, Tatem, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y
_version_ 1783751995483488256
author Nilsen, Kristine
Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia
Leasure, Douglas R.
Utazi, C. Edson
Ruktanonchai, Corrine W.
Wigley, Adelle S.
Dooley, Claire A.
Matthews, Zoe
Tatem, Andrew J.
author_facet Nilsen, Kristine
Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia
Leasure, Douglas R.
Utazi, C. Edson
Ruktanonchai, Corrine W.
Wigley, Adelle S.
Dooley, Claire A.
Matthews, Zoe
Tatem, Andrew J.
author_sort Nilsen, Kristine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Household survey data are frequently used to measure reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCAH) service utilisation in low and middle income countries. However, these surveys are typically only undertaken every 5 years and tend to be representative of larger geographical administrative units. Investments in district health management information systems (DHMIS) have increased the capability of countries to collect continuous information on the provision of RMNCAH services at health facilities. However, reliable and recent data on population distributions and demographics at subnational levels necessary to construct RMNCAH coverage indicators are often missing. One solution is to use spatially disaggregated gridded datasets containing modelled estimates of population counts. Here, we provide an overview of various approaches to the production of gridded demographic datasets and outline their potential and their limitations. Further, we show how gridded population estimates can be used as alternative denominators to produce RMNCAH coverage metrics in combination with data from DHMIS, using childhood vaccination as examples. METHODS: We constructed indicators on the percentage of children one year old for diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccine dose 3 (DTP3) and measles vaccine dose (MCV1) in Zambia and Nigeria at district levels. For the numerators, information on vaccines doses was obtained from each country’s respective DHMIS. For the denominators, the number of children was obtained from 3 different sources including national population projections and aggregated gridded estimates derived using top-down and bottom-up geospatial methods. RESULTS: In Zambia, vaccination estimates utilising the bottom-up approach to population estimation substantially reduced the number of districts with > 100% coverage of DTP3 and MCV1 compared to estimates using population projection and the top-down method. In Nigeria, results were mixed with bottom-up estimates having a higher number of districts > 100% and estimates using population projections performing better particularly in the South. CONCLUSIONS: Gridded demographic data utilising traditional and novel data sources obtained from remote sensing offer new potential in the absence of up to date census information in the estimation of RMNCAH indicators. However, the usefulness of gridded demographic data is dependent on several factors including the availability and detail of input data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8436450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84364502021-09-13 A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators Nilsen, Kristine Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia Leasure, Douglas R. Utazi, C. Edson Ruktanonchai, Corrine W. Wigley, Adelle S. Dooley, Claire A. Matthews, Zoe Tatem, Andrew J. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Household survey data are frequently used to measure reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCAH) service utilisation in low and middle income countries. However, these surveys are typically only undertaken every 5 years and tend to be representative of larger geographical administrative units. Investments in district health management information systems (DHMIS) have increased the capability of countries to collect continuous information on the provision of RMNCAH services at health facilities. However, reliable and recent data on population distributions and demographics at subnational levels necessary to construct RMNCAH coverage indicators are often missing. One solution is to use spatially disaggregated gridded datasets containing modelled estimates of population counts. Here, we provide an overview of various approaches to the production of gridded demographic datasets and outline their potential and their limitations. Further, we show how gridded population estimates can be used as alternative denominators to produce RMNCAH coverage metrics in combination with data from DHMIS, using childhood vaccination as examples. METHODS: We constructed indicators on the percentage of children one year old for diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccine dose 3 (DTP3) and measles vaccine dose (MCV1) in Zambia and Nigeria at district levels. For the numerators, information on vaccines doses was obtained from each country’s respective DHMIS. For the denominators, the number of children was obtained from 3 different sources including national population projections and aggregated gridded estimates derived using top-down and bottom-up geospatial methods. RESULTS: In Zambia, vaccination estimates utilising the bottom-up approach to population estimation substantially reduced the number of districts with > 100% coverage of DTP3 and MCV1 compared to estimates using population projection and the top-down method. In Nigeria, results were mixed with bottom-up estimates having a higher number of districts > 100% and estimates using population projections performing better particularly in the South. CONCLUSIONS: Gridded demographic data utilising traditional and novel data sources obtained from remote sensing offer new potential in the absence of up to date census information in the estimation of RMNCAH indicators. However, the usefulness of gridded demographic data is dependent on several factors including the availability and detail of input data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y. BioMed Central 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8436450/ /pubmed/34511089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nilsen, Kristine
Tejedor-Garavito, Natalia
Leasure, Douglas R.
Utazi, C. Edson
Ruktanonchai, Corrine W.
Wigley, Adelle S.
Dooley, Claire A.
Matthews, Zoe
Tatem, Andrew J.
A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators
title A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators
title_full A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators
title_fullStr A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators
title_full_unstemmed A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators
title_short A review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators
title_sort review of geospatial methods for population estimation and their use in constructing reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health service indicators
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06370-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nilsenkristine areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT tejedorgaravitonatalia areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT leasuredouglasr areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT utazicedson areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT ruktanonchaicorrinew areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT wigleyadelles areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT dooleyclairea areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT matthewszoe areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT tatemandrewj areviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT nilsenkristine reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT tejedorgaravitonatalia reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT leasuredouglasr reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT utazicedson reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT ruktanonchaicorrinew reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT wigleyadelles reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT dooleyclairea reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT matthewszoe reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators
AT tatemandrewj reviewofgeospatialmethodsforpopulationestimationandtheiruseinconstructingreproductivematernalnewbornchildandadolescenthealthserviceindicators