Cargando…
The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey
BACKGROUND: Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) are common in primary care and often accompanied by an increasing disease burden for both the patient and healthcare. In medical practice, PSS is historically considered a diagnosis by exclusion or primarily seen as psychological. Besides, registration o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6 |
_version_ | 1783752006637191168 |
---|---|
author | Kitselaar, Willeke M. van der Vaart, Rosalie van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon Vos, Hedwig M. M. Numans, Mattijs E. Evers, Andrea W. M. |
author_facet | Kitselaar, Willeke M. van der Vaart, Rosalie van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon Vos, Hedwig M. M. Numans, Mattijs E. Evers, Andrea W. M. |
author_sort | Kitselaar, Willeke M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) are common in primary care and often accompanied by an increasing disease burden for both the patient and healthcare. In medical practice, PSS is historically considered a diagnosis by exclusion or primarily seen as psychological. Besides, registration of PSS in electronic health records (EHR) is unambiguous and possibly does not reflect classification adequately. The present study explores how general practitioners (GPs) currently register PSS, and their view regarding the need for improvements in classification, registration, and consultations. METHOD: Dutch GPs were invited by email to participate in a national cross-sectional online survey. The survey addressed ICPC-codes used by GPs to register PSS, PSS-related terminology added to free text areas, usage of PSS-related syndrome codes, and GPs’ need for improvement of PSS classification, registration and care. RESULTS: GPs (n = 259) were most likely to use codes specific to the symptom presented (89.3%). PSS-related terminology in free-text areas was used sparsely. PSS-related syndrome codes were reportedly used by 91.5% of GPs, but this was primarily the case for the code for irritable bowel syndrome. The ambiguous registration of PSS is reported as problematic by 47.9% of GPs. Over 56.7% of GPs reported needing additional training, tools or other support for PSS classification and consultation. GPs also reported needing other referral options and better guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of PSS in primary care is currently ambiguous. Approximately half of GPs felt a need for more options for registration of PSS and reported a need for further support. In order to improve classification, registration and care for patients with PSS, there is a need for a more appropriate coding scheme and additional training. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8436507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84365072021-09-13 The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey Kitselaar, Willeke M. van der Vaart, Rosalie van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon Vos, Hedwig M. M. Numans, Mattijs E. Evers, Andrea W. M. BMC Fam Pract Research BACKGROUND: Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) are common in primary care and often accompanied by an increasing disease burden for both the patient and healthcare. In medical practice, PSS is historically considered a diagnosis by exclusion or primarily seen as psychological. Besides, registration of PSS in electronic health records (EHR) is unambiguous and possibly does not reflect classification adequately. The present study explores how general practitioners (GPs) currently register PSS, and their view regarding the need for improvements in classification, registration, and consultations. METHOD: Dutch GPs were invited by email to participate in a national cross-sectional online survey. The survey addressed ICPC-codes used by GPs to register PSS, PSS-related terminology added to free text areas, usage of PSS-related syndrome codes, and GPs’ need for improvement of PSS classification, registration and care. RESULTS: GPs (n = 259) were most likely to use codes specific to the symptom presented (89.3%). PSS-related terminology in free-text areas was used sparsely. PSS-related syndrome codes were reportedly used by 91.5% of GPs, but this was primarily the case for the code for irritable bowel syndrome. The ambiguous registration of PSS is reported as problematic by 47.9% of GPs. Over 56.7% of GPs reported needing additional training, tools or other support for PSS classification and consultation. GPs also reported needing other referral options and better guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of PSS in primary care is currently ambiguous. Approximately half of GPs felt a need for more options for registration of PSS and reported a need for further support. In order to improve classification, registration and care for patients with PSS, there is a need for a more appropriate coding scheme and additional training. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6. BioMed Central 2021-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8436507/ /pubmed/34511065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kitselaar, Willeke M. van der Vaart, Rosalie van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon Vos, Hedwig M. M. Numans, Mattijs E. Evers, Andrea W. M. The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey |
title | The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey |
title_full | The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey |
title_fullStr | The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey |
title_full_unstemmed | The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey |
title_short | The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey |
title_sort | general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitselaarwillekem thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT vandervaartrosalie thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT vantilborgdenboeftmadelon thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT voshedwigmm thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT numansmattijse thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT eversandreawm thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT kitselaarwillekem generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT vandervaartrosalie generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT vantilborgdenboeftmadelon generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT voshedwigmm generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT numansmattijse generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey AT eversandreawm generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey |