Cargando…

The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey

BACKGROUND: Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) are common in primary care and often accompanied by an increasing disease burden for both the patient and healthcare. In medical practice, PSS is historically considered a diagnosis by exclusion or primarily seen as psychological. Besides, registration o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitselaar, Willeke M., van der Vaart, Rosalie, van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon, Vos, Hedwig M. M., Numans, Mattijs E., Evers, Andrea W. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6
_version_ 1783752006637191168
author Kitselaar, Willeke M.
van der Vaart, Rosalie
van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon
Vos, Hedwig M. M.
Numans, Mattijs E.
Evers, Andrea W. M.
author_facet Kitselaar, Willeke M.
van der Vaart, Rosalie
van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon
Vos, Hedwig M. M.
Numans, Mattijs E.
Evers, Andrea W. M.
author_sort Kitselaar, Willeke M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) are common in primary care and often accompanied by an increasing disease burden for both the patient and healthcare. In medical practice, PSS is historically considered a diagnosis by exclusion or primarily seen as psychological. Besides, registration of PSS in electronic health records (EHR) is unambiguous and possibly does not reflect classification adequately. The present study explores how general practitioners (GPs) currently register PSS, and their view regarding the need for improvements in classification, registration, and consultations. METHOD: Dutch GPs were invited by email to participate in a national cross-sectional online survey. The survey addressed ICPC-codes used by GPs to register PSS, PSS-related terminology added to free text areas, usage of PSS-related syndrome codes, and GPs’ need for improvement of PSS classification, registration and care. RESULTS: GPs (n = 259) were most likely to use codes specific to the symptom presented (89.3%). PSS-related terminology in free-text areas was used sparsely. PSS-related syndrome codes were reportedly used by 91.5% of GPs, but this was primarily the case for the code for irritable bowel syndrome. The ambiguous registration of PSS is reported as problematic by 47.9% of GPs. Over 56.7% of GPs reported needing additional training, tools or other support for PSS classification and consultation. GPs also reported needing other referral options and better guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of PSS in primary care is currently ambiguous. Approximately half of GPs felt a need for more options for registration of PSS and reported a need for further support. In order to improve classification, registration and care for patients with PSS, there is a need for a more appropriate coding scheme and additional training. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8436507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84365072021-09-13 The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey Kitselaar, Willeke M. van der Vaart, Rosalie van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon Vos, Hedwig M. M. Numans, Mattijs E. Evers, Andrea W. M. BMC Fam Pract Research BACKGROUND: Persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) are common in primary care and often accompanied by an increasing disease burden for both the patient and healthcare. In medical practice, PSS is historically considered a diagnosis by exclusion or primarily seen as psychological. Besides, registration of PSS in electronic health records (EHR) is unambiguous and possibly does not reflect classification adequately. The present study explores how general practitioners (GPs) currently register PSS, and their view regarding the need for improvements in classification, registration, and consultations. METHOD: Dutch GPs were invited by email to participate in a national cross-sectional online survey. The survey addressed ICPC-codes used by GPs to register PSS, PSS-related terminology added to free text areas, usage of PSS-related syndrome codes, and GPs’ need for improvement of PSS classification, registration and care. RESULTS: GPs (n = 259) were most likely to use codes specific to the symptom presented (89.3%). PSS-related terminology in free-text areas was used sparsely. PSS-related syndrome codes were reportedly used by 91.5% of GPs, but this was primarily the case for the code for irritable bowel syndrome. The ambiguous registration of PSS is reported as problematic by 47.9% of GPs. Over 56.7% of GPs reported needing additional training, tools or other support for PSS classification and consultation. GPs also reported needing other referral options and better guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of PSS in primary care is currently ambiguous. Approximately half of GPs felt a need for more options for registration of PSS and reported a need for further support. In order to improve classification, registration and care for patients with PSS, there is a need for a more appropriate coding scheme and additional training. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6. BioMed Central 2021-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8436507/ /pubmed/34511065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kitselaar, Willeke M.
van der Vaart, Rosalie
van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon
Vos, Hedwig M. M.
Numans, Mattijs E.
Evers, Andrea W. M.
The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey
title The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey
title_full The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey
title_fullStr The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey
title_full_unstemmed The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey
title_short The general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey
title_sort general practitioners perspective regarding registration of persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01525-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kitselaarwillekem thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT vandervaartrosalie thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT vantilborgdenboeftmadelon thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT voshedwigmm thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT numansmattijse thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT eversandreawm thegeneralpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT kitselaarwillekem generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT vandervaartrosalie generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT vantilborgdenboeftmadelon generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT voshedwigmm generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT numansmattijse generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey
AT eversandreawm generalpractitionersperspectiveregardingregistrationofpersistentsomaticsymptomsinprimarycareasurvey