Cargando…

Teff grass for continuous stocking in the Southern High Plains by growing beef steers receiving protein supplements()

This experiment evaluated forage quality, total nutrient yield, water footprint, and growth performance of beef steers receiving protein supplements while grazing Teff grass [‘Tiffany’Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] over two consecutive growing seasons. Each year, four 2.66-ha irrigated paddocks (ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugg, Joel D, Sarturi, Jhones O, West, Charles P, Ballou, Michael A, Henry, Darren D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab136
_version_ 1783752036376903680
author Sugg, Joel D
Sarturi, Jhones O
West, Charles P
Ballou, Michael A
Henry, Darren D
author_facet Sugg, Joel D
Sarturi, Jhones O
West, Charles P
Ballou, Michael A
Henry, Darren D
author_sort Sugg, Joel D
collection PubMed
description This experiment evaluated forage quality, total nutrient yield, water footprint, and growth performance of beef steers receiving protein supplements while grazing Teff grass [‘Tiffany’Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] over two consecutive growing seasons. Each year, four 2.66-ha irrigated paddocks (experimental units) were stocked with crossbred beef steers (n = 5 per paddock, initial BW = 289 ± 30 for yr 1; and n = 6, initial BW = 286 ± 23 for yr 2) in a randomized complete block design and stocked continuously for 63 d. Daily supplements [0.45 kg/d of cottonseed meal (Control) enough to avoid a negative ruminal N balance; and 0.50% mean paddock BW animal-daily (approximately 1.65 kg) of sorghum-dried distillers grains plus solubles, (DDGS)] were randomly assigned to two paddocks each. Supplement did not influence forage neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber, crude protein, or in vitro true digestibility (P ≥ 0.54), except for a tendency (P = 0.08) for a numerical increase in NDF content of paddocks with steers that received DDGS supplementation. Paddock nutrient-yields were similar (P ≥ 0.43) between supplement treatments. Supplementation with DDGS produced greater (P = 0.01) cattle shrunk average daily gain (ADG). Predicted teff dry matter intake (DMI), net energy for maintenance (NE(m)), and growth (NE(g)) (P ≤ 0.03) were greater with cattle offered Control treatment. Predicted total DMI was similar (P = 0.14) although predicted dietary NE(m), NE(g), gain:feed, and total BW gain were greater (P ≤ 0.02) with DDGS. Predicted forage intake was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for cattle offered Control treatment. Teff nutrients remaining on d 56 were similar (P = 0.33) between treatments. Water footprint for total production of forage nutrient components did not differ (P ≥ 0.12) by treatments. Nutrient yield and water use efficiency of continuously stocked teff grass was not affected by supplemental regimen. Using DDGS as a supplement may increase BW gain through increased nutrient utilization without hindering teff nutrient production on a continuous stocking system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8436708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84367082021-09-14 Teff grass for continuous stocking in the Southern High Plains by growing beef steers receiving protein supplements() Sugg, Joel D Sarturi, Jhones O West, Charles P Ballou, Michael A Henry, Darren D Transl Anim Sci Ruminant Nutrition This experiment evaluated forage quality, total nutrient yield, water footprint, and growth performance of beef steers receiving protein supplements while grazing Teff grass [‘Tiffany’Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] over two consecutive growing seasons. Each year, four 2.66-ha irrigated paddocks (experimental units) were stocked with crossbred beef steers (n = 5 per paddock, initial BW = 289 ± 30 for yr 1; and n = 6, initial BW = 286 ± 23 for yr 2) in a randomized complete block design and stocked continuously for 63 d. Daily supplements [0.45 kg/d of cottonseed meal (Control) enough to avoid a negative ruminal N balance; and 0.50% mean paddock BW animal-daily (approximately 1.65 kg) of sorghum-dried distillers grains plus solubles, (DDGS)] were randomly assigned to two paddocks each. Supplement did not influence forage neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber, crude protein, or in vitro true digestibility (P ≥ 0.54), except for a tendency (P = 0.08) for a numerical increase in NDF content of paddocks with steers that received DDGS supplementation. Paddock nutrient-yields were similar (P ≥ 0.43) between supplement treatments. Supplementation with DDGS produced greater (P = 0.01) cattle shrunk average daily gain (ADG). Predicted teff dry matter intake (DMI), net energy for maintenance (NE(m)), and growth (NE(g)) (P ≤ 0.03) were greater with cattle offered Control treatment. Predicted total DMI was similar (P = 0.14) although predicted dietary NE(m), NE(g), gain:feed, and total BW gain were greater (P ≤ 0.02) with DDGS. Predicted forage intake was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for cattle offered Control treatment. Teff nutrients remaining on d 56 were similar (P = 0.33) between treatments. Water footprint for total production of forage nutrient components did not differ (P ≥ 0.12) by treatments. Nutrient yield and water use efficiency of continuously stocked teff grass was not affected by supplemental regimen. Using DDGS as a supplement may increase BW gain through increased nutrient utilization without hindering teff nutrient production on a continuous stocking system. Oxford University Press 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8436708/ /pubmed/34527887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab136 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ruminant Nutrition
Sugg, Joel D
Sarturi, Jhones O
West, Charles P
Ballou, Michael A
Henry, Darren D
Teff grass for continuous stocking in the Southern High Plains by growing beef steers receiving protein supplements()
title Teff grass for continuous stocking in the Southern High Plains by growing beef steers receiving protein supplements()
title_full Teff grass for continuous stocking in the Southern High Plains by growing beef steers receiving protein supplements()
title_fullStr Teff grass for continuous stocking in the Southern High Plains by growing beef steers receiving protein supplements()
title_full_unstemmed Teff grass for continuous stocking in the Southern High Plains by growing beef steers receiving protein supplements()
title_short Teff grass for continuous stocking in the Southern High Plains by growing beef steers receiving protein supplements()
title_sort teff grass for continuous stocking in the southern high plains by growing beef steers receiving protein supplements()
topic Ruminant Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab136
work_keys_str_mv AT suggjoeld teffgrassforcontinuousstockinginthesouthernhighplainsbygrowingbeefsteersreceivingproteinsupplements
AT sarturijhoneso teffgrassforcontinuousstockinginthesouthernhighplainsbygrowingbeefsteersreceivingproteinsupplements
AT westcharlesp teffgrassforcontinuousstockinginthesouthernhighplainsbygrowingbeefsteersreceivingproteinsupplements
AT balloumichaela teffgrassforcontinuousstockinginthesouthernhighplainsbygrowingbeefsteersreceivingproteinsupplements
AT henrydarrend teffgrassforcontinuousstockinginthesouthernhighplainsbygrowingbeefsteersreceivingproteinsupplements