Cargando…

The impact of parental contact upon cortical noxious‐related activity in human neonates

BACKGROUND: Neonates display strong behavioural, physiological and cortical responses to tissue‐damaging procedures. Parental contact can successfully regulate general behavioural and physiological reactivity of the infant, but it is not known whether it can influence noxious‐related activity in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Laura, Laudiano‐Dray, Maria Pureza, Whitehead, Kimberley, Meek, Judith, Fitzgerald, Maria, Fabrizi, Lorenzo, Pillai Riddell, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32965725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1656
_version_ 1783752044160483328
author Jones, Laura
Laudiano‐Dray, Maria Pureza
Whitehead, Kimberley
Meek, Judith
Fitzgerald, Maria
Fabrizi, Lorenzo
Pillai Riddell, Rebecca
author_facet Jones, Laura
Laudiano‐Dray, Maria Pureza
Whitehead, Kimberley
Meek, Judith
Fitzgerald, Maria
Fabrizi, Lorenzo
Pillai Riddell, Rebecca
author_sort Jones, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neonates display strong behavioural, physiological and cortical responses to tissue‐damaging procedures. Parental contact can successfully regulate general behavioural and physiological reactivity of the infant, but it is not known whether it can influence noxious‐related activity in the brain. Brain activity is highly dependent upon maternal presence in animal models, and therefore this could be an important contextual factor in human infant pain‐related brain activity. METHODS: Global topographic analysis was used to identify the presence and inter‐group differences in noxious‐related activity in three separate parental contexts. EEG was recorded during a clinically required heel lance in three age and sex‐matched groups of neonates (a) while held by a parent in skin‐to‐skin (n = 9), (b) while held by a parent with clothing (n = 9) or (c) not held at all, but in individualized care (n = 9). RESULTS: The lance elicited a sequence of 4–5 event‐related potentials (ERPs), including the noxious ERP (nERP), which was smallest for infants held skin‐to‐skin and largest for infants held with clothing (p=0.016). The nERP was then followed by additional and divergent long‐latency ERPs (> 750 ms post‐lance), not previously described, in each of the groups, suggesting the engagement of different higher level cortical processes depending on parental contact. CONCLUSIONS: These results show the importance of considering contextual factors in determining infant brain activity and reveal the powerful influence of parental contact upon noxious‐related activity across the developing human brain. SIGNIFICANCE: This observational study found that the way in which the neonatal brain processes a noxious stimulus is altered by the type of contact the infant has with their mother. Specifically, being held in skin‐to‐skin reduces the magnitude of noxious‐related cortical activity. This work has also shown that different neural mechanisms are engaged depending on the mother/infant context, suggesting maternal contact can change how a baby's brain processes a noxious stimulus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8436758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84367582021-09-17 The impact of parental contact upon cortical noxious‐related activity in human neonates Jones, Laura Laudiano‐Dray, Maria Pureza Whitehead, Kimberley Meek, Judith Fitzgerald, Maria Fabrizi, Lorenzo Pillai Riddell, Rebecca Eur J Pain Original Articles BACKGROUND: Neonates display strong behavioural, physiological and cortical responses to tissue‐damaging procedures. Parental contact can successfully regulate general behavioural and physiological reactivity of the infant, but it is not known whether it can influence noxious‐related activity in the brain. Brain activity is highly dependent upon maternal presence in animal models, and therefore this could be an important contextual factor in human infant pain‐related brain activity. METHODS: Global topographic analysis was used to identify the presence and inter‐group differences in noxious‐related activity in three separate parental contexts. EEG was recorded during a clinically required heel lance in three age and sex‐matched groups of neonates (a) while held by a parent in skin‐to‐skin (n = 9), (b) while held by a parent with clothing (n = 9) or (c) not held at all, but in individualized care (n = 9). RESULTS: The lance elicited a sequence of 4–5 event‐related potentials (ERPs), including the noxious ERP (nERP), which was smallest for infants held skin‐to‐skin and largest for infants held with clothing (p=0.016). The nERP was then followed by additional and divergent long‐latency ERPs (> 750 ms post‐lance), not previously described, in each of the groups, suggesting the engagement of different higher level cortical processes depending on parental contact. CONCLUSIONS: These results show the importance of considering contextual factors in determining infant brain activity and reveal the powerful influence of parental contact upon noxious‐related activity across the developing human brain. SIGNIFICANCE: This observational study found that the way in which the neonatal brain processes a noxious stimulus is altered by the type of contact the infant has with their mother. Specifically, being held in skin‐to‐skin reduces the magnitude of noxious‐related cortical activity. This work has also shown that different neural mechanisms are engaged depending on the mother/infant context, suggesting maternal contact can change how a baby's brain processes a noxious stimulus. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-23 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8436758/ /pubmed/32965725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1656 Text en © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC® https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jones, Laura
Laudiano‐Dray, Maria Pureza
Whitehead, Kimberley
Meek, Judith
Fitzgerald, Maria
Fabrizi, Lorenzo
Pillai Riddell, Rebecca
The impact of parental contact upon cortical noxious‐related activity in human neonates
title The impact of parental contact upon cortical noxious‐related activity in human neonates
title_full The impact of parental contact upon cortical noxious‐related activity in human neonates
title_fullStr The impact of parental contact upon cortical noxious‐related activity in human neonates
title_full_unstemmed The impact of parental contact upon cortical noxious‐related activity in human neonates
title_short The impact of parental contact upon cortical noxious‐related activity in human neonates
title_sort impact of parental contact upon cortical noxious‐related activity in human neonates
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32965725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1656
work_keys_str_mv AT joneslaura theimpactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT laudianodraymariapureza theimpactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT whiteheadkimberley theimpactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT meekjudith theimpactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT fitzgeraldmaria theimpactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT fabrizilorenzo theimpactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT pillairiddellrebecca theimpactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT joneslaura impactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT laudianodraymariapureza impactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT whiteheadkimberley impactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT meekjudith impactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT fitzgeraldmaria impactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT fabrizilorenzo impactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates
AT pillairiddellrebecca impactofparentalcontactuponcorticalnoxiousrelatedactivityinhumanneonates