Cargando…

Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

BACKGROUND: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure is a widely used patient reported outcome measure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of translation procedures and assessment of the psychometric properties of cross-cultural adaptations of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sigirtmac, Ilkem Ceren, Oksuz, Cigdem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 srl 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446684
http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i4.11424
_version_ 1783752055400169472
author Sigirtmac, Ilkem Ceren
Oksuz, Cigdem
author_facet Sigirtmac, Ilkem Ceren
Oksuz, Cigdem
author_sort Sigirtmac, Ilkem Ceren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure is a widely used patient reported outcome measure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of translation procedures and assessment of the psychometric properties of cross-cultural adaptations of the DASH. METHODS: We reviewed the literature to identify all published studies of cultural adaptations of the DASH questionnaire. For the quality assessment, we used Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures, Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaire and COSMIN Checklist for Cross-Cultural Validity. RESULTS: We included 25 articles with 26 versions of the DASH. Only the Puerto Rican version followed all six of the processes of cross-cultural adaptation. None of the versions assessed all eight measurement properties for Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaire and none of them had a positive rating from agreement, internal consistency, responsiveness and interpretability. All the studies got a poor rating according to the COSMIN checklist. DISCUSSION: None of the versions got a good rating from all three checklists. We observed that supplementary tests for the adaptations are necessary, especially for assessing agreement, responsiveness and interpretability. We concluded that all versions need more research on psychometric properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8436820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mattioli 1885 srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84368202021-09-28 Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Sigirtmac, Ilkem Ceren Oksuz, Cigdem Med Lav Original Article BACKGROUND: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure is a widely used patient reported outcome measure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of translation procedures and assessment of the psychometric properties of cross-cultural adaptations of the DASH. METHODS: We reviewed the literature to identify all published studies of cultural adaptations of the DASH questionnaire. For the quality assessment, we used Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures, Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaire and COSMIN Checklist for Cross-Cultural Validity. RESULTS: We included 25 articles with 26 versions of the DASH. Only the Puerto Rican version followed all six of the processes of cross-cultural adaptation. None of the versions assessed all eight measurement properties for Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaire and none of them had a positive rating from agreement, internal consistency, responsiveness and interpretability. All the studies got a poor rating according to the COSMIN checklist. DISCUSSION: None of the versions got a good rating from all three checklists. We observed that supplementary tests for the adaptations are necessary, especially for assessing agreement, responsiveness and interpretability. We concluded that all versions need more research on psychometric properties. Mattioli 1885 srl 2021 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8436820/ /pubmed/34446684 http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i4.11424 Text en Copyright: © 2021 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Sigirtmac, Ilkem Ceren
Oksuz, Cigdem
Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
title Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
title_full Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
title_fullStr Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
title_short Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
title_sort systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (dash)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446684
http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i4.11424
work_keys_str_mv AT sigirtmacilkemceren systematicreviewofthequalityofthecrossculturaladaptationsofdisabilitiesofthearmshoulderandhanddash
AT oksuzcigdem systematicreviewofthequalityofthecrossculturaladaptationsofdisabilitiesofthearmshoulderandhanddash