Cargando…

Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council

BACKGROUND: Assessment of chronic hand eczema (CHE) is complex and warrants standardization. OBJECTIVE: We sought to guide clinicians on the assessment of CHE. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire regarding the diagnosis and assessment of CHE was completed by councilors (n=45) of the International E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silverberg, Jonathan I., Guttman-Yassky, Emma, Agner, Tove, Bissonnette, Robert, Cohen, David E., Simpson, Eric, Wollenberg, Andreas, Thyssen, Jacob P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000659
_version_ 1783752096856670208
author Silverberg, Jonathan I.
Guttman-Yassky, Emma
Agner, Tove
Bissonnette, Robert
Cohen, David E.
Simpson, Eric
Wollenberg, Andreas
Thyssen, Jacob P.
author_facet Silverberg, Jonathan I.
Guttman-Yassky, Emma
Agner, Tove
Bissonnette, Robert
Cohen, David E.
Simpson, Eric
Wollenberg, Andreas
Thyssen, Jacob P.
author_sort Silverberg, Jonathan I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of chronic hand eczema (CHE) is complex and warrants standardization. OBJECTIVE: We sought to guide clinicians on the assessment of CHE. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire regarding the diagnosis and assessment of CHE was completed by councilors (n=45) of the International Eczema Council, an international group of clinicians and researchers with expertise in CHE. The survey consisted of 52 statements for consensus. RESULTS: Overall, nine statements (17.3%) had strong, twenty-three (44.2%) moderate, 12 (23.1%) low, and 8 (15.4%) very low levels of agreement. Five statements had considerable disagreement, including the value of conducting a skin biopsy (62.2% disagreement), investigating for possible type 1 reactions (60.0%), conducting a fungal culture (44.4%), finding no history of relevant allergens and/or irritants (31.1%) in most or all cases, and performing patch testing irrespective of lesion location and morphology (28.9%). Agreement was generally highest among respondents from Europe (28.6–77.8% agreement), followed by Asia (7.1%–35.7% agreement), North America (0%–35.5% agreement), and other (0%–13.3% agreement). CONCLUSIONS: There were substantial differences of agreement, suggesting there are many knowledge and/or practice gaps with respect to CHE. Future research is needed to inform evidence-based and/or consensus guidelines for CHE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8437046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84370462021-09-20 Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council Silverberg, Jonathan I. Guttman-Yassky, Emma Agner, Tove Bissonnette, Robert Cohen, David E. Simpson, Eric Wollenberg, Andreas Thyssen, Jacob P. Dermatitis Studies BACKGROUND: Assessment of chronic hand eczema (CHE) is complex and warrants standardization. OBJECTIVE: We sought to guide clinicians on the assessment of CHE. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire regarding the diagnosis and assessment of CHE was completed by councilors (n=45) of the International Eczema Council, an international group of clinicians and researchers with expertise in CHE. The survey consisted of 52 statements for consensus. RESULTS: Overall, nine statements (17.3%) had strong, twenty-three (44.2%) moderate, 12 (23.1%) low, and 8 (15.4%) very low levels of agreement. Five statements had considerable disagreement, including the value of conducting a skin biopsy (62.2% disagreement), investigating for possible type 1 reactions (60.0%), conducting a fungal culture (44.4%), finding no history of relevant allergens and/or irritants (31.1%) in most or all cases, and performing patch testing irrespective of lesion location and morphology (28.9%). Agreement was generally highest among respondents from Europe (28.6–77.8% agreement), followed by Asia (7.1%–35.7% agreement), North America (0%–35.5% agreement), and other (0%–13.3% agreement). CONCLUSIONS: There were substantial differences of agreement, suggesting there are many knowledge and/or practice gaps with respect to CHE. Future research is needed to inform evidence-based and/or consensus guidelines for CHE. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8437046/ /pubmed/32991335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000659 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Contact Dermatitis Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Studies
Silverberg, Jonathan I.
Guttman-Yassky, Emma
Agner, Tove
Bissonnette, Robert
Cohen, David E.
Simpson, Eric
Wollenberg, Andreas
Thyssen, Jacob P.
Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council
title Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council
title_full Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council
title_fullStr Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council
title_full_unstemmed Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council
title_short Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council
title_sort chronic hand eczema guidelines from an expert panel of the international eczema council
topic Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000659
work_keys_str_mv AT silverbergjonathani chronichandeczemaguidelinesfromanexpertpaneloftheinternationaleczemacouncil
AT guttmanyasskyemma chronichandeczemaguidelinesfromanexpertpaneloftheinternationaleczemacouncil
AT agnertove chronichandeczemaguidelinesfromanexpertpaneloftheinternationaleczemacouncil
AT bissonnetterobert chronichandeczemaguidelinesfromanexpertpaneloftheinternationaleczemacouncil
AT cohendavide chronichandeczemaguidelinesfromanexpertpaneloftheinternationaleczemacouncil
AT simpsoneric chronichandeczemaguidelinesfromanexpertpaneloftheinternationaleczemacouncil
AT wollenbergandreas chronichandeczemaguidelinesfromanexpertpaneloftheinternationaleczemacouncil
AT thyssenjacobp chronichandeczemaguidelinesfromanexpertpaneloftheinternationaleczemacouncil